Skip Navigation
 
Home | About CDC | Media Relations | A-Z Index | Contact Us
   
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
CDC en Español 
Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Legal Status of EPT - New York

permissible EPT is permissible.

I. Statutes/regs on health care providers’ authority to prescribe for STDs to a patient’s partner(s) w/out prior evaluation (Explanation)

 

II. Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) minus symbol Judicial decisions suggest that providing prescription without prior examination is physician misconduct. Carloni v. De Buono 245 A.D.2d 970, 972 (N.Y.App. Div. 1997); Balmir v. De Buono 237 A.D.2d 648, 649 (N.Y. App. Div.1997).
III. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)  
IV. Legislative bills or prospective regulations concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)

plus sign A08730 and S6210 authorizes a health care practitioner authorized under title 8 of the education law to diagnose and prescribe drugs for sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infection acting within lawful scope of practice and diagnosing a sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infection to provide antibiotic drugs to such patient's partner. A08730 was introduced on May 29, 2007; was passed by the state legislature; and was signed into law by the Governor on September 25, 2008.

V. Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices (including EPT) (Explanation) plus sign Any persons diagnosed as having gonorrhea, or those who have been exposed to gonorrhea, shall be treated with appropriate medication in accordance with accepted medical procedures as described in the most recent treatment schedule distributed by the NYS Dep’t of Health. Any person diagnosed as having chlamydia shall be treated by means of a written prescription issued in accordance with accepted medical procedure as described in the STD clinic guidelines distributed by the Dep’t. N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 10, § 23.2.
VI. Prescription requirements (Explanation) minus symbol Prescription must bear the patient’s name, address, and age. N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 8, § 29.2.
VII. Assessment of EPT’s legal status with brief comments (Explanation)

permissible EPT is permissible. Statutory authority expressly authorizes EPT for the treatment of chlamydia.

Status as of October 6, 2008
Legend:  
plus sign supports the use of EPT permissible EPT is permissible
minus symbol negatively affects the use of EPT potentially allowable EPT is potentially allowable
  prohibited EPT is prohibited

Select a state from the map or the list.

District of Columbia Maryland Delaware New Jersey Connecticut Massachusetts Rhode Island Pennsylvania New York Maine New Hampshire Vermont New Hampshire Vermont West Virginia Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Ohio Indiana Michigan Wisconsin Illinois Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Mississippi Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma Texas Puerto Rico Hawaii Alaska Montana Wyoming Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Idaho Nevada California Oregon Washington
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Colombia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Summary Totals

Exception: EPT is permissible in Baltimore, Maryland.

Page last modified: February 20, 2008
Page last reviewed: February 20, 2008

Content Source: Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention