Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Errata Sheet To, and Corrected Pages Of, Respondent's in Camera Post-trial Brief and in Camera Post-trial Proposed Findings of Fact [PDF 30K]
April 1, 2005
Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Amended Pages of Respondent's in Camera Post- trial Brief and in Camera and Public Post-trial Proposed Findings of Fact [PDF 30K]
Withdrawal of Complaint Counsel's Notice of Appearance [PDF 53K]
Respondent's Supplemental Errata Sheet To, and Corrected Pages Of, Respondent's Public Post-trial Brief and Public Post-trial Findings of Fact [PDF 846K]
Respondent Unocal's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Submit Two Additional Documents for In Camera Treatment [PDF 21K]
October 29, 2004
Non-party Shell's Third Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel [PDF 225K]
Non-party Chevron's Third Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel [PDF 225K]
Non-party ExxonMobil's Third Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel [PDF 228]
Non-party BP America's Third Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel And Union Oil Company of California [PDF 234K]
October 21, 2004
Order on Complaint Counsel's Third Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas Ad Testificandum [PDF 55K]
Complaint Counsel's Withdrawal of Petition for Expedited Review of Administrative Law Judge's Exercise of Delegated Authority Pursuant to 16 C.F.R. Section 0.7 and Request for Supplemental Order on Remand [PDF 90K]
Complaint Counsel's Petition to the Commission For Expedited Review of Administrative Law Judge's Exercise of Delegated Authority Pursuant to 16 C.F.R. Section 0.7 and Request for Supplemental Order on Remand [PDF 968K]
Brief of the States of California, Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania, Virginia and Massachusetts, and the California Air Resources Board as Amici Curiae in Support of the Complaint [PDF 61K]
Unocal’s Motion for Leave to Add Two Documents to Its Prior Motion for In Camera Treatment of Documents That Complaint Counsel Identify as Potential Hearing Exhibits [PDF 26K]
ALJ’s Order Modifying Scheduling Order Relating to Close of Expert Discovery [PDF 31K]
October 27, 2003
Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Unocal's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Gasolines That Match the Numerical Property Limits of Unocal's RFG Patents [PDF 756K]
Non-party ExxonMobil’s Second Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel and Union Oil Company of California [PDF 31K]
Non-party Shell’s Second Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel and Union Oil Company of California [PDF 28K]
Non-party BP America’s Second Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Complaint Counsel and Union Oil Company of California [PDF 27K]
Non-party ExxonMobil’s Motion for in Camera Treatment of Hearing Exhibits Designated by Union Oil Company of California [PDF 27K]
October 17, 2003
Declaration of William E. Stoner in Support of Non-party Valero Energy Corporation Inc.’s Motion for in Camera Treatment of Fourteen Confidential Documents [PDF 18K]
Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time for Non-party Valero Energy Corporation to File a Motion for in Camera Treatment of Documents [PDF 27K]
Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Motions for Extension of Time for in Camera Treatment of Documents to Non-parties BP West Coast Products LLC, Chevron USA, Inc., Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products, Exxon Mobil Corp., Motiva Enterprises LLC, and Shell Oil Co. [PDF 47K]
Notice of Appearance Filed by Rhett R. Krulla, Counsel Supporting the Complaint for the Federal Trade Commission [PDF 74K]
Notice of Appearance (for nonparty CITGO Petroleum Corporation), and CITGO's Motion to Join Unocal's Motion for In Camera Treatment of Documents Containing Confidential Business Information that Complaint Counsel Identify as Potential Hearing Exhibits [PDF 178K]
Motion for In Camera Treatment of Confidential Personnel Documents that Complaint Counsel Identify as Potential Hearing Exhibits, and Proposed Order [PDF 77K]
Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Gasolines that "Match" the Numerical Property Limitations of Unocal's RFG Patents, and Proposed Order [PDF 82K]
Unocal's Motion for In Camera Treatment of Documents Containing Confidential Business Information that Complaint Counsel Identify as Potential Hearing Exhibits [PDF 103K]
