Accessibility Skip to Top Navigation Skip to Main Content Home  |  Change Text Size  |  Contact IRS  |  About IRS  |  Site Map  |  Español  |  Help  

4.36.4  Joint Committee Specialist Procedures

4.36.4.1  (08-15-2004)
Case Receipt

  1. Upon receipt of a closed case, the Joint Committee Specialist will determine the correct statute date. Letter 1573A (P) will be prepared and mailed to the taxpayer and the authorized representative, if applicable. This advises them of the receipt of the case in the Joint Committee Specialist Group and of the Joint Committee review process. See Exhibit 4.36.4-1. In addition, an e-mail will be sent to notify the team manager of the case receipt.

  2. Upon receipt of an on-site referral, the Joint Committee Specialist will contact the team manager or examiner to advise them of the assignment.

4.36.4.2  (08-15-2004)
Case Review

  1. There are two types of reviews that may be conducted by Joint Committee Specialists. The first, referred to as a " closed case review" , is conducted after the examination group has closed the case to Case Processing Support (CPS). The second, referred to as an "on site review" , is conducted concurrently while the examination is being conducted.

  2. The specialist will perform a focused review of both the technical and procedural aspects of the case

4.36.4.2.1  (08-15-2004)
Scope of Review

  1. At the initial stage of the review, the specialist will develop a review plan. The review plan will identify the scope and depth of the review to be conducted. The review plan should consider the following:

    1. The scope and depth of the examiner’s audit plan,

    2. The extent of Counsel, ISPs or issue specialist involvement,

    3. Whether Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) were considered,

    4. The examination team’s understanding and adherence to the Joint Committee process and procedures as outlined in the IRM,

    5. Where applicable, the timeliness of the on-site referral,

    6. The materiality of the examined issues and compliance factors relative to the examined issues, and

    7. Issue management initiatives (i.e. LIFE Audits, Fast Track Settlement program, etc.).

  2. The specialist’s review is generally focused on the examined issues. Managerial approval is required prior to expanding the scope of the review to areas that are not reflected in the RAR. Should the Joint Committee Specialist believe that there is reason to expand the scope of the review beyond this, the approval of the Joint Committee Team Manager will be secured first. Approval by the Joint Committee Team Manager to expand the scope of the review will be evidenced by the signature of that manager.

  3. On a LIFE audit, the specialist may not request information on items below the thresholds established in the LIFE Memorandum of Understanding.

  4. Any large, unusual, or questionable items noted during the review that were not examined should be discussed with the examination team or the team manager.

  5. The review plan is part of a dynamic process and subject to change as the review progresses.

4.36.4.2.2  (08-15-2004)
Closed Case Review

  1. A closed case review is conducted after the case has been forwarded from the examining group to the local CPS. The local CPS in turn forwards the case to the Joint Committee Specialist group designated to service that location.

  2. The Joint Committee Specialist conducts the review of the case including the Revenue Agent’s Report (RAR) and supporting documentation and prepares the report. This is done at the specialist’s post-of-duty.

4.36.4.2.3  (08-15-2004)
On-site Review

  1. On site reviews are conducted at the examination site while the examination is in process. The Joint Committee Specialist will advise the team of the review process, the requirements for the preparation of the report to Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and the attendant reporting and documentation requirements shortly after the on site referral is assigned. The specialist will prepare the JCT report simultaneously with the concluding stages of the examination. The on site review achieves efficiency through increased communication between the examiner and the Joint Committee Specialist and by reducing the time span between the point the examination group closes the case to CPS and the time when the report is forwarded to JCT.

  2. The Joint Committee Specialist should contact the examiner or team coordinator within five days of the assignment of the referral.

  3. Where the examiner recognizes the need for a report to JCT during the planning process, and makes a referral to the Joint Committee Specialist group, the Joint Committee Specialist should participate in the strategy meeting. During this meeting the specialist should acquaint the examiner with the requirements and procedures for the preparation of a report to JCT.

  4. In instances where a referral is received after the planning phase of an examination, the Joint Committee Specialist will contact the examiner within five days of assignment and will advise the team of the requirements for the preparation of the report to JCT and the attendant report and documentation requirements. This may be done by telephone or visit to the examination site, whichever is most efficient under the circumstances.

