Tulsa County Court
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 16, 1992
Compliance. State's jury selection procedures found in Compliance with title II because juror listis not drawn solely from list of individuals who hold drivers' licenses. LOFC002
California State Department of Corporations
Burlingame, California
December 31, 1992
Compliance. State health and safety code did not violate title II when it permitted health insurance plans to require continued coverage for children with mental retardation and physical disabilities but not for children with other mental impairments. LOFC003
Division of Elections
Colorado Springs, Colorado
February 5, 1993
Compliance. State procedures requiring application for absentee ballot before each election donot violate title II when polling place is accessible. LOFC004
South Carolina Police Officers Retirement System
Garden City Beach, North Carolina
April 23, 1993
Compliance. State police retirement system, which has different Earnings limitations for disability retirees and services retires, does not violate title II. LOFC005
City of East Lansing. Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
June 2, 1993
Compliance. City's paramedic, fire, and police department complied with title II in treating individual with seizure disorder. LOFC006
New Hanover County
Wilmington, North Carolina
June 11, 1993
Compliance. County did not violate title II when Commissioner made an inappropriate assertion at a grievance hearing. LOFC007
Kansas Department of Corrections
Topeka, Kansas
June 14, 1993
Compliance. Prison provides program access for individuals with disabilities. LOFC008
St. Louis County
Clayton, Missouri
June 14, 1993
Noncompliance. County court failed to provide assistive listening Systems for observers of courtroom proceedings. LOFC009
Fairbanks City Hall
Fairbanks, Alaska
June 15, 1993
Compliance. City's existing ramp provides program access and altered ramp complies with design standards under both TJFAS and ADAAG. LOFC010
Town of Louisa
Louisa, Virginia
July 19, 1993
Compliance. Town did not violate title II when it terminated police officer because to provide indefinite leave without pay, as he requested, would impose an undue hardship upon this small town. LOFC011
Oshkosh Correctional Institution
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
July 23, 1993
Compliance. Complainant's disability, consisting of a buried disc and possibly a pinched nerve, did not qualify as a "disability" under title II. LOFC012
Elections Commission and City Clerk
Lansing, Michigan
July 27, 1993
Compliance. Election Commission found in compliance with the Requirements of title II for accessible polling places after furniture blocking entrance was removed and signage was added. LOFC013
Washoe County Sheriff's Department
Reno, Nevada
July 28, 1993
Compliance. Complainant's temporary impairment does not fall within the title II definition of "disability." LOFC014
Huerfano County Sheriff's Office
Trinidad, Colorado
August 2, 1993
Compliance. Sheriff's office visiting room found fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. LOFC015
Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky
Frankfort, Kentucky
August 12, 1993
Compliance. State office made reasonable accommodation for complainant's disability(blindness), and his disability was not found to be a factor in his termination. LOFC016
Clark County Election Department
Las Vegas, Nevada
August 19, 1993
Compliance. County policy of providing curbside voting is an acceptable alternative method to enabling individuals with mobility impairments to cast ballots on Election Day. LOFC017
Supervisor of Elections, Pinellas County
Clearwater, Florida
August 25, 1993
Compliance. Providing assistance to blind voters, rather than Braille ballots, does not violate title II. LOFC018
City of San Francisco
San Francisco, California
September 8, 1993
Compliance. Prohibiting use of perfume or other scented products by employees is not required by title II because it would not be a "reasonable" modification for an individual with environmental illness. LOFC019
Shelby County Trustee
Memphis, Tennessee
September 8, 1993
Compliance. Complainant's alleged disabilities (stress and carpal tunnel syndrome) were not substantial enough to qualify as disabilities under title II, and there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the entity retaliated against complainant in violation of title II.
