2012
|
PREA Standards Comparison: Standards for Community Corrections
Washington College of Law. Project on Addressing Prison Rape (Washington, DC).
Differences in the evolving Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Standards from 2009 to 2012 are noted. The PREA Standard number and standard content for the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission (NPREC) Standard (June 2009), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Draft Standard (February 2011) and the DOJ Final Standard (May 2012) are shown side by side with additional analysis (if provided).... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
118 pages
|
2012
|
Miller v. Alabama. Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
U.S. Supreme Court (Washington, DC).
“By requiring that all children convicted of homicide receive lifetime incarceration without possibility of parole, regardless of their age and age-related characteristics and the nature of their crimes, the mandatory sentencing schemes before us violate this principle of proportionality, and so the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. We accordingly reverse the judgments of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the cases for further proce... Read More
|
![_blank](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media__blank.gif)
62 pages
|
2011
|
Underage Drinking: Intervention Principles and Practice Guidelines for Community Corrections
By Crowe, Ann H.; Mullins, Tracy G.; Cobb, Kimberly A.; Lowe, Nathan C..
U.S. Dept. of Justice. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Washington, DC).
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) (Calverton, MD); American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY).
This guide provides “a set of guiding principles, developed from evidence-based practices, to assist community corrections in responding more effectively to underage drinking offenders. It is imperative for community corrections workers to remain fully informed of the actions they can take to address this issue” (p. 2). Five sections comprise this document: setting the stage—the problem of underage drinking; legal issues related to underage drinking; assumptions and principles for community supe... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
111 pages
|
2011
|
Evidence-Based Policy, Practice, and Decisionmaking: Implications for Paroling Authorities
By Carter, Madeline.
National Institute of Corrections. Community Corrections Division (Washington, DC).
Center for Effective Public Policy (Silver Spring, MD); National Institute of Corrections. Community Corrections Division (Washington, DC).
New parole board members and parole executives should read this publication. It “examines information emerging from research on evidence-based practice and decisionmaking in parole and the implications of these findings for paroling authorities” (p. viii). Five chapters comprise this document: evidence-based policy, practice, and decisionmaking—what it is and why paroling authorities should be interested in it; significant research findings regarding risk reduction—implications for paroling auth... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
43 p.
|
2011
|
The Future of Parole as a Key Partner in Assuring Public Safety
Center for Effective Public Policy (Philadelphia, PA); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
“This paper provides suggestions and examples about how these key decisionmaking functions of parole [which offenders participate in which programs, when, and for how long] can be shaped to target resources effectively according to the principles of risk, need, and responsivity” (p. viii). Sections of this publication include: introduction; historical context; the cusp of change; parole at the crossroads; resources to support parole’s new role; targets of excellence in paroling authority decisio... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
29 pages
|
2011
|
Paroling Authorities’ Strategic Planning and Management for Results
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Center for Effective Public Policy (Philadelphia, PA); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Individuals involved in making sure their parole agency’s goals are being met need to read this paper. It provides guidance for a paroling authority in “defining its vision and mission, assembling information and resources to accomplish its goals, and putting into place appropriate management and performance measurement systems to carry out its objectives and measure its progress” (p. v). Six chapters are contained in this publication: craft your vision and mission statements; assess your organi... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
33 pages
|
2011
|
‘A Courtroom Unlike Any Other’: Santa Clara County’s Parolee Reentry Court is a Case Study in Reducing Prison Recidivism
By Korber, Dorothy.
California. Senate. Office of Oversight and Outcomes (Sacramento, CA).
This report highlights the Parolee Reentry Court in Santa Clara County, California. It looks at the makeup of the Court and provides observations from its integrated team of judge, parole agents, probation officers, public defender, prosecutor, and psychologists. It also presents a perspective from a parolee, the proposal for the Court, and views from other counties. A table of California counties with collaborative justice courts is also included.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
22 pages
|
2011
|
Special Challenges Facing Parole
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Center for Effective Public Policy (Philadelphia, PA); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This guide is designed to “lay out the context, summarize the key issues, highlight the recent research, and provide suggestions about where to find more extensive and detailed resources” about special populations parole boards may have contact with (p. xiii). Seven chapters are contained in this publication: sex offenders; offenders who have significant mental health concerns; offenders who have significant substance abuse problems; women offenders; aging or geriatric offenders; youthful/juveni... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
64 pages
|
2011
|
Mental and Substance Use Disorders among Adult Men on Probation or Parole: Some Success against a Persistent Challenge
By Feucht, Thomas E.; Gfroerer, Joseph.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applies Studies (Rockville, MD); National Institute of Justice (Washington, DC).
Issues related to adult males with mental and substance-use disorders on supervised release be it parole or probation are discussed. Sections of this report include: abstract; introduction; methods; results for trends in the number of probationers and parolees, and substance use, dependence, and abuse and unmet treatment need among probationers, and rates of mental disorders among parolees and probationers over time; and discussion. There is significant need for the provision of treatment and re... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
16 pages
|
2011
|
Probation and Parole in the United States, 2010
By Bonczar, Thomas P.; Glaze, Lauren E..