  5. As the examination progresses it will generally not be necessary for the Joint Committee Specialist to make continuous or ongoing visitations to the examination site. However, the specialist should periodically contact the examiner to learn the status of the examination, the continued need for a report to JCT, and to determine when the specialist’s presence at the examination site is warranted.

  6. The Joint Committee Specialist will generally conduct the review and preparation of the report as the examination reaches the final stages. The examination site visitations should occur when there are a sufficient number of Notices of Proposed Adjustment issued/pending to be effective.

  7. Joint Committee Specialists who conduct on site reviews should plan their activities such that the report for the JCT is completed at or slightly prior to the group’s ability to close the case to CPS.

  8. Should a Joint Committee Specialist foresee that present or other assignments may hamper this objective, the situation should be discussed with the Joint Committee Team Manager. The manager will be responsible for adjusting workload assignments, as resources permit, within the group to accomplish program goals.

  9. The Joint Committee Specialist is required to perform the review and write the Joint Committee report by the completion of the examination. However, the review process will not delay the timely closing of the examination. In the event the Joint Committee Specialist has not either completed the preparation of the report or received a clearance letter when the group is otherwise ready to close the case, the team manager should forward the appropriate files to the Joint Committee group. The AIMS status code may be updated to status 20 with the approval of the Joint Committee Team Manager.

4.36.4.3  (08-15-2004)
Case Return Criteria

  1. The Case Return Criteria, reflected below, identify those errors that are significant enough to warrant return of the case to the group for correction. Cases returned under these criteria must reflect a clear error of substantial magnitude and not merely a "possible " or "potential" error. Cases will be returned to the group only after concurrence between the Joint Committee Specialist and the Joint Committee Team Manager. In significant cases, the Joint Committee Specialist or the Joint Committee Team Manager should contact the examiner or examination team manager prior to returning the case.

  2. The following are examples of when a case should be returned to the group:

    (a)   Substantial error -
      (i) A substantial error may involve a misapplication or misinterpretation of the law, a clear misapplication of facts or the clearly erroneous omission of an issue or item. In determining whether substantial error exists, reference should be made, not only to the overall dollar value of the item, but also its materiality. Materiality encompasses timing issues and other considerations in identifying those items most relevant and consequential in determining the correct tax.
      (ii) Because it is not the function of the Joint Committee Review Specialist to re-audit the case, evidence of substantial error will generally be confined to the Revenue Agent's Report (RAR) and the workpapers relevant to those issues. However, where there is reason to believe, beyond mere suspicion, that a substantial error exists, the Joint Committee Specialist must obtain the consent of the Joint Committee Team Manager before expanding the review to other areas.
    (b)   There is evidence of fraud, malfeasance, collusion, concealment, or misrepresentation by the taxpayer or representative.
    (c)   The existence of other circumstances indicating that failure to return the case would be a serious administrative omission. Cases should be returned if:
      (i) Failure to do so could potentially lead to serious criticism of the Service’s administration of the tax laws,
      (ii) The position, if left uncorrected, would establish a precedent that would seriously hamper subsequent attempts by the Service to take corrective action, or
      (iii) Would result in inconsistent treatment of similarly situated taxpayers.
    (d)   The case cannot be processed by CPS and the errors cannot be corrected by the Joint Committee Specialist without significant effort. (i.e. case requires new agreements, AIMS establishment, etc.)
    (e)   The correction of the error is favorable to the taxpayer.
  3. Every effort should be made to resolve inquiries informally. If the examining group needs more than 30 days to resolve the inquiry then a written memorandum should be prepared outlining the specific information requested and returned to the examiner via a Case Return Transmittal (CRT).

  4. If the examiner and team manager do not agree with the position taken by the Joint Committee Specialist or the Refund Counsel, the administrative file will be returned via a CRT. Generally, Area Counsel should be consulted. If the differences cannot be resolved in a mutually satisfactory manner, the dispute will be elevated to the appropriate management official. See Exhibit 4.36.4–4

  5. Refer to Exhibit 4.36.3-5 for response timeframes and status updates.

4.36.4.4  (08-15-2004)
Processing of Joint Committee Report

  1. Upon completion of the review the Joint Committee Specialist will:

    1. Prepare the report to the Chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation (see IRM 4.36.5) in the final form,

    2. Complete and attach two copies of Form 4081 (Transmittal Memorandum-Joint Committee Case).

    3. Have the proper official sign the report. See Delegation Order 154, as revised. Electronic signatures are encouraged and should be used when appropriate.