Non-Party Refiners’ Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Move For in Camera Treatment Of Hearing Exhibits Designated By Union Oil Company Of California [PDF 16K]
Non-Party Refiners’ Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Move For in Camera Treatment Of Hearing Exhibits Designated By Complaint Counsel [PDF 16K]
Complaint Counsel’s Sur-Reply Memorandum in Opposition to Union Oil Company of California’s
Motion for Dismissal of Complaint Based Upon Noerr-Pennington Immunity [PDF 116K]
Declaration of Sara A. Poulos in Support of Union Oil Company of California's Opposition to Non-Party Turner, Mason & Company's Motion to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum [PDF 8KB]
Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Turner Mason & Co.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash and to Respond to Union Oil Company of California's Subpoena Duces Tecum [PDF 34KB]
Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Western States Petroleum Assn.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Subpoena Duces Tecum Propounded by Union Oil Company of California, Inc. [PDF 31KB]
Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Non-Parties BPWest Coast Products, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Exxon Mobil Corp., and Shell Oil Products Co.s' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move to Quash or Limit Subpoenas [PDF 28KB]
Complaint Counsel's Clarification with Respect to Unopposed Motion of Turner Mason & Company for Extensions of Time to Move to Limit or Quash and to Respond to Union Oil Company of California's Subpoena Duces Tecum [PDF 108KB]
April 21, 2003
Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Unocal's Motion for Dismissal of the Complaint for Failure to Make Sufficient Allegations that Respondent Possesses or Dangerously Threatens to Possess Monopoly Power [PDF 1669KB]
Complaint Counsel's Memorandum in Opposition to Union Oil Company of California's ("Unocal's") Motion for Dismissal of the Complaint Based upon Immunity Under Noerr-Pennington [PDF 4950KB]
Unopposed Motion of Turner Mason & Company for Extensions of Time to Move to Limit or Quash and to Respond to Union Oil Company of California's Subpoena Duces Tecum [PDF 16KB]
Complaint Counsel's Withdrawal Of Its Response To Unocal's Motions For A Subpoena For The Production Of Documents From The California Air Resources Board And The United States Environmental Protection Agency [PDF 436KB]
April 15, 2003
Union Oil Company Of California's Opposition To Complaint Counsel's Request To Delay The Issuance Of Subpoenas To The Environmental Protection Agency And The California Air Resources Board [PDF 12KB]
April 14, 2003
Complaint Counsel's Response to Unocal's Motions for a Subpoena for the Production of Documents from California Air Resources Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency [PDF 2223KB]
[Proposed] Order Granting Union Oil Company Of California's Motion For The Issuance Of A Subpoena Duces Tecum To The United States Environmental Protection Agency [PDF 8KB]
April 3, 2003
Unocal's Motion For A Subpoena For The Production Of Documents From The California Air Resources Board [PDF 18KB]
Complaint Counsel's Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To File Response To: (1) Respondents' Motion For Dismissal Of The Complaint For Failure To Make Sufficient Allegations That Respondent Possesses Or Dangerously Threatens To Possess Monopoly Power, And (2) Respondent's Motion For Dismissal Of The Complaint Based Upon Immunity Under Noerr-Pennington [PDF 8KB]
Union Oil Company of California's Motion for Dismissal of the Complaint and Memorandum in Support for Failure to Make Sufficient Allegations That Respondent Possesses or Dangerously Threatens to Possess Monopoly Power [PDF 55KB]
Joint Motion For Entry Of Stipulation For Modification Of Subpoena Duces Tecum Served On The PBN Company And For An Extension Of Time To Respond [PDF 8KB]
Stipulation For Modification Of Subpoena Duces Tecum On The PBN Company And For An Extension Of Time To Respond [PDF 9KB]
Joint Motion For Entry Of Stipulation For Modification Of Subpoena Duces Tecum Served On Jacobs Consultancy Inc. (formerly Pace Consultants) And For An Extension Of The Date To Respond [PDF 11KB]
Stipulation For Modification Of Subpoena Duces Tecum Served On Jacobs Consultancy Inc. (formerly Pace Consultants) And For An Extension Of The Date To Respond [PDF 11KB]