Reportability Concepts

Reportability edits are used to flag data items that should have been reported but were not. For example, all banks are expected to provide a value (positive number, negative number or zero) for the provision for loan and lease losses and failure to provide a value for this data item will cause an edit flag. The CDR will require banks to provide data for all data items flagged by reportability edits before it will accept the Call Report data. These edits use the Reportability Concept values in the table below to determine all the Call Reports data items each bank is required to complete.

Values for these concepts will be calculated at each quarter-end from the Federal Reserve Board structure database and from previously reported Call Report information. Beginning in June 2006, this information will be available to vendors and bank’s via CDR Web Services. Please review this information for accuracy as incorrect information may affect the ability of the CDR to accept your bank’s Call Report data. Please contact your analyst with any questions about these data items or their values.

Concept Name	Description	Value
RCONA901	DURING THE CALENDAR QUARTER, DID THE INSTITUTION ACQUIRE ASSETS OR LIABILITIES THROUGH A BUSINESS COMBINATION OR BRANCH ACQUISITION, OR DID THE INSTITUTION COMMENCE BUSINESS AS A NEW INSTITUTION?
RCONC587	AT ANY TIME DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR, DID THE INSTITUTION HAVE AN INTERNATIONAL BANKING FACILITY (IBF) ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF FEDERAL REGULATION D?
RCONC588	AT ANY TIME DURING CALENDAR YEAR, DID THE INSTITUTION HAVE AN EDGE OR AGREEMENT CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER SECTION 25 OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT AND SUBJECT TO FEDERAL REGULATION K?
RCONC589	WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF EDGE OR AGREEMENT CORPORATIONS OWNED BY THE INSTITUTION AS OF THE REPORT DATE?
RCONC590	DID INSTITUTION HAVE AN ACTIVE FOREIGN OFFICE DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR?
RCONC591	WHAT IS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BRANCHES OR CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES (OTHER THAN "SHELL" BRANCHES) OWNED BY THE INSTITUTION IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES, PUERTO RICO, OR U.S. TERRITORIES OR POSSESSIONS AS OF THE REPORT DATE?
RCONC592	DID THE INSTITUTION EVER SHIFT ITS REPORTING STATUS BECAUSE THE ASSETS EXCEEDED $300 MILLION AS OF JUNE 30, OF ANY PREVIOUS YEAR; OR DID THE INSTITUTION EVER SHIFT ITS REPORTING STATUS AS A RESULT OF A BUSINESS COMBINATION OR BRANCH ACQUISITION THAT CAUSED TOTAL ASSETS TO EXCEED $300 MILLION?
RCONC593	DID THE INSTITUTION EVER SHIFT ITS REPORTING STATUS BECAUSE THE ASSETS EXCEEDED $100 MILLION AS OF JUNE 30, OF ANY PREVIOUS YEAR; OR DID THE INSTITUTION EVER SHIFT ITS REPORTING STATUS AS OF A RESULT OF A BUSINESS COMBINATION OR BRANCH ACQUISITION THAT CAUSED TOTAL ASSETS TO EXCEED $100 MILLION?
RCONC594	DID INSTITUTION HAVE AN ACTIVE FOREIGN BRANCH DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR?
RCONC595	WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF FOREIGN BRANCHES (OTHER THAN "SHELL" BRANCHES) OWNED BY THE INSTITUTION AS OF THE REPORT DATE?
RCONC596	DID INSTITUTION HAVE AN ACTIVE FOREIGN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR?
RCONC597	WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF FOREIGN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES OWNED BY THE INSTITUTION?
RCONC695	IS THE INSTITUTION CONSIDERED TO BE A CREDIT CARD SPECIALTY BANK SOLEY FROM ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH AFFILIATED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS WHICH, ON A COMBINED BASIS REPORT OUTSTANDING CREDIT CARD RECEIVABLES THAT EXCEED, IN THE AGGREGATE, $500 MILLION AS OF REPORT DATE?
RCONC885	DID THE INSTITUTION HAVE TOTAL ASSETS EXCEEDING $1 BILLION AS OF JUNE 30, OF THE PRECEEDING YEAR? OR, DUE TO A START-UP, ACQUISITION, OR BUSINESS COMBINATION, DID THE INSTITUTION HAVE TOTAL ASSETS EXCEEDING $1 BILLION AS OF CURRENT QUARTER-END? (ONCE A BANK SURPASSES THE REPORTING THRESHOLD AND BEGINS TO REPORT THE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED INFORMATION, IT MUST CONTINUE TO REPORT THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS WITHOUT REGARD TO WHETHER IT LATER FALLS BELOW THE TOTAL ASSET THRESHOLD)

This list can be found in the Guidelines for Resolving Edits.