edsitement/neh logospacer gif top spacer gif
SearchSitemapContact UsCalendarHome
Subject Catalogue
Art & CultureLiterature & Language ArtsForeign LanguageHistory & Social Studies
header bottom spacer gifAll Lesson PlansAll Subject CategoriesEDSITEment-reviewed websites
subject catalogue thinkfinity logo Natinal Endowment for the Humanities home page
Open Printable Lesson Plan
 



 
  James Madison.
Courtesy of American Memory at the Library of Congress.

 

Subject Areas
History and Social Studies
   U.S. History - Civics and U.S. Government
   U.S. History - Colonial America and the New Nation
 
Time Required
 Lesson One: Madison Was There: One class period.
Lesson Two: The Second National Bank: Powers Not Specified in the Constitution: One or two class periods.
Lesson Three: Raising an Army: Balancing the Power of the States and the Federal Government: One or two class periods.
Lesson Four: Internal Improvements Balancing Act: Federal/State, Executive/Legislative: One or two class periods.
 
Skills
 Comparing and contrasting
Interpreting archival documents
Making inferences and drawing conclusions
Working collaboratively
 
Curriculum Unit
James Madison: From Father of the Constitution to President
 
Additional Data
 Date Created: 04/02/04
 
Additional Student/Teacher Resources
 Blackline Master for Unit (PDF)
 
Date Posted
 4/2/2004
 
Feedback
  Send us your thoughts about this lesson!
 
Email this Lesson
  Send this lesson to friends or colleagues
 

James Madison: Raising an Army: Balancing the Power of the States and the Federal Government

Lesson Three of the Curriculum Unit: James Madison: From Father of the Constitution to President

Guiding Questions

  • What events during Madison's presidency raised constitutional questions?
  • What were the constitutional issues?
  • Where did Madison stand?

Learning Objectives

After completing this lesson, students will be able to:
  • Summarize at least one event during Madison's presidency that raised constitutional questions.
  • Explain the constitutional questions raised by the event.
  • Discuss Madison's opinions on the constitutional questions.

1. What Was the Problem?

Not everyone in the U.S. supported the War of 1812. In fact, according to the essay Madison's Presidency: Foreign Affairs on the EDSITEment-reviewed website The American President:
Not all Americans, however, had wrapped themselves in the flag of patriotism. New England states seldom met their quotas of militiamen, and many New England merchants and farmers traded freely with the enemy. After the British offensive included northern ports, some New England Federalists talked about seceding from the Union. In an attempt to block secessionist sentiment, moderate Federalists called a convention in Hartford, Connecticut, to propose a series of constitutional amendments protecting sectional rights. The convention leaders brought their proposals to Washington just as news broke of New Orleans and the Treaty of Ghent. To most of the nation, the participants of the Hartford Convention looked like traitors, or at least unpatriotic troublemakers. Their antiwar criticism and regional concerns helped to doom the weakened Federalist Party as a national entity on the political scene.
Can a state oppose the will of the federal government even regarding something as important as a war? (NOTE: If more background on the War of 1812 is desired, The James Madison Center, a link from the EDSITEment resource The American President, offers a review of events leading to the war, as well as information on the war itself in its U.S. History Curriculum: Chapter IV in the section "Understand the War of 1812." More detail on the military aspects of the war can be found in The War of 1812, also from The James Madison Center.)

2. What Does the Constitution Say?

Review with the class the relevant sections of the U.S. Constitution, available on the EDSITEment-reviewed website The Avalon Project. These would include: Through your review of these sections of the Constitution and follow-up class discussion, help students understand the issues involved in answering the following questions, many of which do not have pat answers:
  • Does the Constitution say anything specific that would relate to the raising of an army?
  • What is meant by the phrase "provide for the common defense," which is included in The Preamble?
  • How does the power to raise revenue (Article 1, Section 7, #1) relate to the power to raise an army?
  • Article 1, Section 8 gives Congress the power to declare war and raise an army. Does it explain how an army would be raised?
  • What was meant by a militia? (A military unit comparable to a modern-day reserve that was raised and trained by a state.)
  • What part are the states supposed to play?
  • In what way does Article 1, Section 10 (especially #3) limit the power of the states?
  • In what way did the Tenth Amendment assign power to the states?
  • Article 2, Section 2 states that the president is the commander-in-chief. Does it give the president the power to raise the army he will command?

3. A Brief Look at the Documentary Record

Share with the class the following documents, all available on the EDSITEment resource American Memory:
  • Read the brief declaration and the chart in Quotas of Militia from the Several States. How is the army being raised?
  • Share the following excerpts from the Refusal of Massachusetts to Furnish Its Quota, written by the governor, Caleb Strong:
    The people of this State appear to be under no apprehension of an invasion… [T]hey expressed no desire that any part of the militia should be called out for their defense, and, in some cases, we were assured such a measure would be disagreeable to them…

    You observe, in your last letter, that the danger of invasion… increases… It can hardly be supposed that, if this State had been in great danger of invasion, the troops would have been called from hence to carry on offensive operations in a distant Province…

    I though it expedient to call the Council together… I requested their advice… The Council advised, "that they are unable, from a view of the constitution of the United States… to perceive that any exigency [any urgency] exists, which can render it advisable to comply…

    The Governor and Council have authority to require the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court,… upon the following questions:

    1st Whether the commanders in chief of the militia of the several States have a right to determine whether any of the exigencies contemplated by the onstitution of the United States exist…
    2nd Whether…the militia…can be be lawfully commanded by any officer but of the militia, except by the President of the United States?