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC).
Statistics regarding adult offenders under community supervision, either probation or parole during 2010, are presented. The number of offenders entering and exiting probation and parole is covered along with the turnover of these populations. Characteristics of adults on probation or parole such as sex, race, status of supervision, type of offense, most serious offense, maximum sentence to incarceration, type of release from prison, tracking by a global positioning system (GPS), and sex offende... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
52 pages
|
2011
|
Final Technical Report: Neighborhoods, Recidivism, and Employment Among Returning Prisoners
By Morenoff, Jeffrey D.; Harding, David J..
National Institute of Justice (Washington, DC).
The impact of the community in which an offender resides on that individual’s potential for recidivism and employment is investigated. Sections following an abstract include: executive summary; introduction; research design and data collection; results according to frequency and timing of recidivism, neighborhoods and recidivism, and neighborhoods and employment; and conclusion. It appears that “neighborhood context predicted both the recidivism and labor market outcomes of former prisoners” (p.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
132 pages
|
2011
|
Correctional Population in the United States, 2010
By Glaze, Lauren E..
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC).
This report provides summary data on the total population under the supervision of the adult correctional systems and highlights significant changes in the components of the population.” (p. 1). Data is provided regarding: total population under supervision and annual percent change from 1980 to 2010; defining adult correctional systems; community supervision and incarcerated populations which declined for the second consecutive year; prison populations—a comparison between the jurisdiction and ... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
9 pages
|
2011
|
Correctional Population in the United States, 1985 - 2010
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC).
"Presents data on the number of persons in the United States who were under some form of correctional supervision."... Read More
|
|
2011
|
Offender Exit Survey
By Carey, Mark.
The Carey Group (White Bear Lake, MN).
This Offender Exit Survey is given to an offender upon their release from community supervision. It is comprised of 11 questions ranging from “I was treated with respect by my supervising officer” to “Overall, I was pleased with how my supervision went.”... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
1 page
|
2011
|
Webinar: Evidence-Based Practices of Community Supervision: Part 2, What Works in Parole and the Prisoner Reentry Process
By Bartruff, Jerry; Lowe, Nathan; Rogers, Shawn.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance (Washington, DC).
National Reentry Resource Center (New York, NY); American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) (Lexington, KY).
“The goal of this webinar is to educate community corrections professionals on evidence-based practices (EBPs) of parole supervision, particularly with respect to the reentry of parolees leaving prison.” Participants will be able to: understand the core elements of EBPs and parole supervision; discuss the pros and cons of EBPs implementation; recognize leadership qualities that are conducive to using a successful evidence-based approach; and identify at least two practices that they could implem... Read More
|
![VIDEO](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_VIDEO.gif)
1 video file (103 minutes) + 45 pages
|
2010
|
Core Competencies: A Resource for Parole Board Chairs, Members, and Executive Staff
By Stroker, Richard; Burke, Peggy, ed.; Gilligan, Leilah, ed..
National Institute of Corrections. Community Corrections Division (Washington, DC).
Center for Effective Public Policy (Philadelphia, PA); National Institute of Corrections. Community Corrections Division (Washington, DC).
New parole board members and parole executives should read this publication. It will introduce them to the core competencies they need to have to effectively execute their public responsibilities. Chapters cover: the broad context of parole work—parole’s function, purpose, and role in the criminal justice system, parole and other state or local entities, and legal and ethical issues; discharging duties effectively—leadership, strategic planning, emerging best practices and evidence-based practi... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
49 p.
|
2010
|
Justice Atlas of Sentencing and Corrections
Justice Mapping Center (Brooklyn, NY).
“The Justice Atlas is a corrections data driven, interactive mapping tool ... [It] is distinct from crime mapping in that it maps the residential patterns of populations who are admitted to prison and who return to their communities from prison each year; as well as those who are on parole or probation on any typical day.” Statistics are provided per state (if given) for admissions rate, count, and expenditure, releases rate, count, and expenditure, parole rate and count, and probation rate and ... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
1 page
|
2010
|
Throwing Away the Key: The Expansion of Life Without Parole Sentences in the United States
By Nellis, Ashley.
The use of life without parole (LWOP) sentencing is discussed. This article is divided into four parts: the increasing use of LWOP sentences; misguided justifications for the use of LWOP—distrust of the criminal justice system, loss of faith in personal reformation, and the desire for retribution; concerns about LWOP sentences—the rising costs of an aging prison population, insufficient scrutiny used in many LWOP cases, and the U.S. being out of step with other nations; and a more sensible respo... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
6 pages
|
2010
|
Improving the Administration of Justice in Tribal Communities through Information Sharing and Resource Sharing
By Cobb, Kimberly; Mullins, Tracy.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance (Washington, DC).
American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY).
