| 1. IMPACTS OF ATP FUNDING |
| |
A.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT & METRICS |
| |
1.A1. |
ATP Is Meeting
Its Mission: Evidence from ATP Evaluation Studies [PDF] |
| |
1.A2. |
Advanced
Technology Program Actual Performance Measures for FY 2006 [PDF] |
| |
1.A3. |
ATP's Evaluation
Program and the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) [PDF] |
| |
B. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND OTHER BENEFITS |
| |
1.B1. |
ATP’s Investment
Return To The Nation [PDF] |
| |
1.B2. |
ATP Improves Your
Health and Quality Of Life [PDF] |
| |
1.B3. |
ATP Improves Quality
of Life for the Disabled [PDF] |
| |
1.B4. |
ATP-Funded Technologies
for the Aging [PDF] |
| |
1.B5. |
ATP-Funded Research
Promises Improved Food Safety and Quality [PDF] |
| |
1.B6. |
Bringing Benefits
of Digital Mammography and Radiography To More People [PDF] |
| |
1.B7. |
Flow Control Machining
Technology Enables Economic and Environmental Benefits [PDF] |
| |
1.B8. |
ATP-Funded Optics
Technology Produces Large Energy Savings in Petroleum Refineries
and Distribution Systems [PDF] |
| |
1.B9. |
ATP’s Investment
In Component-Based Software Technology Generates Large Economic
Benefits [PDF] |
| |
1.B10. |
ATP Award Produces “Halo” Effect And Pursuit Of R&D
In The Public Interest [PDF] |
| |
1.B11. |
ATP Helps Firms
Build New Capabilities and a Broader Social Network For Innovation
[PDF] |
| |
1.B12. |
ATP-Funded Technologies
for Disaster Detection and Recovery [PDF] |
| |
1.B13. |
ATP Helps Overcome Barriers to Green Technologies [PDF] |
| |
1.B14. |
ATP's Investment in DNA Chip Technologies Accelerates Personalized Medicine [PDF] |
| |
1.B15. |
ATP Investments Have Resulted in Substantial Revenue [PDF] |
| |
C. FUNDING GAP AND OTHER POLICY RESEARCH ANALYSES |
| |
1.C1. |
ATP and The States
[PDF] |
| |
1.C2. |
ATP Helps Bridge
Gap Left By Venture Capitalists [PDF] |
| |
1.C3. |
ATP Award Important
For Early Stage Technology Development [PDF] |
| |
1.C4. |
ATP Award Addresses
Capital Market Inefficiencies for Developing Early Stage Technologies
[PDF] |
| |
1.C5. |
Findings from
Analysis of ATP Companies and Venture Capital [PDF] |
| |
1.C6. |
Understanding
Regional Innovative Capacity [PDF] |
| |
1.C7. |
New Method for
Identifying Early Stage Technologies via Patent Analysis [PDF] |
| |
1.C8. |
Venture Capital
Investment by Funding Stage [PDF] |
| |
1.C9. |
ATP and Venture
Capital Funding Criteria Differ [PDF] |
| |
1.C10. |
Venture Capital
Funding is Heavily Concentrated in a Few Industries; ATP Funds
All Sectors [PDF] |
| |
1.C11. |
Venture Capital
Funding by Phase of Technology is Increasingly Focusing on Later
Stages [PDF] |
| |
1.C12. |
Does a Funding
Gap Exist for Seed Stage and StartUp Ventures? A Look at Angel
Investors [PDF] |
| |
D. ACCELERATION AND HIGH RISK TECHNOLOGY ANALYSES |
| |
1.D1. |
ATP Stimulates Industry
R&D Investment [PDF] |
| |
1.D2. |
ATP Accelerates
Technology Development [PDF] |
| |
1.D3. |
Lessons from Unsuccessful Projects in the Advanced Technology Program [PDF] |
| |
E. COLLABORATION ANALYSES |
| |
1.E1. |
ATP Collaboration
and Related Results [PDF] |
| |
1.E2. |
Determinants of
Success In ATP-Funded R&D Joint Ventures [PDF] |
| |
1.E3. |
Participation
In ATP-Funded Research Consortia Increases Patenting Activity
[PDF] |
| |
1.E4. |
ATP Partners With
NIH To Accelerate the Human Genome Project [PDF] |
| |
1.E5. |
Advanced Technology Program Collaborations Extend Beyond R&D [PDF] |
| |
F. SPILLOVER AND DIFFUSION ANALYSES |
| |
1.F1. |
Customers Across
Many Industries Enjoy Benefits From ATP-Funded Technology [PDF] |