    (The council) advised me to call into service of the United States three companies of the detached militia… I have this day issued an order for calling out three companies of the detached militia… Two of the companies will be stationed at Eastport, and one company at Robinston, [both under the jurisdiction of Massachusetts] until the President shall otherwise direct.
    What objections on constitutional grounds did the governor raise? What practical objections did he raise? Did the governor have a strong constitutional argument? (NOTE: If desired, students can read the entire text of the Refusal of Massachusetts to Furnish Its Quota.)
  • In the Refusal of Connecticut to Furnish Its Quota, Page 1, the governor of Connecticut asserted that, "The Constitution of the United States has ordained that Congress may provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions." He refused to furnish his state's quota because he claimed none of the specified conditions existed. He also objected to the statement that Connecticut's men would be placed "under the immediate command of an officer or officers of the army of the United States." Did the governor have a valid constitutional argument? (NOTE: If desired, students can read the entire text of the Refusal of Connecticut to Furnish Its Quota, Page 1, which continues with the Refusal of Connecticut to Furnish Its Quota, Page 2.)

4. What Did Madison Say?

There was universal agreement that the ability to raise an army is essential to the nation, but there were two questions that needed to be answered. Whatever system might be in place for raising an army, what rights of refusal should individual states have? What is the best system to guarantee an army can be raised when one is needed?

Keep in mind the American distaste for standing armies. In the Declaration of Independence, available on the EDSITEment-reviewed website The Avalon Project, Thomas Jefferson complained that the British king "kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures." "Legislatures" in this case refers to the various colonial legislatures.

Download, copy and distribute the worksheet "Madison on Rights of the States vs. Rights of the Federal Government," (see Preparing to Teach This Curriculum Unit for download instructions), which includes excerpts reflecting Madison's general thinking on this issue, as well as on the specific issue of raising an army. The goal of the class is to create a statement the students consider to be a cohesive summary of Madison's opinion. (NOTE: Help your students as they work as a group to formulate a correct, clearly worded generalization. This is a good opportunity for them to discover or rediscover the importance of choosing just the right words to express their ideas.) Did Madison's position seem to indicate that he would agree with the actions of the governors of Massachusetts and Connecticut in refusing to fill their quotas? With regard to the impending War of 1812, if a larger army was necessary, why did President Madison have to ask Congress? See the Assessment, below, for a follow-up to this discussion.

5. A Brief Postscript: What Happened?

Though an in-depth discussion of the War of 1812 is beyond the scope of this lesson, culminate student learning with a brief look at the consequences of the conflict over state militia quotas for the War of 1812. EDSITEment offers a complementary lesson, The War of 1812, Causes and Objections: Primary Sources.

Share the following excerpts from The United States Army, a link from the EDSITEment resource Internet Public Library, which offers an analysis of the raising of an army for The War of 1812 and the aftermath of the resulting controversy:

Congress did not lack the will to prepare for war…

In addition to increasing the Regular Army, Congress had authorized the President to accept volunteer forces and to call upon the states for militia. The difficulty was not planning for an army, but raising one…

A significant weakness in the American position was the disunity of the country. In the New England states public opinion ranged from mere apathy to actively expressed opposition to the war. A good many Massachusetts and Connecticut ship owners fitted out privateers-privately owned and armed vessels that were commissioned to take enemy ships-but New England contributed little else to the prosecution of the war, and continued to sell grain and provisions to the British…

The militia, occasionally competent, was never dependable, and in the nationalistic period that followed the war when the exploits of the Regulars were justly celebrated, an ardent young Secretary of War, John Calhoun, would be able to convince Congress and the nation that the first line of defense should be a standing army…
No "penalty" was ever suffered by the uncooperative New England states, though the Federalist Party—with its strongest base of support in New England and whose members opposing the War of 1812 supported the refusal to fill the quotas-never recovered from the accusations of a lack of patriotism arising during the wave of national sentiment that followed the war.

Assessment

Students having completed the lesson should be able to respond effectively to the following:
  • Why were the Founders so concerned about keeping a standing army?
  • What does the Constitution say about how an army should be raised?
  • Is a standing army prohibited by the Constitution?
  • In what ways did the federal government have problems getting states to furnish their quotas of troops?
  • What constitutional issues did the governors of the refusing states raise?
  • Were these concerns valid?
  • What was Madison's position on a standing army? On the rights of states to refuse to comply with an action of the central government?
  • (NOTE: Additional discussion questions may be found in the text for the lesson.)
Do Madison's various statements on raising an army and the balance of power work together to create a cohesive philosophy? Did Madison's opinions change given the situation? Or, did Madison's opinions evolve? Ask students to compose a brief essay in response to the question: How do you explain Madison's decision to authorize a standing army? Students should cite specific documents or events as support.

Return to curriculum unit overview

Previous lesson

Next lesson

Selected EDSITEment Websites



Standards Alignment

View your state’s standards