The challenges faced by tribal, state, and federal justice systems in sharing information and resources and strategies for successfully linking these resources together so that pretrial, probation, and parole officers can be effective in the performance of their jobs are discussed. Sections comprising this report include: background—tribal justice challenges; logistics; definitions; information sharing—what information needs to be shared, advantages to sharing information, obstacles and barriers... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
19 pages
|
2010
|
Public Hearing on Victim Issues in Probation and Parole, August 18, 2010: Recommendation Report
By Seymour, Anne.
U.S. Dept of Justice. Office for Victims of Crimes (Washington, DC).
American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY).
“Based on the testimony provided, this report provides a list of 10 recommendations for improving services to crime victims and survivors throughout the community corrections process” (p. 4). Also presented are excerpts from testimony regarding safety, information and notification, restitution, access to available resources, fairness and justice, respect and recognition, and offender accountability.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
15 pages
|
2010
|
Do Reentry Courts Reduce Recidivism? Results from the Harlem Parole Reentry Court
By Hamilton, Zachary.
Center for Court Innovation (New York, NY).
Those wanting to implement a reentry court in their community can use this report to show how such courts greatly benefit public safety. Six chapters follow an executive summary: introduction; the state of prisoner reentry; the reentry court model; study design and analysis plan; results according to recidivism and reincarceration rates, months to rearrest/revocation, role of duration, and predictors of completion/graduation (prior behavior seems to indicate future behavior); and discussion and ... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
40 p.
|
2010
|
An Elected Official's Guide to Community Correctional Options; Second Edition
By Layton, Linda; McFarland, Dennis; Kincaid, Diane.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Assitance (Washington, DC).
American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) (Lexington, KY).
Effective ways for using community corrections to reduce crime are examined. “Based on the latest research available, the practices and strategies identified in this guide are viable, evidence-based options for reducing recidivism and preventing crime while managing costs” (p. 3). Sections following an executive summary include: introduction; defining community corrections; dollars and sense—balancing public safety with prudent public spending; core components for effective community correctiona... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
61 pages
|
2010
|
Hardcore Drunk Driving Community Supervision Guide: A Resource for Outlining Supervision Challenges, Effective Strategies, and Model Programs
American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY); Century Council (Arlington, VA).
This guide is essential reading for community corrections professionals who have clients with extreme driving while under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI), aka hardcore drunk driving (HCDD), convictions. It "combines the latest in evidenced-based supervision practices with treatment strategies known to work with alcohol involved and DUI/DWI offenders … [it covers] supervision challenges, and where applicable possible solutions to those challenges, promising practices workin... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
52 pages
|
2010
|
Framework for Connecticut’s Fiscal Future: Assessment of Connecticut’s Correction, Parole and Probation Systems
Connecticut Institute for the 21st Century (CT21) (Rocky Hill, CT).
This is the second in a series of publications that assess alternatives to current programs and services that may potentially result in considerable savings to the state. This report “points out a number of interesting facts including the issue that there is no one criminal justice system in Connecticut. In fact the systems span two branches of government – the Department of Corrections (DOC) and the Judicial Branch – which leads to difficult management issues. The report also provides highlight... Read More
|
|
2010
|
The Importance of a Low Span of Control in Effective Implementation of Evidence Based Probation and Parole Practices
By Armstrong, Gaylene; Dretke, Doug; Atkin, Cassandra.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Sam Houston State University. Correctional Management Institute of Texas (Huntsville, TX).
This report explains why the current probation officer to supervisor ratio (7:1 span of control) should not be increased to a higher level due to significant impacts on the implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in the Community Based Correctional System in Iowa. Span of control is “the number of individuals, or resources, that a person can effectively supervise within a structured organizational, business of military setting” (p. i). Sections of this report followi... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
34 pages
|
2009
|
Community Corrections Centers, Parolees, and Recidivism: An Investigation into the Characteristics of Effective Reentry Programs in Pennsylvania
By Latessa, Edward J.; Lowenkamo, Christopher T.; Bechtel, Kristin.
Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) (Harrisburg, PA).
University of Cincinnati. Center for Criminal Justice Research (Cincinnati, OH).
The prime goal of this investigation was “to identify which community centers were successful in reducing recidivism for the State of Pennsylvania and to identify which individual and program level characteristics, if any, were significantly more likely to produce reductions in recidivism” (p.4). Sections in addition to an executive summary are: introduction; methodology; description of treatment and comparison samples and programs by facility type; multivariate findings; evaluation of programs ... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
206 p.
|
2009
|
The Release Valve: Parole in Maryland
Open Society Institute-Baltimore (Baltimore, MD).
Justice Policy Institute (Washington, DC).
"This report provides an overview of the current landscape of community supervision . . . and provides positive suggestions for improving public safety and saving money through the increased use and improved implementation of parole" (p. 1). This guide contains these sections: executive summary; what parole is; the cost of supervision in Maryland; Maryland's system of parole; policy recommendation -- move more people from prison to parole; policy recommendation -- improve the parole system so t... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
34 p.
|
2009
|
Interventions to Promote Successful Re-Entry Among Drug-Abusing
Parolees
By Prendergast, Michael L..