    4. Promptly forward the report, by Express Overnight mail, to the Joint Committee Program Analyst. See IRM 4.36.5.7.1 for the address instructions. No more than two business days should elapse between signature and mailing. See Exhibit 4.36.3-5 for a summary of all applicable timeframes.)

    5. See IRM 4.36.5.3 and exhibit 4.36.5–7 for proper file assembly.

4.36.4.5  (08-15-2004)
Inquiries from Joint Committee on Taxation

  1. There are times when it may be necessary for a JCT staff attorney to contact the Joint Committee Specialist for additional information or clarification regarding a case. Inquiries should be treated with the highest priority.

  2. If the Joint Committee Specialist is unable to answer the staff attorney’s questions, the specialist may contact the examiner or arrange for the examiner to contact the staff attorney directly. If the examiner is in direct contact with the staff attorney, the specialist will remain involved and ensure that the attorney receives a timely and satisfactory response.

  3. In cases referred back to the examination group for reconsideration that are subsequently protested and resolved by Appeals, the Appeals Officer will prepare the response to the JCT inquiry. However, at the time the case is transferred to Appeals the Joint Committee Specialist will prepare an interim reply briefly discussing the issues raised by the JCT, indicating the status of the case and attaching copies of the revised RAR and the taxpayer’s protest.

  4. This reply will be forwarded to the Joint Committee Program Analyst who will submit it to the JCT.

4.36.4.5.1  (08-15-2004)
Types of Inquiries

  1. There are two types of inquires that may be made by the JCT:

    1. Informal – Telephone or e-mail.

    2. Formal – Written memorandum via Staff Review Memorandum (SRM)

4.36.4.5.2  (08-15-2004)
Response Timeframes (See Exhibit 4.36.3–4)

  1. Every attempt should be made to respond to the inquiry in a timely manner. Telephone inquiries should be addressed within 3 working days. Formal written inquiries should be resolved within 30 days.

  2. If the response to either type of inquiry will take longer than 30 days, a short memorandum providing a status report should be submitted every 30 days to the JCT. The memorandum should contain the case name, tax years, earliest statute of limitations, status explanation/reason for delay, and expected completion date. See Exhibit 4.36.3-5 for a summary of all applicable timeframes.

4.36.4.6  (08-15-2004)
Disclosure of Correspondence with Joint Committee on Taxation

  1. Correspondence, informal or formal (including e-mail), from the JCT should not be released to the taxpayer without the permission of the JCT.

  2. When the JCT raises an issue on a case, the Service has two options;

    1. agree to adopt that position and present it to the taxpayer as the position of the Service; or

    2. reply to the Committee with the reasons for disagreement.

  3. Any documents created by the Service in connection with a response to any JCT correspondence should also not be released to the taxpayer without the permission of the JCT.

4.36.4.7  (08-15-2004)
Withdrawal of Report from Joint Committee Jurisdiction

  1. If adjustments are made or proposed by the examination group which will reduce the net refund or credit below the jurisdictional amount after a report has been submitted to the JCT and before they have released the case, the Joint Committee Specialist will prepare a memo requesting withdrawal of the case from consideration by the JCT.

  2. The memo should be prepared as soon as possible after an agreement, Form 870 or equivalent is obtained from the taxpayer. The memo should contain the taxpayer’s information and briefly discuss the adjustments, set forth the taxable income or loss and tax liability as finally determined and request the case be released from JCT jurisdiction. It will be forwarded to the Joint Committee Program Analyst who will submit it to JCT.

4.36.4.7.1  (08-15-2004)
Situations That Decrease The Reported Refund

  1. There are several situations that could cause the reported refund to be reduced below the jurisdictional amount, including, but not limited to:

    1. Reconsideration of an issue as a result of a JCT inquiry and the taxpayer is in agreement.

    2. Completion of the examination in the case of a Modified Expedite Report

4.36.4.8  (08-15-2004)
Taxpayer Notification Letters

  1. When the report has been forwarded to the Joint Committee Program Analyst for transmission to the JCT, the Joint Committee Specialist will prepare and mail Letter 1573 (P) to the taxpayer and authorized representative, if applicable. See Exhibit 4.36.4-2. An e-mail will be sent to notify the team manager of the case status.

