2011
|
Kiosk Supervision for the District of Columbia
By Jannetta, Jesse; Halberstadt, Robin.
Urban Institute. Justice Policy Center (Washington, DC).
The use of kiosk supervision for low-risk offenders and pretrial defendants is explained. The use of a kiosk frees up an agency’s supervision time to be used for moderate- and high-risk parolees and probationers. Topics discussed in this publication include: how the kiosk system works; kiosk supervision within a risk-reduction framework; challenges to implementing kiosk supervision; research and analysis regarding kiosk supervision; key implementation lessons; and conclusion. Through the use of ... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
7 pages
|
2011
|
Community Supervision Workload Considerations for Public Safety
By DeMichele, Matthew T.; Payne, Brian K.; Matz, Adam K..
U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance (Washington, DC).
American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) (Lexington, KY).
Two tools are described that will help the community corrections field become more efficient—a time study template and a workload matrix. “These tools, hopefully, will move the filed past the debate between caseload size and workload” (p. 2). This publication is divided into six parts: the misunderstood community corrections filed—more than evidence-based practices; framing the debate of workload versus caseload issues—the benefits of a time study template and a workload matrix for agencies, the... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
88 pages
|
2011
|
“What Works” in Community Supervision: Interim Report
By Drake, Elizabeth K..
Washington State Institute for Public Policy (Olympia, WA).
The supervision of offenders in Washington State communities and supervision contact standards are examined. Sections of this report include: summary; Department of Corrections’ outcome evaluation; evidence-based supervision; and what “evidence-based” means.“Our findings indicate that intensive supervision focused on surveillance achieves no reduction in recidivism; intensive supervision coupled with treatment achieves about a 10 percent reduction in recidivism; and supervision focused on the Ri... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
10 pages
|
2010
|
The Role of Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation in Evidence-Based “Real World” Community Supervision
By Bourgon, Guy; Bonta, James; Rugge, Tanya; SCott, Terri-Lynne; Yessine, Annie K..
The use of Strategy in Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS), a comprehensive model for community supervision, is discussed. Those individuals involved with community corrections and its increased effectiveness should read this article. It will explain how to transfer evidence-based practice into “real world” community supervision. Topics covered include: the emergence of the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model; the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision—program des... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
16 pages
|
2009
|
Maximum Impact: Targeting Supervision on Higher-Risk People, Places and Times
Pew Charitable Trusts. Pew Center on the States. Public Safety Performance Project (Washington, DC).
This brief explains how "a new strategy of targeted community corrections can help cut the massive and still rising parole and probation rolls, while at the same time saving money and reducing crime" (p. 2). Topics covered include: frontload resources -- targeting supervision at higher-risk times; impact players -- targeting supervision at higher-risk offenders; location matters -- targeting supervision on higher-risk places; and offender concentration allows focused caseloads.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
7 p.
|
2008
|
Testing and Evaluation of the Use of Polygraphs to Combat Violence Against Women
By Wilson, Douglas, B.; Batye, Kevin; Riveros, Roberto.
National Institute of Justice (Washington, DC).
BOTEC Analysis Corp. (Waltham, MA).
The use of polygraphy to manage high-risk domestic violence abusers is examined. The following five chapters follow an abstract and executive summary: overview; domestic violence in Dekalb County and the criminal justice response; the study; analyses and outcome for the results and previous efforts to predict batterer recidivism; and study conclusions. It appears that utilizing post-conviction polygraph testing "can assist probation departments to monitor effectively the risky behaviors of prob... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
50 p.
|
2008
|
Community Supervision and Rehabilitation: Two Studies of Offenders on Supervised Bonds
By Weatherburn, Don; Trimboli, Lily.
New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (Sydney, NSW).