“This article reviews research findings on principles of effective correctional treatment and the interventions that have been shown to be effective with drug-abusing parolees or that have been tested with general drug-abusing populations and show promise for use with parolees” (p. 4). Sections address: principles of effective correctional treatment; re-entry interventions for drug-abusing parolees—cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), case management, contingency management, residential treatment... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
10 pages
|
2009
|
Heinous, Atrocious, and Cruel: Apprendi, Interdeterminate Sentencing, and the Meaning of Punishment
By Bell, W. David.
The impact of indeterminate sentencing on the parole release process is discussed. Sections of this article include: abstract; introduction; unsuitable life sentences -- indeterminate sentences are sentences with discretionary parole release, California uses both determinate and indeterminate sentences, California's parole release process, and prisoners serve much longer sentences then their enumerated term of years; which body find which facts -- parole discretion and unsuitable life sentences... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
80 p.
|
2009
|
Assessing Parolees' Health Care Needs and Potential Access to Health Care Services in California
By Steinberg, Paul.
RAND Corp. (Santa Monica, CA).
The health care needs of ex-offenders and their ability to get health care services are investigated. Sections following the key findings are: health care needs are high, but mental health and drug treatment needs are even higher; certain counties and communities are disproportionately affected by reentry, in particular Alameda, Kern, Los Angeles, and San Diego; access to safety-net resources varies substantially; and implications.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
4 p.
|
2009
|
Homelessness and Parole: A Survey of Denver's Shelter
By Peeples, Carol.
Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition (Denver, CO).
"Because of the gap in information about homeless parolees, CCJRC [Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition] decided to conduct this survey in order to better understand the drivers of homelessness among parolees and the experiences of both homeless parolees and shelter providers" (p. 2). Sections contained in this report include: executive summary; interviews with homeless parolees; point-in-time count; interviews with shelter staff; recommendations; and conclusion.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
25 p.
|
2009
|
Preparing Prisoners for Employment: The Powers of Small Rewards
By Piehl, Anne Morrison.
Manhattan Institute. Center for Civic Innovation (New York, NY).
The prisoner-release program operated out of Montgomery County's Pre-Release Center (PRC) is assessed with a view to its adoption by parole agencies. Sections following an executive summary are: introduction; Montgomery County Prerelease Program; comparison of PRC with prisoner-reentry best practices; providing effective incentives for work; and implementing a program of mandatory reentry accountability. Savings from this program are $6 million.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
17 p.
|
2009
|
Adult Time for Adult Crimes: Life Without Parole for Juvenile Killers and Violent Teens
By Stimson, Charles D.; Grossman, Andrew M..
Heritage Foundation. Center for Legal and Judicial Studies (Washington, DC).
While "[l]ife without parole for the very worst juvenile offenders is reasonable, constitutional, and (appropriately) rare . . . its continued viability is at risk from misleading lobbying efforts in many states and court cases that seek to substitute international law for legislative judgments and constitutional text" (p. 4). This report explains how this is supposedly happening. Sections comprising this publication are: sentencing under siege; manufacturing statistics -- 19-year-old "juvenile... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
90 p.
|
2009
|
Denying Parole at First Eligibility: How Much Public Safety Does It Actually Buy? A Study of Prisoner Release and Recidivism in Michigan
By Levine, Barbara R..
JEHT Foundation (New York, NY).
Citizens Alliance on Prisons and Public Spending (CAPPS) (Lansing, MI).
The impact of denying parole at first eligibility date on offender recidivism is examined. This report has these sections: executive summary; framing the question; research overview; significance of crime type; other key factors -- age, prior prison terms, and misconduct; the irrelevance of length of stay -- more time in prison does not increase success; how much does denying parole increase public safety -- very little if any; implications of research; and conclusion. The authors find that if ... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
74 p.
|
2009
|
Statement by Jesse Jannetta, Research Associate, The Urban Institute, at a Hearing on the Local Role of the United States Parole Commission (USPC): Increasing Public Safety, Reducing Recidivism, and Using Alternatives to Re-incarceration in the District of Columbia by the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service, and the District of Columbia
By Jannetta, Jesse.
Urban Institute--New York (New York, NY).
The “critical question of what constitutes best practice in parole supervision” is discussed (p. 1). This testimony is divided into five parts: the changing orientation of parole; seven organizational-level parole best practices; six case management-level parole best practices; implementing parole best practices; and conclusion.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
13 p.
|
2009
|
Interventions to Promote Successful Re-Entry Among Drug-Abusing Parolees [and] Response: Pathways to Recovery and Reintegration
By Prendergast, Michael L..
National Institute on Drug Abuse (Bethesda, MD)).
“This article reviews research findings on principles of effective correctional treatment and the interventions that have been shown to be effective with drug abusing parolees or that have been tested with general drug-abusing populations and shown promise for use with parolees” (p.1). Sections contained in this publication include: principles of effective correctional treatment; re-entry interventions for drug-abusing parolees—cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), case management, contingency man... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
13 p.
|
2009
|
Preventing and Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: A Guide for Community Corrections Professionals
By Abner, Carrie E.; Browning, Jane; Clark, John.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance (Washington, DC).