  2. After the clearance letter is received from the JCT, the Joint Committee Specialist will prepare and mail Letter 1574 (P) to the taxpayer and the authorized representative, if applicable. See Exhibit 4.36.4-3. An e-mail will be sent to notify the team manager of the case status. The case file (including the administrative file copy of the Joint Committee report) will be processed and closed in accordance with established procedures.

4.36.4.9  (08-15-2004)
Special Situations

  1. The following case characteristics require special handling:

    1. Related cases should be retained only if they might be changed as the result of issues raised in the review of the Joint Committee case.

    2. After the report is submitted to the JCT, selected sample cases must be sent to Industry LQMS for review.

    3. Upon receipt of the JCT clearance letter, SBSE cases identified as part of the sample selection will be forwarded to CPS for closure. CPS will then send to EQMS for review.

4.36.4.10  (08-15-2004)
Closing Agreements

  1. Closing agreements, including those based on Competent Authority determinations, will be signed by or for the taxpayerbut not by the approving Service official. The closing agreement will be submitted as part of the Joint Committee report. After the case is released by the JCT, it will be returned to the examining group for final processing including signature of the closing agreement by the appropriate Service official.

  2. In those situations where an issue is resolved early in the examination, such as Fast Track Settlement or Early Referral to Appeals, the JCS will forward the closing agreement, any supporting documents and the cover memo prepared by the examiner to the JCT. The Joint Committee Specialist’s contact information will also be provided to the JCT. See IRM 4.36.3.6.2 and Exhibit 3.36.3-6. After it is reviewed, the JCT will return the agreement to the specialist who will return it to the examining group for signature by the appropriate Service official.

4.36.4.10.1  (08-15-2004)
Fast Track Settlements

  1. If a case that was part of the Fast Track Settlement Program is submitted for review with an unsigned closing agreement, the Appeals Closing Memorandum (ACM) must be included as part of the file.

4.36.4.11  (08-15-2004)
Suspense Cases

  1. In the event a Joint Committee case becomes a suspense case while it is in the review process, the case will be returned to the examining group for appropriate action.

4.36.4.12  (08-15-2004)
Bankruptcy Cases

  1. A Joint Committee report is required in bankruptcy or receivership cases that meet the jurisdictional amounts of IRC section 6405. Overpayments or deficiencies should be processed in accordance with the procedures outlined in IRM 4.27, Bankruptcy Handbook.

4.36.4.13  (08-15-2004)
Non-TEFRA Investor Procedures

  1. Joint Committee cases that contain non-TEFRA issues will be maintained in a local area suspense file. However, prior to placing the case in suspense, any agreed deficiencies relating to non-TEFRA issues will be assessed and the case will be forwarded to the appropriate Joint Committee Specialist group for review. Upon completion of the review, the case will be returned to the examining area (without the preparation of a Joint Committee report) and placed in the local area suspense file until the completion of the related key case examination.

  2. Upon completion of the examination of the key case and after the processing of any deficiencies, the completed case will be returned to the Joint Committee Specialist group for final processing and preparation of the Joint Committee report if it still meets the jurisdictional amount for a Joint Committee case.

4.36.4.14  (08-15-2004)
TEFRA Investor Procedure

  1. Joint Committee cases that contain TEFRA issues will be maintained in a local area suspense file. However, prior to placing the case in suspense, any agreed deficiencies relating to non-TEFRA issues will be assessed and the case will be forwarded to the appropriate Joint Committee Specialist group review. Upon completion of the review the case will be returned to the examining location (without the preparation of a Joint Committee report) and placed in the local area suspense file until notification is received from the service center that the TEFRA issues are resolved. Upon such notification, any deficiencies will be assessed.

  2. If the case still meets the jurisdictional requirements after completion of an examination of a flow-through entity, the examining area will forward the completed Joint Committee case to the Joint Committee Specialist group for final processing and preparation of the Joint Committee report,

4.36.4.15  (08-15-2004)
Processing IRC section 6405(a) Refunds-Expedite Refund Report

  1. To ensure that “expedite” refunds are processed timely, closing documents will be prepared and placed in a work file, also known as a " dummy" file. Once the dated copy of the report is received from the Joint Committee Program Analyst, the Joint Committee Specialist will notate on Form 3198, Special Handling Notice, or local equivalent, the tentative scheduled refund date (23C date), which is the 31st day from the date received by the JCT. The specialist will attach the form or its equivalent to the file. The file will then be forwarded to the CPS unit. CPS will then coordinate with the appropriate Campus to ensure the refund is processed timely.