"This bulletin presents the results of two studies bearing on the effectiveness of supervised bonds as a means of reducing re-offending" (p. 2). Study 1 determines if there was a difference in re-offending between offenders with supervision and those without. Study 2 deals with the quality of supervision and support offenders on supervised bonds received. The researchers find that "supervision did nothing to reduce the risk of re-offending," possibly because of insufficient supervision and suppo... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
20 p.
|
2008
|
Building Pennsylvania's Comprehensive Aftercare Model: Probation Case Management Essentials for Youth in Placement
By Torbet, Patricia.
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (Chicago, IL); Juvenile Court Judges' Commission (JCJC) (Pittsburgh, PA); Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (Harrisburg, PA); Juvenile Law Center (Philadelphia, PA).
National Center for Juvenile Justice (Pittsburgh, PA); Models for Change (Washington, DC).
The creation of an aftercare model that provides aftercare at the beginning of the process for placing a juvenile offender under probation supervision is discussed. Sections of this report include: introduction and background; probation case management essentials -- investigation and assessment, disposition recommendations and referral packet, the “Single Plan” idea, placement, monitoring in placement, and reintegration; next steps; and charts and sidebars -- five phases of Pennsylvania’s model ... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
36 p.
|
2008
|
Probationers and Parolees with Mental Illness: What Works!
By Skeem, Jennifer.
MacArthur Research Network on Mandated Community Treatment (Charlottesville, VA).
Copies of presentation overheads regarding the community supervision of mentally ill offenders are provided. Topics covered by this session include: the problem of supervising mentally ill parolees and probationers; improving supervision success; evidence-based practice; specialty caseloads; and implications for practice.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
28 p.
|
2004
|
Tools of the Trade: A Guide to Incorporating Science Into Practice
By Taxman, Faye S., et al..
National Institute of Corrections; MD Division of Parole and Probation; MD Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention; University of Maryland.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC); Maryland Dept. of Public Safety and Correctional Services.
The application of evidence-based research findings to the practice of offender supervision is explained. Sections of this manual include: introduction -- supervision as a behavioral management process to reduce recidivism; behavior and change; assessment and planning; communication tools; information tools; incentives to shape offender behavior; service tools; offender types; and guiding principles.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
91 p.
|
2002
|
Time to Work: Managing the Employment of Sex Offenders Under Community Supervision
By Seleznow, Eric.
U.S. Dept. of Justice. Office of Justice Programs (Washington, DC); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC); State Justice Institute (Alexa.
Center for Sex Offender Management (Silver Spring, MD).
The management of sex offenders "on the job in a way that adequately restricts offenders, protects the public, and simultaneously promotes successful offender reintegration" is discussed (p. 1). This report provides a look at: the importance of work; key elements in employment supervision; assessing potential job placements; establishing relationships with employers; using confidentiality waivers; making job placement decisions; and monitoring and follow-up contact with employers.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
12 p.
|
2002
|
Supervision of Sex Offenders in the Community: A Training Curriculum
U.S. Dept. of Justice. Office of Justice Programs (Washington, DC); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC); State Justice Institute (Alexa.
Center for Sex Offender Management (Silver Spring, MD).
Access to information and materials for three different versions (long, medium, and short) of training sessions about the supervision of sex offenders in the community is provided at this website. The following links are on this site: overview; issues and cautions; User's Guide; recommended readings lists; and curriculum download center.... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
5 p.
|
2001
|
Female Offenders in the Community [Videoconference Held July 18, 2001]
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This video examines the needs, strengths, weaknesses, and risks associated with female offenders. Topics discussed include: - The unique and complex issues surrounding female offenders;
- Barriers that female offenders encounter in the community;
- Techniques and skills for effecting positive change;
- Outside resources to assist in supervision;
- And the challenges and rewards of working with female offenders.... Read More
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_.gif)
1 DVD (162 min.)
|
2000
|
Effective Supervision of Adult Sex Offenders in the Community [Videoconference held February 9, 2000]
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC); Center for Sex Offender Management (Silver Spring, MD).