American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY); International Community Corrections Association (La Crosse, WI); Pretrial Justice Institute (PJI) (Washington, DC).
“The intention of this guide is to provide a general overview of corrections-based sexual assault as it relates to line staff and supervisors in community corrections agencies” (p.vii). Six sections are contained in this publication: sexual violence and community corrections; sexuality, violence, and the correctional environment; offenders as victims—the impacts and implications of offender victimization; identifying and working with victims; responding to abuse—the role of community corrections... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
64 p.
|
2009
|
Probation and Parole in the United States, 2008
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC).
|
|
2009
|
Implementing Motivational Interviewing in Correctional Settings: An Interview with Dr. William Miller
National Institute of Corrections Academy (Aurora, CO).
This presentation is an extended interview with Dr. William Miller regarding the utilization of motivational interviewing (MI) in correctional settings. Topics discussed include:
- Background of MI
- MI in corrections
- How MI works
- The spirit of MI
- Implementing MI
- MI applications and assessment
- Brief and one-time MI
- Essentials of MI
- MI roll-out and training
- The supervisor’s role
- MI research
- And implications for policy makers, supervis... Read More
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_.gif)
1 computer disk; DVD-ROM (142 min.) + 1 computer disk; CD-ROM
|
2009
|
An Evolving Field: Findings from the 2008 Parole Practices Survey
By Jannetta, Jesse; Elderbroom, Brian; Solomon, Amy; Cahill, Meagan; Parthasarathy, Barbara; Burrell, William D..
U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance (Washington, DC).
Urban Institute. Justice Policy Center (Washington, DC).
Results from a survey of the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) and the 13 Strategies as explained in the publication “Putting Public Safety First: 13 Parole Supervision Strategies to Enhance Reentry Outcomes” (NIC accession no. 023433) are presented. “The survey covered characteristics of the field offices, backgrounds of the administrators, organizational climate and culture, collaboration, training, use and support of evidence-based practices (EBPs), and supervision policies and practices... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
72 p.
|
2009
|
Responding to Stalking: A Guide for Community Corrections Officers
U.S. Dept. of Justice. Office on Violence Against Women (Washington, DC).
National Center for Victims of Crime. Stalking Resource Center (Washington, DC); American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY).
Great advice is offered to community corrections officers who are supervising offenders who stalk. Topics discussed include: what stalking is—stalking behaviors, prevalence, and what is known about stalkers; screening offenders; contact with victims; supervising stalking offenders; and collaborating with other agencies.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
16 p.
|
2008
|
Comprehensive Framework for Paroling Authorities in an Era of Evidence-Based Practice
By Campbell, Nancy M..
Campbell Consulting (Bainbridge Island, WA); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
A “framework that identifies the characteristics and competencies that paroling authorities must have to be effective in implementing evidence-based practices in the context of transition programs and services” is presented (p.8). These sections follow an executive summary: introduction; the impact of history on current reform efforts; the key elements of the parole process—the institutional, reentry, community, and discharge phases; the foundation of system effectiveness—evidence-based practice... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
103 p.
|
2008
|
No Chance to Make It Right: Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders in Mississippi
By Thomas, Holly A..
NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund (LDF) (New York, NY).
The need to eliminate the sentence of life without parole (LWOP) as executed in Mississippi is explained. Seven sections comprise this report: introduction; what life without parole is and whom it affects; how the sentence of juvenile LWOP came about; children tried as adults; characteristics of Mississippi's juveniles serving LWOP and the case against such sentences; conclusions and recommendations; and the chart "Juveniles Sentenced to LWOP in Mississippi."... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
26 p.
|
2008
|
Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2006-2007
South Carolina Dept. of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services (Columbia, SC).
Activities during Fiscal Year 2006-2007 by the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services are evaluated. Performance is measured through answers to a series of questions. Sections of this report are: executive summary; organizational profile; Category 1- Leadership; Category 2- Strategic Planning; Category 3- Customer and Market Focus; Category 4- Information and Analysis; Category 5- Workforce Focus; Category 6- Process Management; Category 7- Results (performance and... Read More
|
![DOC](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_DOC.gif)
59 p.
|
2008
|
Returning Home on Parole: Former Prisoners' Experiences in Illinois, Ohio, and Texas
By Yahner, Jennifer; Visher, Christy; Solomon, Amy.
JEHT Foundation (New York, NY).
Urban Institute. Justice Policy Center (Washington, DC).
Issues surrounding the use of parole are examined. Sections of this brief are: supervision practices in Illinois, Ohio, and Texas; analytic approach; findings regarding previous experiences on supervision, prerelease expectations for supervision, supervision experiences after release, attitude toward parole officer after release, supervision conditions and violations after release, affect of supervision on reentry outcomes (family and housing options, substance use, and recidivism), benefit of ... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
8 p.
|
2008
|
Findings from the APAI International Survey of Releasing Authorities
By Kinnevy, Susan C.; Caplan, Joel M..