LOFC020
Orangeburg County Voter Registration & Election Commission
Neeses, South Carolina
September 10, 1993
Compliance. County provision of curbside voting for individuals with disabilities meets the title I requirement for program accessibility. LOFC021
Alleghany County Department of Social Services
Galax, Virginia
September 16, 1993
Compliance. County's use of eligibility criteria that might tend to screen out individuals with disabilities (history of mental illness) was necessary to the operation of the custody placement programs. LOFC022
City and County of Denver Election Commission
Denver, Colorado
September 30, 1993
Compliance. Election commission's provision of curbside voting for individuals with disabilities meets the title II requirement for program accessibility. LOFC023
Town of Falmouth, Maine
Falmouth, Maine
October 19, 1993
Compliance. Town took appropriate steps to provide access to its programs,services, and activities in the town hall, including relocating to other accessible sites and providing appropriate parking. LOFC024
Van Buren County, Courthouse
Clinton, Arkansas
November 23, 1993
Noncompliance. Entity failed to provide access to the programs and activities located in its courthouse and failed to comply with administrative requirements in the title II regulation as well. LOFC025
State of New Jersey
Lakewood, New Jersey
Compliance. State laws concerning jury service, veteran's preference, and voting did not violate title II because in each instance allegations of disparate impact were based on mere conjecture. LOFC026
New Haven, Connecticut, Police and Fire Departments
New Haven, Connecticut
January 11, 1994
Compliance. City fire and police departments appropriately responded during emergency to individual with seizure disorder. LOFC027
New York State Board of Law Examiners
Albany, New York
January 13, 1994
Noncompliance. Board of law examiners denied auxiliary aids and other accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities taking the bar exam. LOFC028
Superior Court for the State of Alaska
Anchorage, Alaska
February 3, 1994
Compliance. Court did not violate title II when it denied complainant's motion to file audiocassette in place of written briefs because complainant failed to establish nexus between his impairment and the requested modification to the court's rules. LOFC029
Seattle Police Department
Seattle, Washington
February 4, 1994
Compliance. City office complied with title II by providing accommodations to individuals with disabilities when reviewing public records. LOFC030
City of Xenia, Ohio
Xenia, Ohio
March 14, 1994
Compliance. City consistently applied a neutral zoning policy, and there was no evidence that the policy had an adverse impact on people with disabilities LOFC031
Superior Court for the State of California for Kings County
Hanford, California
March 14, 1994
Compliance. Court purchased sufficient assistive listening systems to provide effective communications for individuals and who are hard-of-hearing. LOF032
Pennsylvania Minor Judiciary Education Board
Reading, Pennsylvania
May 13, 1994
Compliance. State board that had failed to provide complainant sufficient time to accommodate his disability on a certification examination came into compliance by offering to allow the complainant to re-take the examination at no additional cost and by agreeing to provide appropriate accommodations in the future. LOF033
City and County of Denver
Denver, Colorado
August 22, 1994
Noncompliance. Police Department failed to provide reassignment as a reasonable accommodation for a disabled police officer. LOF034
Town of Henrietta
Henrietta New York
August 29, 1994
Compliance. Town made various structural changes to improve accessibility at complainant's worksite and to enhance accessibility to public programs, services, and activities. LOF035
Hilton Head Island Fire Department Hilton Head, South Carolina
October 12, 1994
Compliance. The Fire Department did not violate Title II when it fired complainant because it had first made efforts to reasonably accommodate his disability (mental impairment). LOF036
Atascadero Police Department
Atascadero, California
Compliance. The Atascadero Police Department did not violate Title II when it arrested a man who had speech and mobility impairments for driving under the influence of alcohol in light of fact that he refused to take a blood alcohol test and failed two other sobriety tests. LOF037
Committee on Character and Fitness, Arizona Supreme Court
Phoenix, Arizona
November 7, 1994
Compliance. State Bar found in compliance with Title II after it corrected violation by eliminating questions on its bar application that asked about a history of mental, emotional, or nervous disorders and treatment for excessive use of alcohol or drugs. LOF038
Snohomish County Superior Court
Everett, Washington
November 21, 1994
Compliance. County Court found in compliance with the Title II requirements for effective communication after it established a policy requiring consultation with individuals with hearing impairments to identify needed auxiliary aids. LOF039
City of San Francisco
San Francisco, California
November 21, 1994
Compliance. City did not violate Title II when it rescinded its policy of requesting that individuals not wear scented products to City Council meetings or other City programs. LOF040
Circuit Court of Berkeley County, and Supreme Court of Appeals, West Virginia
December 19, 1994
Compliance. Circuit court did not violate Title II when it relieved the bondsman of his responsibility for the bail of an individual with a mental disability because the action was based on a nondiscriminatory reason (the length of time that the charges had been pending) rather thanon the individual disability. Supreme Court did not violate Title II when it denied the individuals appeal. LOF041
