Part
IV Table of Contents
IV. Section: Unavoidable
Adverse Environmental or Socioeconomic Effects
Specific environmental and socioeconomic effects of each proposed
regulation are included throughout the environmental consequences
section of the preferred alternative. The net environmental and
socioeconomic effects of designating the Sanctuary and implementing
the Sanctuary Management Plan and regulations are estimated to
be positive. While such effects are difficult to quantify, the
goals of the Sanctuary in part will be to maintain or improve
water quality, fisheries, aesthetics and tourism without causing
any adverse effects.
The proposed final Sanctuary regulations would allow all activities
to be conducted in the Sanctuary except for a relatively narrow
range of prohibited activities (subject to all prohibitions, restrictions
and conditions validly imposed by any other authority of competent
jurisdiction, and subject to the liability established by Section
312 of the Act). The procedures proposed in these regulations
for applying for National Marine Sanctuary permits to conduct
otherwise prohibited activities, for requesting certifications
for existing licenses, permits, approvals, other authorizations
or rights authorizing the, and requesting approval of, conduct
of a prohibited activity, and for notifying NOAA of applications
for authorizations to conduct a prohibited activity, would impose
a cost in time and effort on the part of applicants for such permits
or certifications/approvals. However, NOAA will keep such costs
to a minimum by working closely with State and Federal regulatory
and permitting agencies to avoid any duplication of effort and
setting guidelines for expeditious review of applications.
The regulations prohibiting discharges and deposits and alteration
of or construction on the seabed may require permit holders or
applicants for such activities to seek other areas of disposal
or apply higher levels of treatment. All measures, terms and conditions
applied to existing activities will be done in consultation with
the affected party and the appropriate management agency. The
MOA is intended, in part, to avoid adverse socioeconomic impacts
on dischargers in the area while at the same time, increasing
environmental protection by coordinating NOAA actions with existing
Federal and state agencies.
Estimates of revenue foregone by the proposed prohibition of
oil, gas and mineral activities within the Sanctuary boundary
has been presented in detail under the socioeconomic consequences
for this proposed final regulation. Balancing the foregone revenue
would be the adverse environmental and socioeconomic effects avoided
by the proposed prohibition. For example, the proposed prohibition
may alleviate or remove matters ranging from costs to local communities
for developing on-shore facilities to political and legal action
resulting from public controversy and apprehension concerning
proposed oil and gas activities.
It is not possible to quantify the positive socioeconomic effects
of prohibiting OCS oil and gas activities. The recent NAS study
(1989) on the Adequacy of Environmental Information For Outer
Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Decisions: Florida and California
found that "few data have been collected by MMS or anyone else
to address the social and economic impacts of OCS activities".
Section
V
Part
IV Table of Contents
|