JEHT Foundation (New York, NY); Pew Charitable Trusts (Washington, DC).
University of Pennsylvania. Center for Research on Youth and Social Policy (CRYSP) (Philadelphia, PA); Association of Paroling Authorities International (APAI) (California, MO).
Results from an international survey of releasing authorities (RAs) are presented. Sections contained in this report include: key findings; executive summary; introduction; survey design, implementation, and response rates; survey results for state agencies only regarding RA structure, scope, release decision process, time served and early release, supervision, violation of supervision conditions, revocations, and statistics and recidivism; summary; and findings from federal and other country R... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
70 p.
|
2008
|
Characteristics of State Parole Supervising Agencies, 2006
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC).
|
|
2008
|
Examining the Impact of Ohio's Progressive Sanction Grid
By Martin, Brian; Van Dine, Steve.
National Institute of Justice (Washington, DC).
Ohio Dept. Rehabilitation and Correction. Bureau of Research (Columbus, OH).
Results are provided from an evaluation of post-prison progressive sanction guidelines. This report has these sections: abstract; executive summary; introduction; organization of report; empirical and theoretical foundations of graduated and progressive sanction models; the Ohio Progressive Sanction Grid and Violation Policy; research questions; research design and data sources; analytic strategy -- policy implementation; measures used in policy implementation analysis; results -- implementation... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
129 p.
|
2008
|
The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole Handbook
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Harrisburg, PA).
Guidelines for the success of probationers and parolees in the community are provided. Sections of this handbook are: introduction; what parole is; when parole can be granted; inside the institution -- preparing for parole, employment plan, and home plan; what happens after parole is granted -- fees and financial responsibility; outside the institution -- how offenders are supervised and general conditions of parole; parole violators; finding employment; and getting the help you need.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
22 p.
|
2008
|
Probation and Parole in the United States, 2007: Statistical Tables
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC).
|
|
2008
|
Discretionary Parole, State Board of Parole: Performance Audit
Colorado. Office of the State Auditor (Denver, CO).
The Colorado State Board of Parole's discretionary parole process is evaluated. Sections contained in this report are: authority, purpose, and scope; description of the parole system; parole trends; Parole Board decision outcomes; and parole statistics. Recommendations for "improving the accuracy and usefulness of parole data" are provided (p. 2).... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
17 p.
|
2008
|
Restoring Parole and Related Processing for Categories of Violent State Prisoners: Findings and Recommendations II
By Goldkamp, John S.; Harris, M. Kay; Weiland, Doris; Vilcica, E. Rely.
Temple University. Dept. of Criminal Justice (Philadelphia, PA).
This report presents the second in a series of findings and recommendations . . . [from] a "top to bottom" review of the correctional and paroling process dealing with violent offenders in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania" (p. 2). Sections following an introduction are: overview of the comprehensive review process; timeframe and need for phased findings and reports; 15 recommendations; and conclusion.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
16 p.
|
2008
|
Adult Probation and Parole Directory
American Probation and Parole Association (Lexington, KY).
Access to information about probation and parole agencies in the U.S., Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands is provided at this website.... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
2 p.
|
2008
|
Evaluation of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s Violation Sanction Grid
By Kramer, John; Silver, Eric; VanEseltine, Matthew; Ortega, Chelsea; Rutkowski, Alana.
Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) (Harrisburg, PA).
Individuals using a violation sanction grid (VSG) can compare their outcomes to this study to determine where they stand. Those people thinking about implementing a VSG will be well informed on what outcome they can use to evaluate VSG performance. This report contains the following sections: introduction; background; the Pennsylvania context; the current study; data; results according to an overview, technical violations and criminal behavior, and parole re-incarceration; and cost and recommend... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
64 p.
|
2008
|
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment Among Probation and Parole Officers: A Case Study
By Getahun, Seble; Sims, Barbara; Hummer, Don.
This is a great addition to the scarce literature regarding the work satisfaction of community corrections officers. “Results indicate that employees are most satisfied when their occupational tasks are meaningful experiences into which they have input and are collaborative efforts with supervisors. Background characteristics of officers had no influence on job satisfaction, indicating that organizational culture and management style are the more important factors in explaining employee satisfac... Read More
|
|
2007
|
Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide for Probation and Parole
By Walters, Scott T.; Clark, Michael D.; Gingerich, Ray; Meltzer, Melissa L..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This publication "provides probation and parole officers and other correctional professionals with both a solid grounding in the principles behind MI [motivational interviewing] and a practical guide for applying these principles in their everyday dealings with offenders" (p.2). Seven chapters are contained in this guide: how MI fits in with evidence-based practice; how and why people change; the motivational interviewing style; preparing for change; building motivation for change; navigating th... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
100 p.
|
2007
|
Topics in Community Corrections, Annual Issue 2007: Promising Strategies in Transition from Prison
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
LIS, Inc. (Longmont, CO); National Institute of Corrections Information Center (Aurora, CO).