| |
1.F2. |
Diffusion Pathways
for ATP-Funded Photonics Technologies [PDF] |
| |
G. COMMERCIALIZATION ANALYSES |
| |
1.G1. |
ATP-Funded Projects
Are Realizing Commercial Success [PDF] |
| |
1.G2. |
ATP Funds Early-Stage
Technology Development: Evidence of Post-ATP Private Investments
in R&D to Bring Technologies to Market (Findings
from ATP-EAO’s Post-Project Survey) [PDF] |
| |
1.G3. |
Time To Commercialization
Differs Across Technologies [PDF] |
| |
1.G4. |
Technology Adoption
Indicators Help Determine the Likelihood of Technology Adoption
[PDF] |
| |
H. TECHNOLOGY AREA ANALYSES |
| |
1.H1. |
ATP Funds Energy
Research [PDF] |
| |
1.H2. |
ATP-Funded Biotechnology
Companies Show Large Gains in Technology Strength as Measured
by the 2003 MIT Patent Scorecard [PDF] |
| |
1.H3. |
ATP-Funded Projects in Telehealth [PDF] |
| 2. SURVEY OF ATP JOINT VENTURES |
| |
2.A1. |
Findings from
the Survey of ATP Joint Ventures [PDF] |
| 3. ATP AWARD STATISTICS (UPDATED
ATP AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT) |
| |
A. SUMMARY ATP DATA |
| |
3.A1. |
Historical Statistics
on Applications and Awards [PDF] |
| |
3.A2. |
ATP Awards Summary
Data, Project and Participation Table (Forty-Four Competitions,
1990-September 2004) [PDF] |
| |
3.A3. |
ATP Awards Summary
Data, Funding Table (Forty-Four Competitions, 1990-September
2004) [PDF] |
| |
B. BY TECHNOLOGY AREA |
| |
3.B1. |
ATP Awards Summary Data—Awards,
Technology Area by Year [PDF] |
| |
3.B2. |
ATP Awards Summary Data—Funding,
Technology Area by Year [PDF] |
| |
3.B3. |
Awards, Technology
Area (Pie Chart) [PDF] |
| |
C. BY STATE |
| |
3.C1. |
Table of ATP Applications,
Awards, Participants, by State (Forty-Four Competitions, 1990-September
2004) [PDF] |
| |
3.C2. |
Map of ATP Applications,
Awards, Participants, by State (Forty-Four Competitions, 1990-September
2004) [PDF] |
| |
D.
BY TYPE OF PARTICIPANT |
| |
3.D1. |
Characteristics
of ATP Award Winners (By Type of Applicant and Company Size)
[PDF] |
| |
3.D2. |
Distribution of
Funding of 768 ATP Awards, By Type of Participant [PDF] |
| |
3.D3. |
ATP Supports Small
Business [PDF] |
| |
3.D4. |
How Small Is a “Small” ATP
Firm? [PDF] |
| |
3.D5. |
Does Size of “Small” Firm
Affect Type of Project Participation in ATP? [PDF] |
| |
3.D6. |
Has The Size of “Small” ATP
Firms Changed Over Time? [PDF] |
| |
3.D7. |
Characteristics
of Large Firms in ATP Projects [PDF] |
| |
3.D8. |
University Participation
in ATP Projects: 44 Competitions (1990-September 2004) [PDF] |
| |
4.
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS |
| |
4.A1. |
ATP
Customer Satisfaction Survey Highlights from the 2002
Competition |
| |
4.A2. |
Applicant Perceptions of the ATP Proposal Process |
| |
4.A3. |
Applicant Views of the ATP Proposal Preparation Kit and Electronic Submission
System (ESS) |
| |
4.A4. |
Applicant Views of the Usefulness of ATP Information Sources |
| |
4.A5. |
Applicant Satisfaction
With ATP Staff |
| |
4.A6. |
ATP
Proposal Debriefing: Nonawardee Views |
| |
4.A7. |
Time
and Cost for ATP Proposal Preparation |
| |
OTHER
FACTSHEETS OF INTEREST |
| |
|
COMPETING FOR THE FUTURE: An Analysis of ATP
Funding in Photonics and Optical Technologies |
Are
you looking for quick information on the Advanced Technology
Program? The Economic Assessment Office
has written a series of factsheets that highlight the
Advanced Technology Program's performance and provides
insights into ATP's role in the economy. Results
are presented in categories that best describe the impacts
of ATP funding, findings from one-time surveys, and ATP
award statistics. These categories include: