Food basket, mouse

ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS IN FOOD CONTAMINATION



The symposium will be held at the American Chemical Society National Meeting in Las Vegas, NV on Thursday, September 11, 1997, and will be part of the Agricultural and Food Chemistry Division program.

The topics to be covered include analytical or contamination aspects of insect and animal filth, decompostion, and foreign objects. The speakers will participate in a short panel discussion after each session. Below is listed the titles of the different talks and the abstracts. For more information on the symposium please contact:

George C. Ziobro, PhD
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
200 C. St S.W. HFS-315
Washington, DC 20204
phone: 202.205.4994
fax: 202.205.4091
e-mail GZiobro@cfsan.fda.gov


Symposium Talks


ABSTRACTS


METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF FILTH, DECOMPOSITION, AND FOREIGN OBJECTS IN FOODS
John S. Gecan, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC 20204

What is filth? What is it's source? How does one analyze for it? What is the influence of the matrix on the on the recovery of filth? An overview of the methods for the detection of filth, decomposition, and foreign objects in foods will be described and discussed. Specific methods for each type of contaminant will be described and the mechanism of detection or recovery discussed in detail. Current literature sources of these methods will also be discussed.




MODIFYING AND DEVELOPING METHODS FOR FILTH, DECOMPOSITION, AND FOREIGN OBJECTS
John S. Gecan, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC 20204

Analytical methods for filth, decomposition, and foreign objects in foods are generally designed for a specific product and typically perform as intended only on that product. Methods can sometimes be revised and adapted to new products if the analyst considers the basic operating mechanism of the methods with respect to the product composition and analytes intended for recovery. Approaches for the revision of existing methods and the development of new methods for the recovery of filth, decomposition, and foreign objects from a variety of food matrices will be discussed.




INVISIBLE FILTH A: ROACHES and THEIR ALLIES
Thomas H. Sidebottom, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Alameda, CA 95402

Evidence of food adulteration by cockroaches and their allies is often invisible. Regulatory analysts frequently have to put on their detective's hat to find and identify the microscopic clues (feces and body fragments) left behind by the perpetrator(s). This grouping includes insects known for their ability to transmit diseases and to be prolific and gregarious invaders of buildings where food is processed and stored. A description of the diagnostic insect fragments and excreta pellets commonly encountered during filth analyses of food products will be presented.




INVISIBLE FILTH B: DISEASE-CARRYING FLIES
Alan R. Olsen, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Alameda, CA 94502

Twelve species of flies (Diptera) are documented in the scientific literature as repeatedly associated with the food-borne pathogens E.coli, Salmonella, and Shigella. The "dirty dozen" species are all synanthropic and belong to one of three families: Calliphoridae (blow files), Muscidae (house flies) or Sarcophagidae (flesh flies). A method for differentiating these flies by the characteristic venation of the wings is presented, along with brief descriptions of fly behaviors that may put food products at risk of microbial contamination.




MAMMALIAN, AVIAN, AND INSECT METABOLIC WASTE IDENTIFICATION
Patricia Valdes Biles and George C. Ziobro, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC 20202

Mammalian, avian, or insect contamination of a food, drug, cosmetic, or medical device can sometimes be determined by analysis of the suspect product for the presence of metabolic waste products, either fecal or urinary. These waste metabolites have unique chemical signatures. The presence of these chemicals from metabolic waste materials in a sample confirms contamination. A review of the different chemical indicators will be presented as well as the current methodology used for the detection of these compounds.




CHEMICAL METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF DECOMPOSITION IN FISHERY PRODUCTS
W.F. Staruszkiewicz, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. 20204

Decomposition occurs rapidly in fishery products when effective handling procedures are not followed. Millions of pounds of fishery products are affected annually and many of the decomposed products are associated with numerous reports of illnesses by consumers. A wide variety of chemicals are produced during spoilage which depend upon the microbial contamination and the conditions of abuse, and which are further affected by processing, chemical treatments and storage. Classes of compounds studied have included the biogenic amines (histamine, cadaverine, indole), low molecular weight amines (trimethylamine), organic acids and breakdown products of adenosine triphosphate. Practical applications of selected indicator compounds, the structure of analytical methods, and the development of field testing procedures will be discussed. Correlations between sensory evaluations, the levels of indicator compounds and the conditions of spoilage for several major fishery products will be given.




DIRECT MICROSCOPIC MOLD COUNTS AND HYPHAE RECOGNITION
Stanley M. Cichowicz, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC. 20204

Mold is the primary agent of decomposition in fruit and vegetable products. Mold hyphae which survive processing and remain recognizable after long periods of time are good indicators of rot. The presence and enumeration of mold hyphae in the Howard mold count method, still going strong after first being introduced in 1906, is considered a rapid and reliable quality indicator of the raw fruit and vegetable stock going into processed products. Geotrichum candidum, frequently called "machinery mold" grows on the moist product contact surfaces of inadequately cleaned fruit and vegetable processing plant equipment. The uniquely branched mycelial fragments slough off and contaminate finished products. Both Howard and Geotrichum methods use low magnification compound microscopes and short, fifteen minute sample preparation times. Proficient analysts can be trained in two to four days.




USE OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING IN FILTH ANALYSIS
George C. Ziobro and Stanley M. Cichowicz, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC. 20204

The dramatic decrease in the cost of computers combined with their increased abilities have opened the way for their use in filth analysis. Using inexpensive scanners it is possible to record the results of TLC plates and gels as well as "photocopy" labeling. Television or digital cameras can be interfaced to a microscope to record the results of an analysis. Using a variety of examples, this talk will discuss the setup and use electronic imaging in filth analysis.




AN IMMUNOASSAY FOR DETECTING INSECT CONTAMINATION OF GRAIN: COMPARISON TRIALS WITH OTHER PROCEDURES
G.B. Kitto Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712; B. Brader, Biotect Inc., Austin, Texas 78758; R. Plarre and W. Burkholder, USDA/ARS, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; B. Richardson and K. Emke, General Mills, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427

In collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a number of major milling companies, the "Insect-Detect" immunoassay for analyzing grain for insect contamination has been compared with several more traditional methods, including X-ray, crack and float and insect fragment counts. Testing was carried out in blind fashion using clean wheat samples that were spiked with differing numbers of grain kernels infested with 4th instar larvae of the granary weevil. The collaborative trials showed that the insect immunoassay clearly provided the most accurate measure of actual insect infestation, followed by X-ray analysis. While both crack and float and fragment count procedures provided a general measure of contamination, they showed much greater variability.




MACROANALYTICAL PROCEDURES MANUAL - SECOND EDITION
Alan R. Olsen, and Sherry A. Knight, eds, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Alameda, CA 94502

This talk reports progress on the revision of the Macroanalytical Procedures Manual, a compendium of methods for detecting filth and extraneous materials in food products. In addition to a new format, the manual will include a new method for examining rodent filth, a method for differentiating toxic mushrooms by morphology and a description of parasites found in seafood. Other changes include harmonization with USDA methodologies and other minor modifications of the manual.




WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE: THE FUTURE OF FILTH RESEARCH
George C. Ziobro, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC. 20204

Filth analysis faces additional challenges as we approach the 21st century. Among these challenges are: replacement of current methods dependent on hazardous solvents, replacement of methods which are very time and/or analyst intensive; development of methods for new products, increased regulatory concerns, international standardization of methods and procedures, and detection of genetically engineered proteins as possible adulterants. As chemists, where do we go from here?


7 June 1997


Home
Hypertext updated by gcz/dms 2000-JAN-16