Cuyahoga County Commissioners
Cleveland, Ohio
December 23, 1994
Compliance. County Court found in compliance with the Title II requirements for effective communication after it corrected violation and purchased computerized real-time transcription,as had been requested by individual who is hard of hearing. LOF042
Gratiot County Circuit Court
Kincheloe, Michigan
January 23, 1995
Compliance. County circuit court did not discriminate against the complainant on the basis of his disability (learning disability and emotional illness) when it sentenced him to jail instead of the community corrections program. LOF043
Cottonport Police Department
Cottonport, Louisiana
January 23, 1995
Compliance. Police Department did not violate Title II when it detained complainant who was deaf because it took appropriate steps to ensure that its communication with the complainant was as effective as communication with others. LOF044
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
January 27, 1995
Compliance. The Commonwealth's decision to require State retirees to enroll in Medicare Part Bdid not discriminate against individuals with disabilities because all retirees, regardless of whether they were on regular or disability requirements, were required to enroll in the Medicare program. LOF045
Arlington County Emergency Medical Services
Arlington County, Virginia
February 1, 1995
Compliance. County ambulance service did not violate Title II when it refused to transport the adult son of the complainant, whom she alleged was suffering from a seizure disorder, to the hospital. LOF046
West Peoria Fire Protection District
Peoria, Illinois
February 6, 1995
Compliance. The District did not discriminate against a one-armed complainant when it denied him the opportunity to drive emergency fire equipment because the decision was based on objective evaluations of the complainant's driving skills by qualified supervisory personnel who concluded that the complainant would pose a direct threat to the safety of the public and fellow employees if allowed to drive. LOF047
Borough of Lavellette, NJ
05/20/96 Public meeting accessibility for hearing impaired. LOF048
City of New York
06/11/96
Accessibility of town hall meetings LOF049
Moses Lake Police Department, WA
06/12/96
911 access via TDD LOF050
Parker County Sheriff's Department
Weatherford, Texas
06/14/96
Provision for sign language interpreter during arrest of suspect. LOF051
Kannapolis Municipal Building
Kannapolis, NC
07/08/96
Programs located in inaccessible building LOF052
City of New Rochelle, NY
07/11/96 City modifies garbage service to provide door side service to the disabled LOF053
City of Scottsdale, AZ
07/09/96
Provision of braille signage at city hall LOF054
Hardinburg County, KY
07/10/96 County courthouse inaccessible LOF055
Michigan Dept. Of State Police
07/16/96
Emergency service plan for TTY/TDD users LOF056
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas
07/16/96 Providing sign language interpreter LOF057
Municipal Court of Oakland-Piedmont-Emeryville Judicial District 08/06/96
Provision of auxiliary aids and services in court LOF058
Bernalillo County Courthouse,
Bernallio, NM
08/08/96 Access to programs and activities at courthouse and creation of alternative entrance LOF059
Lake County Board of Elections
Painsville, OH
Wheelchair access to public buildings LOF060
Tulare County Jail, CA
TDD access to inmates with hearing impairments LOF061
Pennsylvania Convention Center
Program asscessibility in the Exhibition Hall and Convention Center facilities LOF062
Pendelton Courthouse,
Frankilin WVA
8/19/96
Wheelchair access to programs and services LOF063
Seventeenth Judicial Circuit
Boward County, Fl
09/04/96
Participation in the courts via telephone LOF064
New Castle Police
New Castle, PA
10/16/96
Police communication with hearing impaired and learning disabled LOF065
Charter Township
Canton, MI
07/16/96 Alternative format for written information LOF066
Madison County District Court
08/09/06
Provision of interpreter during complainant's arraignment LOF067
Tacoma Dome, WA
09/09/96
Wheelchair accessability and ticketing policy LOF068
Metropolitan Police Force
District of Columbia
10/09/96
Medication for prisoner with a seizure disorder LOF069
City Hall
Albion, MI
10/23/96
Wheelchair access LOF070
New Jersey Board of Cosmetology and Harstyling
Testing accommodation LOF071
City of Havana and Mason Co., Il
10/29/96 Public hearing wheelchair access LOF072
City of Bellingham, WA
10/22/96
Accessibility of public hearing buildings LOF073
Osceola Co. Courthouse, MI
11/04/96
Accessibility to courthouse for wheelchairs LOF074
Novi Police Department
Novi, Md
Access to front of station by persons with mobility impairment LOF075
Chavez Co. Law Library, NM
11/05/96
Access to library for people with movement disabilities LOF76
District Court
Jefferson Co., Ky
11/15/96
Ky sign language provision LOF77
Okeechobe County, Florida
11/15/96
Inaccessible polling place for persons with mobility impairment LOF78
Southern Md. Pre-Release Unit, Dept. Of Public Safety and Correctional Services, MD
11/29/96
Denial of use of accessible parking place LOF79
Department of Public Works
City of Indianapolis, IN
11/12/96
Termination of employee because of disability LOF80
Greene Superior Court
Bloomfield, IN
11/14/96
Provisions for auxiliary aids and services in the courts LOF81
City of Harper Woods, MI
11/19/06
Provisions for auxiliary aids LOF82
Mason City Hall
Mason, MI
11/22/96 Access to city hall LOF83
Commission for the Blind
State of Texas
Austin, Texas
5/8/97
Compliance. Employment issues. LOF84
