Cloud cover data from ground-based weather observers can be an important source of climate information, but the record of such observations in the United States is disrupted by the introduction of automated observing systems and other artificial shifts that interfere with our ability to assess changes in cloudiness at climate time scales. A new dataset using 54 National Weather Service (NWS) and 101 military stations that continued to make human-augmented cloud observations after the 1990s has been adjusted using statistical changepoint detection and visual scrutiny. The adjustments substantially reduce the trends in U.S. mean total cloud cover while increasing the agreement between the cloud cover time series and those of physically related climate variables. For 1949–2009, the adjusted time series give a trend in U.S. mean total cloud of 0.11% ± 0.22% decade−1 for the military data, 0.55% ± 0.24% decade−1 for the NWS data, and 0.31% ± 0.22% decade−1 for the combined dataset. These trends are less than one-half of those in the original data. For 1976–2004, the original data give a significant increase but the adjusted data show an insignificant trend from −0.17% decade−1 (military stations) to 0.66% decade−1 (NWS stations). Trends have notable regional variability, with the northwest United States showing declining total cloud cover for all time periods examined, while trends for most other regions are positive. Differences between trends in the adjusted datasets from military stations and NWS stations may be rooted in the difference in data source and reflect the uncertainties in the homogeneity adjustment process.
Trends in U.S. Total Cloud Cover from a Homogeneity-Adjusted Dataset
Authors:
Melissa FreeAffiliationsNOAA/Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, Maryland Bomin SunAffiliations
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research, I. M. Systems Group, Rockville, Maryland
Received: 26 November 2013
Final Form: 17 March 2014
Published Online: 24 June 2014
July 2014
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read JCLI Articles
(past 12 months)
. |
Newman et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 12
|
. |
Mears et al.
May 2016, Vol. 29, No. 10
|
. |
Poli et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 11
|
. |
Welhouse et al.
March 2016, Vol. 29, No. 5
|
. |
Cheng et al.
January 2016, Vol. 29, No. 1
|
. |
Dobricic et al.
April 2016, Vol. 29, No. 8
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
1. MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and ApplicationsRienecker et al.July 2011, Vol. 24, No. 14 -
2. Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)Smith et al.May 2008, Vol. 21, No. 10 -
3. Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingHeld et al.November 2006, Vol. 19, No. 21 -
4. A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration IndexVicente-Serrano et al.April 2010, Vol. 23, No. 7 -
5. An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for ClimateReynolds et al.July 2002, Vol. 15, No. 13 -
6. Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface TemperatureReynolds et al.November 2007, Vol. 20, No. 22