FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
| Table 16 Child Care and Development Fund Average Monthly Percent of Families Receiving TANF (FFY 2003) |
|
|---|---|
| State | TANF (Yes) |
| Alabama | 8.10% |
| Alaska | 10.30% |
| American Samoa | 0.00% |
| Arizona | 20.40% |
| Arkansas | 41.50% |
| California | 13.00% |
| Colorado | 22.20% |
| Connecticut | 54.60% |
| Delaware | 14.50% |
| District of Columbia | 23.10% |
| Florida | 12.10% |
| Georgia | 17.90% |
| Guam | 31.90% |
| Hawaii | 19.40% |
| Idaho | 2.40% |
| Illinois | 8.60% |
| Indiana | 29.00% |
| Iowa | 42.70% |
| Kansas | 13.10% |
| Kentucky | 2.00% |
| Louisiana | 12.20% |
| Maine | 4.10% |
| Maryland | 11.80% |
| Massachusetts | 18.00% |
| Michigan | 18.30% |
| Minnesota | 22.00% |
| Mississippi | 0.20% |
| Missouri | 25.70% |
| Montana | 20.00% |
| Nebraska | 31.50% |
| Nevada | 34.20% |
| New Hampshire | 27.40% |
| New Jersey | 14.10% |
| New Mexico | 18.10% |
| New York | 34.90% |
| North Carolina | 7.30% |
| North Dakota | 15.60% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0.00% |
| Ohio | 16.80% |
| Oklahoma | 18.40% |
| Oregon | 33.00% |
| Pennsylvania | 12.10% |
| Puerto Rico | - |
| Rhode Island | 10.50% |
| South Carolina | 23.50% |
| South Dakota | 7.40% |
| Tennessee | 63.30% |
| Texas | 12.50% |
| Utah | 4.80% |
| Vermont | 15.30% |
| Virgin Islands | - |
| Virginia | 25.10% |
| Washington | 19.50% |
| West Virginia | 11.00% |
| Wisconsin | 10.50% |
| Wyoming | - |
| National Average | 18.30% |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2003. |
| 2. | National percentages are based on the "adjusted" national numbers unless otherwise indicated. In other words, the national percentages are equivalent to a weighted average of the State percentages, where the weights are the "adjusted" number of families or children served as appropriate. |
| 3. | The Invalid/Not Reported column includes families that did not indicate whether TANF was a source of income or not and the family was reported as being in protective services. |
| 4. | Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands were unable to report ACF-801 case-level data before report preparation. |
| 5. | Alaska’s population reported does not accurately reflect the population served due to sampling difficulties the State is trying to resolve. |
| 6. | Wyoming accidentally reversed coding of the TANF variable in their state system. A more accurate estimate is about 11% of child care families in Wyoming receive TANF. Wyoming was not included in the calculation of the national average. |
