Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income
The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
Table 6
Child Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2003)
State Total % of Children Licensed or Regulated Providers Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation
Child's Home Family Home Group Home Center Child's Home Family Home Group Home Center
Relative Non-
Relative		 Relative Non-
Relative		 Relative Non-
Relative
Alabama 100% 0% 6% 5% 69% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 15%
Alaska 100% 0% 17% 5% 46% 5% 7% 9% 12% 0% 0% 0%
American Samoa 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Arizona 100% 1% 9% 6% 72% 3% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Arkansas 100% 0% 25% 0% 75% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
California 100% 0% 11% 9% 48% 4% 1% 15% 7% 0% 0% 5%
Colorado 100% 0% 18% 0% 60% 1% 6% 9% 6% 0% 0% 0%
Connecticut 100% 0% 7% 0% 50% 14% 5% 11% 12% 0% 0% 0%
Delaware 100% 0% 31% 2% 45% 4% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 11%
District of Columbia 100% 0% 3% 0% 58% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 38%
Florida 100% 0% 10% 0% 80% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 8%
Georgia 100% 0% 9% 2% 83% 1% 1% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Guam 100% 0% 0% 1% 58% 11% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 20%
Hawaii 100% 0% 6% 0% 20% 6% 0% 51% 11% 0% 0% 5%
Idaho 100% 0% 0% 16% 46% 1% 1% 15% 21% 0% 0% 0%
Illinois 100% 0% 16% 1% 33% 10% 14% 18% 5% 0% 0% 3%
Indiana 100% 0% 31% 0% 31% 0% 1% 6% 9% 0% 0% 22%
Iowa 100% 0% 40% 12% 37% 0% 1% 3% 7% 0% 0% 0%
Kansas 100% 0% 7% 41% 33% 4% 4% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Kentucky 100% 0% 7% 2% 72% 1% 1% 11% 6% 0% 0% 0%
Louisiana 100% 0% 0% 0% 74% 9% 6% 3% 8% 0% 0% 0%
Maine 100% 0% 35% 0% 48% 3% 4% 6% 6% 0% 0% 0%
Maryland 100% 0% 35% 0% 41% 10% 3% 9% 0% 0% 0% 1%
Massachusetts 100% 0% 5% 16% 72% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Michigan 100% 0% 9% 9% 16% 15% 16% 36% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Minnesota 100% 0% 28% 0% 32% 7% 7% 8% 15% 0% 0% 3%
Mississippi 100% 0% 0% 1% 83% 4% 1% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Missouri 100% 0% 16% 2% 42% 3% 1% 10% 20% 0% 0% 6%
Montana 100% 0% 16% 34% 38% 1% 1% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Nebraska 100% 0% 22% 12% 45% 0% 1% 0% 19% 0% 0% 0%
Nevada 100% 0% 3% 1% 67% 4% 1% 2% 5% 0% 0% 18%
New Hampshire - - - - - - - - - - - -
New Jersey 100% 0% 12% 0% 71% 1% 2% 4% 10% 0% 0% 0%
New Mexico 100% 0% 1% 5% 48% 0% 0% 33% 13% 0% 0% 0%
New York 100% 0% 14% 8% 36% 7% 7% 12% 15% 0% 0% 1%
North Carolina 100% 0% 13% 0% 85% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
North Dakota 100% 0% 35% 28% 27% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Northern Mariana Islands 100% 0% 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Ohio 100% 0% 38% 1% 61% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Oklahoma - - - - - - - - - - - -
Oregon 100% 0% 20% 3% 17% 0% 0% 14% 44% 0% 1% 1%
Pennsylvania 100% 0% 10% 4% 37% 3% 10% 6% 30% 0% 0% 0%
Puerto Rico 100% 0% 0% 0% 68% 0% 0% 23% 9% 0% 0% 0%
Rhode Island 100% 0% 26% 0% 67% 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
South Carolina 100% 0% 5% 4% 74% 0% 5% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0%
South Dakota 100% 0% 39% 9% 41% 0% 0% 8% 3% 0% 0% 0%
Tennessee 100% 0% 6% 5% 76% 3% 1% 3% 6% 0% 0% 0%
Texas 100% 0% 3% 3% 77% 8% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Utah 100% 6% 8% 6% 38% 8% 1% 32% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Vermont 100% 0% 32% 0% 46% 0% 6% 1% 16% 0% 0% 0%
Virgin Islands 100% 0% 0% 8% 86% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Virginia 100% 0% 24% 0% 62% 1% 0% 8% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Washington 100% 0% 29% 0% 46% 11% 8% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0%
West Virginia 100% 0% 40% 3% 50% 0% 0% 6% 1% 0% 0% 1%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 36% 0% 64% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Wyoming 100% 0% 14% 20% 19% 31% 3% 12% 0% 0% 0% 0%
National Percentage 100% 0% 14% 4% 57% 4% 3% 9% 7% 0% 0% 3%

Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2003.
2. New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type.
3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.
4. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
5. New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states.
6. Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003.
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income