  2. Generally inquiries received during the 30 day moratorium will not delay the processing of the refund. However, if the Joint Committee Specialist is notified in writing that the JCT requests that the refunds not be released, the JCS should immediately contact CPS to stop the processing of the refund.

4.36.4.16  (08-15-2004)
Refunds Eligible for Expedite Treatment

  1. The Service will only process a IRC section 6405(a) refund or credit with respect to any jurisdictional year prior to release by the JCT if the following conditions exist:

    1. The statute of limitations under IRC section 6501 must be open (the statute must be the original statute or as extended by an unrestricted Form 872) for each of the years covered. Accordingly, in carryback situations, the original statute must be open for the source year as well as the carryback year(s); and

    2. For Expedite Refund Requests, there must be a minimum of fifteen months remaining on the statute when the case is submitted to the Joint Committee Specialist Group. For Modified Expedite Refunds, there must be sufficient time to complete the examination and JCT review process. If sufficient time is not remaining, the JCT will not agree to the expedite procedures

4.36.4.16.1  (08-15-2004)
Refunds Not Eligible For Expedite Treatment

  1. Under no circumstance will the Service process a IRC section 6405(a) refund or credit with respect to any jurisdictional year prior to release by the JCT if any of the following conditions exist:

    1. any portion of the tax, if erroneously refunded, may only be recovered by civil action brought in the name of the United States under the provisions of IRC section 7405 for erroneous refunds; or

    2. the portion of a refund attributable to an unexamined or unsurveyed source year, to the extent such amount is not secured by bond under the procedures contained in IRM 4.36.3.7.3; or

    3. expiration of the statute of limitations for that jurisdictional year is imminent. Imminent usually means less than six months remaining on the period of limitations.

4.36.4.17  (08-15-2004)
Disclosure of Individual Information - Form 5482, Record of Disclosure

  1. Information provided to the JCT on potential adjustments to Individual Forms 1040 or any other personal, individual income tax return pursuant to IRC section 6405 is considered a disclosure.

  2. The Joint Committee Specialist should complete Form 5482, Record of Disclosure. The form is a two-part carbon form. The original is filed with the examination administrative file for the individual and the copy should be retained in the Joint Committee Specialist group for five years. Additional Forms 5482 need to be completed if new information concerning years or individuals not previously accounted for is disclosed to the JCT. See IRM 11.3.19, Privacy Act Accounting for Disclosures, for additional information on the form.

  3. Form 5482 should be completed at the time the Joint Committee report is forwarded to the Joint Committee Program Analyst.

  4. When completing the form, Item 3 should be 42.001 and Item 8 should be (b)(9).

Exhibit 4.36.4-1  (08-15-2004)
Letter 1573 A (P) (10-2003)

This image is too large to be displayed in the current screen. Please click the link to view the image.

Exhibit 4.36.4-2  (08-15-2004)
Letter 1573 (P) (10–2003)

This image is too large to be displayed in the current screen. Please click the link to view the image.
This image is too large to be displayed in the current screen. Please click the link to view the image.

Exhibit 4.36.4-3  (08-15-2004)
Letter 1574 (P.) (10–2003)

This image is too large to be displayed in the current screen. Please click the link to view the image.
This image is too large to be displayed in the current screen. Please click the link to view the image.

Exhibit 4.36.4-4  (08-15-2004)
Dispute Resolution Chart

    Dispute Resolution    
Types of Dispute First Level Second Level Third Level Comments
Proposed Change to RAR - JC Specialist Inquiry Team Manager & JC Specialist Manager Territory Manager & JC Progam Manager DFO/Compliance Area Director and Director, PQA If no agreement reached, the Director, PQA with concurrence from Chief, will make the decision.
Proposed Change to RAR-JCT Inquiry Team Manager & JC Specialists Manager Territory Manager & JC Program Manager DFO/Compliance Area Director and Director, PQA JCT Senior Refund Counsel and Chief Counsel If no agreement reached, the Director, PQA with concurrence from Chief Counsel, will make the decision.

More Internal Revenue Manual