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
The goal of this videoconference is to enhance the ability of probation and parole agency staff (line officers, supervisors, and policymakers/administrators) to supervise sex offenders in the community more effectively. Topics addressed include: - Overview of sex offenders and their victims;
- The victim-centered approach to sex offender supervision;
- The role of collaboration in a comprehensive approach to supervision;
- The containment approach to supervision;
- Sex offender treatmen... Read More
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_.gif)
1 DVD (180 min.)
|
1998
|
Interstate Compact for the Supervision of Parolees and Probationers: Advisory Group Report and Recommendations, Phase I
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
The Advisory Group, meeting in June 1998,, agreed unanimously that the Interstate Compact for the Supervision of Parolees and Probationers should be amended in the interest of public protection. Key provisions would include the establishment of a nationwide governing commission charged with establishing the policy and practice of the ICS, as well as a mandatory funding mechanism to provide staffing and operation of centralized functions. Authority for rule making, rule enforcement, conflict reso... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
236 p.
|
1996
|
Community Corrections in America: New Directions and Sounder Investments for Persons with Mental Illness and Codisorders
By Lurigio, Arthur J., ed..
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Rockville, MD); National Institute of Corrections .
National Coalition for Mental and Substance Abuse Health Care in the Justice System (Seattle, WA).
Fifteen contributors provide ten chapters in this document, titled as follows:
1. The Challenge of Responding to Persons with Mental Illness on Community Corrections Supervision;
2. Persons with Mental Illness on Probation and Parole: The Importance of Information;
3. Offenders with Mental Illness on Probation Supervision;
4. Women in Probation and Parole;
5. Working with Seriously Mentally Ill Substance Abusers;
6. People of Color;
7. Juveniles: The First Frontier;
... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
184 p.
|
1995
|
Drug Testing and Recidivism of Houston Felony Probationers
By Wheeler, Gerald R.; Rudolph, Amy S..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Harris County Community Supervision and Corrections Dept. (Houston, TX).
Wheeler and Rudolph report results of a study on the impact of drug testing during pretrial and probation periods on recidivism rates among felony probationers in Houston, finding that successful probationers were tested and seen by officers a significantly greater number of times than unsuccessful probationers. They place their study in the context of previous research.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
36 p.
|
1992
|
Diversionary Effectiveness of Community Alternative Programs
By Whitehead, John T.; Miller, Larry S.; Myers, Laura B..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Tennessee Dept. of Correction (Nashville, TN); East Tennessee State University. Dept. of Criminal Justice and Criminology (Johnson City, TN).
Two programs (Community Corrections and Intensive Probation Supervision) implemented by the Tennessee Department of Correction to divert some felony offenders from incarceration are evaluated. Findings indicate that about 50 percent of offenders sentenced to these programs were diverted from an incarcerative sentence. A number of legal and social variables, such as custody status, drug problem, prior record variables and offense severity, explain the sentencing decisions of the judges. This stud... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
53 p.
|
1989
|
The Effectiveness of the New Intensive Supervision Programs
By Byrne, James M.; Lurigio, Arthur J.; Baird, Christopher.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC); Robert J. Kutak Foundation (Omaha, NE).
"This monograph examines the effectiveness of a variety of intensive supervision programs that function either as front-end intermediate sanctions or back-end early release mechanisms. Although it focuses primarily on intensive supervision, we also briefly highlight research on the effectiveness of house arrest, electronic monitoring, split sentencing, and residential community corrections programs." (p. 1) Observations on the research summary are presented by Greg Markley, Donald Cochran, and G... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
75 p.
|
1989
|
Feasibility Study for Implementation of Probation Supervisory Fees
By Green, Richard; Happmann, Gerald; Franken, John.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Wyoming Dept. of Probation and Parole (Cheyenne, Wy).
The study focuses on six areas: (1) Judicial support; (2) Agent support; (3) Flexibility in assessment and collection of fees; (4) Disbursement of revenues; (5) Potential revenue sources; and (6) Cost to collect.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017040401im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
20 p.
|