CCMC is in the implementation phase of the "Flare Scoreboard" together with Sophie Murray of the UK Met Office and the international research community. The flare scoreboard is an automated system such that model/method developers upload their predictions automatically uploaded to an anonymous ftp which will be parsed by the system. The forecasts are shown on an interactive display of SDO/AIA or HMI images, and will also be displayed together on a graph of probability vs. time.
Quick Links:
- Flare Scoreboard - Click here to view the beta Flare Scoreboard showing real-time full disk and region forecasts on iSWA. Example of a past time period.
Tip: Use the arrows to step by 1 hr. - Flare Scoreboard API - Click here to learn how to download the original submitted flare forecast files from the database using the iSWA API.
NEW: Alternatively you can directly use the Flare Scoreboard API to retrieve text or JSON files with data from the flare scoreboard database (Heliophysics Application Programmer's Interface (HAPI) compliant).
➡ Active region forecasts are available in the Flare Scoreboard cygnet.
➡ Forecast probability vs time plots are available in the Flare Scoreboard cygnet.
➡ See the agenda/materials of the ESWW15 working meeting: Flare Forecasting: where are we and where should we be going?
➡ Flare scoreboard team members are involved in the ISEE/PSTEP "BenchMarks for Operational Flare Forecasts Workshop"
➡ The Flare scoreboard is part of the the Solar Flare Working Team in the Community-wide International Forum for Space Weather Modeling Capabilities Assessment.
➡ See the agenda/materials of the ESWW13 working meeting: Community-wide space weather Scoreboards: Research assessment of real-time forecasting models and techniques.
Flare scoreboard planning group:
Leads: Sophie Murray (TCD), Jesse Adries, Veronique Delouille (SIDC)
Please email Sophie Murray, Masha Kuznetsova, and Leila Mays with your feedback which will be shared with the flare scoreboard planning group.
Mike Terkildsen, Graham Steward (Australia Bureau of Meteorology, Space Weather Services), K.D. Leka (NWRA), Jordan Guerra, Shaun Bloomfield (Northumbria University), Masha Kuznetsova, M. Leila Mays (CUA/GSFC)
Currently registered models and particpating partners:
AMOS   Automatic McIntosh-based Occurrence probability of Solar activity |
ASAP  Automated Solar Activity Prediction |
ASSA  Automatic Solar Synoptic Analyzer |
BoM  Data-driven probabilistic flare forecast model |
MAG4  MAG4 LOS and Vector Magnetogram Forecasts (four products) |
Met Office  Space Weather Forecast (full disk) and Sunspot Region Summary |
SIDC  SIDC human operator moderated |
SolarMonitor.orgFlare Prediction System |
UFCORIN  Universal Forecast Constructor by Optimized Regression of INputs |
Flare Scoreboard Probability Timeseries Screenshot
First version. Feedback welcome.
Proposed forecast submission file format and Registration Questions:
Flare scoreboard functions and workflow:◦ Participants respond the questionnaire below to get started (see below).
◦ Participants produce probabilistic flare forecasts conforming to the file format (XML or plain text; see below). Additionally, occasional participants can provide forecasts by filling out a form, similar to the CME scoreboard. (Please contact Leila Mays if you would like to use this option).
◦ Flare forecast files are accepted by anonymous ftp, within the relevant subdirectory. Forecast files will be processed at least every hour. ◦ The minimum requirement for participation is a probabilistic Full Disk Forecast for M and X bins. Active Region forecasts and C bins are also accepted.
◦ Required forecast information includes: Forecasting Method, Issue Time, Prediction Window Start/End Time, M and X flare Probability. For Active Region Forecasts, Region number, Location, and Time is also required. See below for details.
◦ All information is stored in a database and is made accessible to users. Click here to learn how to download flare forecast files from the database.
CCMC Rules of the Road apply: CCMC requests that users notify the CCMC, flare model/technique developers and submitting forecasters before performing validation studies with the Flare Scoreboard database. It is recommended that such validation studies be performed with the knowledge and collaboration of developers and submitting forecasters/researchers.
◦ Probabilistic forecasts are displayed side by side on the "Flare Scoreboard" website.