Issue contents are: “Foreword” by Kermit Humphries; “An Overview of NIC’s Transition from Prison to the Community Initiative” by Peggy B. Burke; “Rising to the Challenge of Applying Evidence-Based Practices Across the Spectrum of a State Parole Board” by Sherry Tate and Catherine C. McVey; “Collaboration and Partnership in the Community: Advancing the Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative” by Le’Ann Duran; “Providing Tools for Risk Reduction Case Management in Parole and Community Corrections” by... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
74 p.
|
2007
|
Rising to the Challenge of Applying Evidence-Based Practices Across the Spectrum of a State Parole System
By Tate, Sherry; McVey, Catherine C..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
LIS, Inc. (Longmont, CO); National Institute of Corrections Information Center (Aurora, CO).
The use of evidence-based practices to improve discretionary parole system is explained. This article is comprised of these sections: releasing the right offender at the right time; shifting to a case management model for reentry; designing a new technical parole violator (TPV) management program; development of statewide and local performance measures; and building a case for additional budget resources.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
8 p.
|
2007
|
Improving Parole Outcomes with Performance Leadership and Data: Doing What Works
By Hunter, Danny; Braucht, George; Prevost, John.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
LIS, Inc. (Longmont, CO); National Institute of Corrections Information Center (Aurora, CO).
"This article describes the evolution of the Georgia Parole Board's business-oriented data and performance leadership model" (p. 35). Topics covered include: business is data driven, government should be, too; Georgia's data-driven TCPI (Transition From Prison to the Community Initiative) plan; computerized information systems -- essential data to support accountability measures; managing with the right data; effective reports -- easy to access, read, and understand the causal link; performance... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
10 p.
|
2005
|
Correctional Statistics...In Your State
LIS, Inc. (Longmont, CO)
National Institute of Corrections Information Center (Longmont, CO).
(Updated in 2008) Access to statistics about corrections in the U.S., according to each state, can be found at this website. Statistics (per 100,000) for each state include: crime rates; corrections population; incarceration rate; community corrections--probationers and parolees; cost per inmate; and general information about the state's jails, prisons, and community corrections. Also provided are at-a-glance graphs that compare the state's ranking against other states and the U.S. total.... Read More
|
![WEB](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_WEB.gif)
1 p.
|
2005
|
Community Corrections Workforce Project Annotated Bibliography
By Stinchcomb, Jeanne B..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This bibliography describes 71 items that address workforce development problems faced by community corrections, probation, and parole agencies. Some of the topics discussed are: the changing workforce; the changing roles of staff; caseload management demands; and recruiting, hiring, training, developing, and retaining staff.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
20 p.
|
2003
|
A Handbook for New Parole Board Members: Part of a Resource Kit for New Parole Board Members
By Burke, Peggy B., ed..
Association of Paroling Authorities International (APAI) (California, MO); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Center for Effective Public Policy (Silver Spring, MD).
Issues related to the profession of parole are discussed. Nine chapters follow an introduction: "Parole in Context"; "An Overview of Corrections and Criminal Justice-Reshaping Parole" by James Austin; "Parole as Part of the Criminal Justice System and the Community"; "Parole Decisionmaking"; "The Parole Interview" by Robert J. McGrath; "Legal and Ethical Issues" by Richard P. Stroker; "Victim Issues" by Anne Seymour; "Transition, Violation, and Revocation"; and "Parole as a Profession." A gloss... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
101 p.
|
2001
|
Civil Liabilities and Other Legal Issues for Probation/Parole Officers and Supervisors
By del Carmen, Rolando V..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
The legal liabilities that probation/parole officers may be exposed to are examined. Eleven chapters make up this monograph: an overview of state and federal legal liabilities; civil liability under state law -- state tort cases; civil liability under federal law -- section 1983 cases; legal representation, attorneys' fees, and indemnification; presentence/preparole investigations and reports; liability of parole board member for release or nonrelease; conditions, modifications, and changes in s... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
205 p.
|
2001
|
Use of Risk Assessments for Parole Release Consideration
National Institute of Corrections Information Center (Longmont, CO); LIS, Inc. (Longmont, CO).
Findings from a survey conducted for the NIC Community Corrections Division are presented in this table. States indicated whether or not they use risk assessment for parole release consideration.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
1 p.
|
1995
|
Status Report on Parole, 1995: Results of an NIC Survey
LIS, Inc. (Longmont, CO); National Institute of Corrections Information Center (Longmont, CO).
This report presents the results of a survey of parole policies in fifty-two U.S. jurisdictions: the fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government. It describes the survey methods, summarizes the findings, and then presents the state-by-state data collected from each paroling authority. The data describe each paroling authority's recent policy developments, structure, discretion for parole release, parole release decisionmaking, agency discretion, public access, victim role... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
188 p.
|
1995
|
Intermediate Sanctions for Women Offenders
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Oregon Dept. of Corrections. Intermediate Sanctions for Women Offenders Policy Group (Salem, OR).
