Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income

The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

Table 1
Child Care and Development Fund
Average Monthly Adjusted Number of Families and Children Served (FFY 2003)
States/Territories Average Number of Families Average Number of Children
Alabama 17,600 30,400
Alaska 3,000 5,300
American Samoa 400 700
Arizona 17,100 29,100
Arkansas 7,500 12,900
California 102,800 153,600
Colorado 12,500 22,800
Connecticut 6,800 11,700
Delaware 4,100 6,800
District of Columbia 6,200 8,500
Florida 72,400 121,200
Georgia 34,700 61,900
Guam 200 200
Hawaii 7,000 11,200
Idaho 4,400 7,800
Illinois 44,000 85,700
Indiana 18,500 34,300
Iowa 8,200 14,100
Kansas 8,600 16,000
Kentucky 22,900 39,900
Louisiana 32,000 54,600
Maine 3,100 4,500
Maryland 18,200 30,000
Massachusetts 23,200 32,200
Michigan 31,200 61,200
Minnesota 14,300 25,700
Mississippi 13,200 23,300
Missouri 22,000 37,900
Montana 3,100 5,200
Nebraska 6,800 12,000
Nevada 3,600 6,100
New Hampshire 5,000 7,300
New Jersey 26,900 37,500
New Mexico 12,500 22,100
New York 83,200 142,700
North Carolina 52,300 88,300
North Dakota 3,000 4,700
Northern Mariana Islands 200 400
Ohio 29,800 52,100
Oklahoma 12,900 21,300
Oregon 11,900 22,100
Pennsylvania 33,200 60,700
Puerto Rico  -   - 
Rhode Island 3,700 5,800
South Carolina 14,100 23,000
South Dakota 2,700 4,300
Tennessee 27,000 52,100
Texas 62,900 117,300
Utah 4,700 8,900
Vermont 2,400 3,700
Virgin Islands  -   - 
Virginia 15,500 25,800
Washington 31,700 52,900
West Virginia 5,400 9,200
Wisconsin 10,400 18,200
Wyoming 2,500 4,100
Total 1,023,500 1,751,300

 
Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2003.
2. The "adjusted" numbers were obtained by multiplying the respective "unadjusted" numbers by the reported pooling factor percentage that was applicable to the ACF-801 data.
3. The reported results shown above have been rounded to the nearest 100. The national numbers are simply the sum of the State and Territory numbers.
4. All states provide an actual count of families served. However, the number of children served is not a direct count based on the fact that some States elect to submit sample data versus full population data. For States that submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families is determined and then multiplied by the number of families served to obtain an estimate of the number of children served.
5. Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands were unable to report ACF-801 case-level data before report preparation.
6. On an ongoing basis, CA serves a significant number of families and children through State funds. Beginning in FY 2002, CA recognized and corrected their reporting to show that only 86% of families and children are being served through CCDF (as opposed to 100%). The other 14% are actually being served by non-CCDF funds. Prior to FY 2002, NY reported children based on a payments system which allowed for a child to be counted more than once. Beginning with FY 2002, NY revised their reporting system. This has had the effect of eliminating double-counting. These changes lowered the national child counts by nearly 100,000 for FY 2002 and FY 2003 as compared to what was reported for FY 2001.
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income