1. Conduct
Experimental Tests
|
|
Can save money by providing a more
accurate service life value instead of relying on conservative assumptions made by other methods
|
|
Most reliable method, especially for multiple contaminants
|
|
Can be used to validate an existing change schedule
|
|
Will likely take time and money to perform the tests
|
2. Use the
Manufacturer's Recommendation
|
|
Can result in a more accurate estimate for your particular brand of
respirator
|
|
Relies on the manufacturer's broad knowledge and expertise
|
|
May not be possible if the manufacturer is unable to provide a
recommendation
|
|
May not account for all workplace and user factors adequately
|
|
|
Inexpensive and takes little time
|
|
Requires no math calculations if you use the Advisor Genius
|
|
Not as accurate as experimental testing. May result in a service life
estimate that is shorter than it needs to be due to conservative assumptions
|
|
Generally limited to single contaminant situations
|