Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 12, No. 7
July 2006

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

Comments Comments



Methods
Appendix 1 References
Appendix 1 Figure
Appendix 2
Back to article

Dispatch

Smallpox during Pregnancy and Maternal Outcomes

Hiroshi Nishiura*†Comments
*University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; and †Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan


Appendix 1

Methods

Search Strategy

Appendix 1 Figure
Appendix 1 Figure.

Click to view enlarged image

Figure. Flow diagram of the study selection process.

Since most documented large-scale outbreaks of smallpox were written before the mid-20th century, this study could not follow formal methods of systematic review, i.e., by using MEDLINE or other databases. Consequently, this study first tracked selected references in major specialized books (1–4) and articles on smallpox or viral diseases after the mid-20th century (5–8). These references (9–12) were subsequently reviewed, and their references were further tracked, regardless of language, to search for potentially useful articles. This task was repeated as many times as necessary until no further references were identified (Appendix 1 Figure). Consequently, references dating back to the 19th century were reviewed.

Study Selection Criteria

All publications reporting either of the defined maternal outcomes, i.e., case fatality and miscarriage or premature birth, were selected. Second, the obtained publications were limited by the following inclusion criteria: the publication must 1) document >8 smallpox cases during pregnancy (exclusion of case reports), 2) clarify the time and place of the outbreak, 3) report an outbreak of variola major (not variola minor), and 4) explicitly define and describe either of the outcomes as a major topic of discussion.

Statistical Analysis

Since crude case fatalities and frequencies of miscarriage and premature birth could be biased by several serious underlying factors, e.g., vaccination and progress in obstetrics and medicine as a whole, the heterogeneity of which cannot be methodologically adjusted, interpreting findings after combining the data after statistical adjustment was deemed inappropriate in this study. Thus, data analysis did not follow usual methods of metaanalysis for estimation of combined case fatality and the proportion of miscarriage and premature birth. Rather, the outcomes, except overall crude estimates, were investigated by each publication separately when possible. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate univariate associations. Confidence intervals (CI) for a proportion, p, were obtained by using the standard error, mathematical figure, where N is the sample size.

Identification of Historical Records

First, 13 studies were excluded: 8 were clinical case reports (13–20), 1 did not clarify the time and place of the outbreak and showed the same number of cases and deaths documented in another study included for analysis (21), 2 documented variola minor outbreaks (6,9), and the remaining 2 were review articles that did not provide outcomes (22,23). Further, a more recent study by Dixon in Tripolitania was also excluded because only approximate case fatalities (40% and 11% for pregnant and nonpregnant patients, respectively) were given (24). Four patients in the New South Wales report (25) were excluded from the analyses because disease onset was observed after delivery. Consequently, as noted in the main text, 19 outbreaks were identified. Half originated from a review article published in 1932 (10). The original reports were written in Dutch, English, French, German, and Italian.

Appendix 1 References

  1. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Ježek Z, Ladnyi ID. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1988 [cited 2006 May 3]. Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/smallpox/9241561106.pdf
  2. Dixon CW. Smallpox. London: Churchill; 1962.
  3. Rao AR. Smallpox. Bombay: Kothari Book Dept; 1972.
  4. Hanshaw JB, Dudgeon JA. Viral diseases of the fetus and newborn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1978.
  5. Rao AR, Prahlad I, Swaminathan M, Lakshmi A. Pregnancy and smallpox. J Indian Med Assoc. 1963;40:353–63.
  6. Megale P, Angulo JJ, Pederneiras CA. Variola minor in Braganca Paulista county, 1956. Observations on the clinical course of variola minor and on pregnancy in women with the disease. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1979;72:11–20.
  7. Marsden JP. Variola minor; a personal analysis of 13,686 cases. Bull Hyg (Lond). 1948;23:735–46.
  8. Saxen L, Cantell K, Hakama M. Relation between smallpox vaccination and outcome of pregnancy. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1968;58:1910–21.
  9. Marsden JP, Greenfield CRM. Inherited smallpox. Arch Dis Child. 1934;9:309–14.
  10. Lynch FW. Dermatologic conditions of the fetus with particular reference to variola and vaccinia. Arch Derm Syphilol. 1932;26:997–1019.
  11. Bancroft IR. Clinical observations on variola. Journal of Medical Research. 1904;11:322–44.
  12. Voigt L. Über den Einfluss der Pockenkrankheit auf Menstruation, Schwangerschaft, Geburt und Fötus. Sammlung Klinischer Vortraege/Gynaekologie. 1894–1897;112:249–72.
  13. Lop PA. Variole et vaccine dans la grossesse [thesis]. Paris: Université de Paris; 1893.
  14. Jenner E. Two cases of Small-pox infection communicated to the foetus in utero under particular circumstances, with additional remarks. Medico-Chirurgical Transactions. 1809;1:269–75.
  15. Davidson W. Small-pox in utero. Lancet. 1837–1838;2:628.
  16. Marsden JP, Chir B. Metastatic calcification. Notes on twins born shortly after an attack of smallpox in the mother. Br J Child Dis. 1930;27:193–200.
  17. Rigden G. Influence of maternal small-pox on the fetus. BMJ. 1877;1:229–30.
  18. Robinson H. Occurrence of confluent small-pox at the seventh month of pregnancy. BMJ. 1877;1:163.
  19. Cowie JM, Forbes D. Intrauterine influence of the fetus in small-pox. BMJ. 1904;1:1485.
  20. Paranjothy D, Samuel I. Pregnancy associated with haemorrhagic smallpox. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1960;67:309–13.
  21. Pfeiffer L. Behandlung und Prophylaxe der Blattern. Handbuch der speciellen Therapie. Jena (Germany): Fischer; 1894.
  22. von Jarrier. De la menstruation dans la variole [thesis]. Paris: Université de Paris; 1880.
  23. von Obermeier. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Pocken. Virchows Arch. 1872;IV:S345.
  24. Dixon CW. Smallpox in Tripolitania, 1946: an epidemiological and clinical study of 500 cases, including trials of penicillin treatment. J Hyg (Lond). 1948;46:351–77.
  25. Robertson DG. Small-pox epidemic in New South Wales, 1913. Melbourne, Australia: Minister for Trade and Customs; 1914.
   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Hiroshi Nishiura, Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, Westbahnhofstrasse 55, Tübingen, D-72070, Germany; email: nishiura.hiroshi@uni-tuebingen.de

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted May 25, 2006
This page last reviewed May 25, 2006

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention