NIST Polymers Division Banner NIST Polymers Division Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory National Institutes of Standards and technology
NIST polymers logo Side bar NIST Polymers characterization group logo NIST Polymers electronics group logo NIST Polymers biomaterials group logo NIST Polymers Multiphase group logo NIST Polymers processing group logo NIST Polymers combi group logo Side bar
 Our Publication:
 Group:

 Year:


 
 
button  HOME
button  Structure-Property Relationships in Dental Polymers and Composites
     button  Nanocomposite Dental Materials
  button  Structure-Property Relationships of Hydrogels for Dental and Craniofacial Applications
  button  The Effect of an Organogelator on Bioactive Dental Composites
  button   High-throughput and combinatorial methods for measuring the mechanical properties of dental materials
button  Combinatorial Methods for Rapid Screening of Biomaterials
  button  High-throughput Method for Determining Young’s Modulus of Polymer Blends
  button  Inflammatory Cytokine Quantification of Cell-SCK Interactions via RT-PCR
  button  Peptide Derivatized SCK Nanoparticles
  button  Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  button  Gradient Library Screening of Cell-Material Interactions
  button  Surface Energy Gradients for Characterizing Cell-Material Interactions
  button  High-throughput Method for Characterizing Cell Response to Polymer Crystallinity
  button   Cellular Response to Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Vinyl Conversion Gradients
button  Metrologies for Tissue Scaffolds
  button  Focal Adhesions of Osteoblasts on Poly(d,l-lactide)/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Blends by Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
  button   2D -->3D Cell / Scaffold Interactions
  button  Development of a Reference Scaffold
  button   In Vitro Cartilage Development
  button   Gene Expression Profiles of Cells in Response to Tyrosine Polycarbonate Blends
  button Broadband Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) Microscopic Imaging
  button Collinear Optical Coherence and Confocal Fluorescence Microscopies
 

line
 
 
 

High-throughput Method for Characterizing Cell Response to Polymer Crystallinity

 

Introduction

line
Surface topology can strongly influence the performance of tissue engineered medical products. Crystalline polymers used in biomedical applications, such as poly(e-caprolactone) and poly(L-lactic acid), can have either a rough or a smooth surface depending on how they are processed. When they are crystallized, the surface becomes roughened but when they are kept amorphous their surface remains smooth. Thus, we have used gradient technology to develop a high-throughput method for studying cell response to the surface roughness that results from polymer crystallinity.
 

Experimental Approach

line
Solutions of poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) were spread onto glass substrates with a home-built flow-coater to yield thin films of PLLA that were smooth and amorphous. The films were placed on a temperature gradient stage such that one end was held below the Tg at room temperature and the other end was heated above the Tg to 100° C. This produced gradients in crystallinity along the PLLA films where the room temperature-ends remained amorphous and smooth while the 100° C-ends became crystalline and roughened. The morphology of the gradients was characterized with atomic force microscopy and cell response on the films was assessed.
 

Results

line
 
AFM was used to determine surface roughness (RMS) of a poly(L-lactide) film annealed on a temperature gradient. The hot end became rougher as spherulites began to form.
AFM was used to determine surface roughness (RMS) of a poly(L-lactide) film annealed on a temperature gradient. The hot end became rougher as spherulites began to form.
Upper images: A poly(L-lactide) film was annealed on a temperature gradient and atomic force microscopy revealed that the hot end became rougher as spherulites began to form. Lower images: Cells (MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts) cultured (5d) on the gradient proliferated faster on the smooth areas as determined by automated fluorescence microscopy.
Upper images: A poly(L-lactide) film was annealed on a temperature gradient and atomic force microscopy revealed that the hot end became rougher as spherulites began to form. Lower images: Cells (MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts) cultured (5d) on the gradient proliferated faster on the smooth areas as determined by automated fluorescence microscopy.
Left: Cell counting using automated fluorescence microscopy confirmed that cell proliferation (5d, green) was enhanced on the smooth end of the crystallinity gradients. Cell adhesion after 1d was essentially equal across the gradient (yellow). Right: A plot of cell number versus surface roughness showed that the critical roughness for which a statistically significant reduction in proliferation occurred was 4 ± 1 nm.
Left: Cell counting using automated fluorescence microscopy confirmed that cell proliferation (5d, green) was enhanced on the smooth end of the crystallinity gradients. Cell adhesion after 1d was essentially equal across the gradient (yellow). Right: A plot of cell number versus surface roughness showed that the critical roughness for which a statistically significant reduction in proliferation occurred was 4 ± 1 nm.
 

Future Activities

line
Polymer crystallinity gradients could potentially be used for quality control screening of cell stocks intended for human implantation. Cell behavior on the gradients could be established and used as a benchmark. The behavior of different batches of cells could then be evaluated on the gradients as an indicator that they have not transformed, mutated or lost their phenotype.
 

Publications

line
  • PAPER: Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon Jr CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ (2004) High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to crystalline polymers: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 25, 1215-1224.
  • POSTER: Simon Jr CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ, Eidelman N, Washburn NR. “Gradient Libraries for Combinatorial and High-Throughput Investigations of Polymeric Biomaterials”, 7th World Biomaterials Congress, Australia, 2004.
  • POSTER: Simon Jr CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ, Eidelman N, Washburn NR. “High-throughput Methods for Biomaterials Development”, NIST Combinatorial Methods Center 4th Annual Meeting, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  • POSTER: Simon Jr CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ, Eidelman N, Washburn NR. “High-throughput Methods for Biomaterials Development”, Symposium on Metrology and Standards for Cell Signaling, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  • POSTER: Simon Jr CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ, Eidelman N, “Washburn NR. High-throughput Methods for Biomaterials Development”, RESBIO Kickoff Even, Rutgers University, NJ 2003.
  • POSTER: Washburn NR, Kennedy SB, Simon Jr CG, Yamada KM, Amis EJ. “High-Throughput Investigation of Cell Proliferation on Crystalline Polymers”, Society for Biomaterials 29th Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 2003.
  • POSTER: Washburn NR, Kennedy SE, Sehgal A, Simon Jr CG, Amis EJ. “High-throughput Investigations of Cell-Material Interactions”, Gordon Research Conference on Signal Transduction by Engineered Extracellular Matrices, New London, CT, 2002.
  •  

    NIST Contributors:

    line
    Newell R. Washburn
    Carl G. Simon, Jr.
    Scott B. Kennedy
    Eric J. Amis
    Kathryn L. Beers
     

    Collaborators:

    line
    Kenneth M. Yamada
    (NIH/NIDCR )
     
     
     
     
     
     
    line
    NIST logo
    Biomaterials Group
    Polymers Division
    Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory

     
    NIST Polymers logo