The Intermediate Sanctions for Women Offenders Policy Group compiled and analyzed qualitative and quantitative information on women offenders, the criminal justice decision making process, and programming resources available to women offenders in Oregon. This document describes the project process and presents the Policy Group's findings, observations, and recommendations. Topics covered include: supervision, probation, parole, trend data, offender demographics, and staff training.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
100 p.
|
1994
|
Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Population Projections
By McVey, Aaron David; Jones, Michael.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
National Council on Crime and Delinquency (San Francisco, CA).
This report presents projections for the Colorado parole population through the year 2004 using a planning simulation and projection model developed by the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. These parole projections are divided into parole caseload subgroups based on gender, felony class and parole legislation type.
This report contains: a summary of parole legislation; a summary of admission, release and caseload trends; a summary of the forecast method; and projected parole caselo... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
53 p.
|
1993
|
Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles - Evaluation of Structured Decision-making Guidelines
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles (Phoenix, AZ).
This packet contains the summary documents and working papers of a parole board that structured their decision-making process based on an empirical instrument. The document begins with a brief overview of the Structured Decision Making Project and then contains many attachments, including the coding manual and various forms used by the Board.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
53 p.
|
1991
|
Parole Law: A Practical Guide to Making Parole Decisions and Parole Policy
By Palacios, Victoria.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This monograph provides information about parole law for parole board members and staff, as well as attorneys who are new to parole. It can serve as a reference when general questions arise, but should not be used to answer specific legal questions. This document is NIC's response to the need for information on parole law to be readily available and understandable.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
35 p.
|
1990
|
Worker Safety in Probation and Parole
By Parsonage, William H..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
An overview of worker safety among probation and parole personnel in the 1980's is presented. Examples and trends regarding the victimization of probation and parole workers, along with guidelines for their protection, are discussed.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
74 p.
|
1990
|
Policy for Parole Release and Revocation: The National Institute of Corrections 1988-1989 Technical Assistance Project
By Burke, Peggy B.; Adams, Linda; Ney, Becki.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
COSMOS Corp. (Washington, DC); Center for Effective Public Policy (Philadelphia, PA).
The purpose of this project is to assist paroling authorities with their decisionmaking responsibilities by focusing upon improving policies and practices. Specific progress made by certain state jurisdictions is summarized, and lessons learned are presented.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
54 p.
|
1988
|
Civil Liabilities of Parole Personnel for Release, Non-Release, Supervision, and Revocation
By del Carmen, Rolando V.; Louis, Paul T..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Sam Houston State University, Criminal Justice Center (Huntsville, TX); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This document provides a practitioner-oriented discussion of legal liability issues surrounding parole decisionmaking.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
49 p.
|
1988
|
Current Issues in Parole Decision-making: Understanding the Past; Shaping the Future
By Burke, Peggy B..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
COSMOS Corp. (Washington, DC); National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
The move to abolish parole has subsided because of rising prison populations, which have put more pressure on paroling authorities to take a lead in managing the overcrowding problem. This is the paroling authorities' opportunity to show the opposition that they can manage their responsibilities effectively, and that they have a role in the future of criminal justice. Includes bibliographies.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
59 p.
|
1987
|
Structuring Parole Decision-making: Lessons from Technical Assistance in Nine States
By Burke, Peggy B.; Adams, Linda M.; Kaufman, Gerald; Ney, Rebecca Jo.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
Cosmos Corp. (Washington, DC); Center for Effective Public Policy (Philadelphia, PA).
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
50 p.
|
1985
|
Using Policy Simulation Analysis to Guide Correctional Reform: The Utah Experience
By Austin, James; Joe, Karen; Litsky, Paul.
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC); Edna McConnell Clark Foundation (New York, NY).
National Council on Crime and Delinquency (San Francisco, CA).
By analyzing current sentencing practices and dispositional guidelines for probation, prison, and parole caseloads and comparing these current practices with other well established correctional screening tools through statistical simulation analysis, this study intends to provide legislators with estimates of the impact of proposed policy modifications on sentencing, classification, and correctional population size.... Read More
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
54 p.
|
1984
|
Parole Selection and Abolishment and Determinate Sentencing Creation: Role and Influence in the Change Process
By Palmer, Joseph R..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
This paper is the report of a research project, entitled "Parole in the U.S.: Public Perception and Political Vulnerability."... Read More
|
|
1983
|
Success on Parole: The Influence of Self-Reported Attitudes, Experiences and Background Characteristics on the Parole Behaviors of Youthful Offenders, Final Report
By Wiederanders, Mark R..
National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC).
California Dept. of the Youth Authority (Sacramento, CA).
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
89 p.
|
1983
|
Success on Parole: The Influence of Self-Reported Attitudes, Experiences and Background Characteristics on the Parole Behaviors of Youthful Offenders, Staff Summary
By Wiederanders, Mark R..
National Institute of Corrections NWashington, DC).
California Dept. of the Youth Authority (Sacramento, CA).
|
![PDF](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20121017034817im_/http://nicic.gov/assets/img/icons/icon_Media_PDF.gif)
23 p.
|