Proposed forecast submission file formats:
Flare forecasts will be accepted via three avenues (click each for proposed template):
(1) XML: XML schema, , template, full example
(2) Plain text
(3) manual form input
Example plain text templates and description:
Full Disk Forecast: (red=required fields, blue=optional, use four dashes if empty: ----)
Forecasting method: MAG4 Issue Time: 2013-10-23T12:00Z Prediction Window Start Time: 2013-10-23T12:00Z Prediction Window End Time: 2013-10-24T12:00Z Probability Bins: M+ Input data: ---- #Full Disk Forecast #X_prob X_CI_Lower Upper X_Level M_prob M_CI_Lower Upper M_Level C_prob C_CI_Lower Upper C_Level 0.4000 ---- ---- ---- 0.6800 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Full Disk and Active Region Forecast with optional fields filled in:
Forecasting method: MAG4 Issue Time: 2013-10-23T12:00Z Prediction Window Start Time: 2013-10-23T12:00Z Prediction Window End Time: 2013-10-24T12:00Z Probability Bins: M+ Input data: SDO/HMI LOS_Magnetogram #Full Disk Forecast #X_prob X_CI_Lower Upper X_Level M_prob M_CI_Lower Upper M_Level C_prob C_CI_Lower Upper C_Level 0.4000 0.3000 0.4800 3 0.6800 0.6500 0.7000 3 0.7500 0.7100 0.7700 3 #Region Forecast #Model_Region_No. Time Location NOAA_AR_No. Time Location X_prob X_CI_Lower Upper X_Level M_prob M_CI_Lower Upper M_Level C_prob C_CI_Lower Upper C_Level 06 2013-10-23T00:30Z S10E00 12192 2013-10-23T00:30Z S12E00 0.3900 0.3100 0.4500 3 0.7000 0.6500 0.7500 3 0.7200 0.7000 0.7400 3 08 2013-10-23T00:30Z N05W35 12193 2013-10-23T00:30Z N05W37 0.0050 0.0000 0.0500 1 0.0200 0.0000 0.1000 2 0.0500 0.0100 0.0800 2File notes:
◦ Color coding: blue=optional, use four dashes if empty: ----.
◦ "Probability Bins" should be specified as "M" or "M+" depending on whether the method forecasts "M1.0-9.9" or "M and above"
◦ Probabilities and uncertainties should be displayed as decimal, not percent, up to four decimal places.
◦ Forecast files will be processed every six hours based on the forecast Issue Time of 0, 6, 12, and 18 UT. The files will be accepted within a file submission time cushion (±0.5h), such that event if the file is delayed, it is the forecast issuance time that is used.
Model/Technique Registration (*=required):
Information about your group/project:
Name(s) and e-mail (s) (please list primary contact first)*:
Associated Institution/Project name/Group name*:
Website url(s):
Logo(s):
Information about your method:
Forecasting method name*:
Shorthand unique identifier for your method (methodname_version, e.g. ASSA_1, ASAP_201201):
Short description*:
References:
Further Model Details:
(1)* Please specify if the forecast is human generated, human generated but model-based, model-based, or other.
(2)* Does your flare prediction method forecast “M1.0-9.9” or “M and above”? Would it be difficult for you to adapt your method from one to another? Which forecast binning method do you prefer?
(3)* How do you specify active regions in your model? Do you relate their location to other schemes such as NOAA or Catania? If so, what is your criteria to relate them?
(4)* Uncertainties given as an upper and lower bound is an optional field. Does your model provide uncertainties for the forecasted probability?
If yes, what percentiles do you use to determine your upper and lower bound? If you are using the XML format, multiple percentiles of the probability density distribution can be specified.
(5)* For each forecast, what prediction window(s) does your method use? E.g. Does your method predict for the next 24 hours, 48, and 72 hours or the next 24 hours, 24-48 hours, 48-72 hours? (This information is useful for displaying only comparable methods together).
(6)* For how many degrees from disk center is your full disk forecast valid for? E.g. 60 degrees; or 90 degrees (valid for entire disk).
(7)* Calibration levels are optional fields. Do you have calibration for the probabilities from your model? E.g. is a 40% forecast a “high” probability for your method?
If yes, please provide the probability ranges for what is considered a “low”, “medium”, or “high” level. This can be provided in a separate file, or as part of the main template, labeled “X_Level”, “M_Level”, and “C_Level” fields which can take the values 1, 2, or 3. These levels represent probability calibration for a model for each flare class. With 1 meaning “low” probability, 2 is “medium” probability, and 3 is “high” probability.
For example in the MAG4 model:
Probabilities in range → Level
Prob < 0.02 → 1
0.02 ≤ Prob < 0.18 → 2
Prob ≥ 0.18 → 3
