Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative |
Program Background Program Design Amphibian Monitoring Environmental Conditions Monitoring Stressors and Causal Research Protocols Development National Databases Analysis and Reporting Partnerships For information regarding the contents of this page contact Alisa Gallant Site Map |
Concern for a worldwide decline in amphibian populations was initially voiced in 1989 at the First World Congress of Herpetology held in England. At this meeting, participants presented scientific papers and exchanged personal accounts of amphibian declines and disappearances. In 1998 an international meeting of experts convened by the National Science Foundation concluded that significant amphibian declines have occurred in protected areas not subjected to obvious changes in habitat, such as national parks, wildlife refuges, and wilderness areas. Based on the information presented at these and similar meetings, scientists concluded that the numbers and geographic extent of the reports indicated that the situation should be approached as a potential environmental crisis. Amphibians are considered good indicators of general ecosystem health because of their close association with various aquatic habitats and sensitivity to different environmental stresses. Habitat destruction has been shown to cause amphibian declines, but little is known about the effects of deforestation, highway construction, urban development, and other habitat changes. Additionally, little is known about the role that other potential stressors (e.g., contaminants, introduced species, climate change, ultraviolet radiation, disease, atmospheric deposition, etc.) might play in influencing declines. In response to these concerns, the President and Congress in 2000 directed Department of the Interior (DOI) agencies to undertake a national amphibian research and monitoring initiative (ARMI). Measuring, understanding, and responding to the effects of environmental change upon the Nation's amphibians is a daunting task that cannot be done by any single agency. For success there must be effective cooperation within DOI and with other organizations, agencies, academic scientists, and, particularly, the States. The USGS can provide scientific leadership for this effort because the Agency serves as the research arm of the DOI,
has a long history of employing research scientists who have pioneered studies on amphibian sampling techniques, toxicology,
and health-related issues, and has a nationwide organization that oversees other national monitoring programs. The USGS
has identified four goals for the Program:
Back to Top
One of the greatest challenges to developing a national monitoring plan is the highly regional nature of amphibians in North America. Amphibians occupy diverse habitats that require specialized sampling techniques. No single technique is capable of sampling amphibians across the country, and the factors affecting amphibians vary regionally. This diversity argues for a highly regionalized approach to amphibian monitoring and research. However, it is also important to integrate these regional programs in a way that allows for a national synthesis and for analysis at a wide range of spatial scales. The USGS has organized the ARMI Program around a pyramid conceptual model to achieve regional and national assessments of status and trends (Figure 1). Extensive and necessarily coarse analyses are being carried out at the national level (the base of the pyramid), while intensive efforts, geared towards population monitoring and research (including egg counts, population estimates, demographic studies, and other detailed population-scale work), are underway at a relatively small number of sites (the apex of the pyramid). The mid-level of the pyramid is where most of the analysis and reporting occur in ARMI, and is targeted at identifying questions related to potential stressors, and whether additional data related to those stressors can and should be collected. Back to Top Amphibian Monitoring Important elements incorporated at the mid-level of the pyramid conceptual model center around amphibian monitoring and
include:
Back to Top Environmental Conditions Monitoring
Back to Top
Stressors and Causal Research.
Research to date indicates that a host of environmental
variables including climate change, competition, contamination, disease, habitat
destruction, parasitism, predation, and ultraviolet radiation may cause amphibian
population declines or malformations. It is likely that amphibians are subject to
combinations of these stressors, and that the combinations vary by region and time.
Physical and fiscal limitations of ARMI preclude monitoring for all potential stressors at all
amphibian monitoring locations, but to the extent possible, the ARMI Program will link
collection of statistically robust amphibian monitoring data with environmental data to
support covariate analyses into potential causal relationships.
Protocols Development.
Due to the diversity of amphibians, habitats, and risk factors, development of methods and protocols
for an integrated program is complex. Existing methods have been adapted and new protocols developed
to meet Program goals. Adaptation, development, and testing of protocols is one form of product that
ARMI provides to interested users. Protocol development currently falls under eight categories: 1) amphibian
monitoring, 2) stressors monitoring, 3) trend analysis and correlation, 4) population, landscape, and
stressors modeling, 5) geospatial applications, 6) management decision support tools, 7) database management
structure, input, and output, and 8) metadata.
Back to Top Analysis and Reporting.
A variety of analyses are being conducted to assess the status and trends of amphibian populations, determine
biotic and abiotic stressors, and improve understanding of the relationships between amphibians and environment.
The results are used for regional and national syntheses, to provide feedback for determining whether changes in
protocols, monitoring strategies, and/or research activities should be considered, and as input for decision support
tools for land managers and policymakers. Reports include descriptions of field and laboratory activities, status
and progress reports, methods and protocol documentation, field survey raw data and summaries, environment-amphibian
association studies, summaries of stressors research and findings, and administrative summaries regarding operational
challenges and integration of partners.
[View ARMI publications]
Partnerships. This is a critical component of the ARMI Program, as no agency has sufficient resources for sole implementation of a national assessment and monitoring program for amphibians. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, and the Bureau of Land Management also have requirements for understanding the status and trends of amphibians to make management and policy decisions. Other federal partners, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USDA Forest Service, and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service also utilize the information collected by the USGS to make decisions about environmental regulations, land management, conservation incentive policies, and landowner education needs. |
U.S. Department of the Interior |
U.S. Geological Survey | Earth Resources Observation & Science (EROS) URL: http://armi.usgs.gov/ Maintainer: EROS Web Master Last Update: March 7, 2006 Privacy Statement Disclaimer Accessibility FOIA |