UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Corrections
Institution Lompoc, Lompoc, California and Local 4048, Council of
Prison Locals C-33, American Federation of Government employees,
AFL-CIO, Case No. 99 FSIP 92, August 3, 1999 (Release No. 423).
The AGENCY proposed that--
[T]he Class A uniform remain the only authorized uniform to be
worn in the [Special Housing Unit] on all shifts for both positions,
but employees would not be required to wear a tie or a blazed.
For those limited instances where an employee's uniform might
become soiled, the Employer would "provide a jumpsuit for staff
to utilize when searching the cells, serving meals, or as an option
to protect the Class A uniform."
The UNION proposed that--
[T]he [Officer-in-Charge] would have the option of wearing the
grey uniform on the evening and morning shifts, but continue to
wear the dress uniform during the day shift. The Number Two officer
would continue to wear the dress uniform regardless of the shift.
The PANEL ordered the parties to adopt the AGENCY's proposal.
UNIFORMS
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional
complex Coleman, Coleman, Florida and Local 506, Council of Prison
Locals C-33, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO,
Case No. 99 FSIP 104, September 29, 1999 (Release No. 424).
Basically, the UNION proposed that "Compound and Special Housing
Unit (SHU) officers be allowed to wear the authorized nickel gray
uniforms 'at no cost to management.'"
The AGENCY proposed "to provide protective clothing to the [SHU]
officers when serving the meals and to the Compound officers when
filling the mowers with gasoline."
The PANEL ordered the parties to adopt the AGENCY's proposal.
|