Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 12, No. 7
July 2006

Adobe Acrobat logo

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

PDF Version PDF Version | Comments Comments | Email this article Email this article



The Study
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
Figure
Table 1
Table 2
Appendix 1
Appendix 2

Dispatch

Smallpox during Pregnancy and Maternal Outcomes

Hiroshi Nishiura*†Comments
*University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; and †Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

Suggested citation for this article


A historical study evaluated maternal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by smallpox. The overall case fatality was estimated to be 34.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.4–37.1), and the proportion of miscarriage or premature birth was estimated to be 39.9% (95% CI 36.5–43.2). Vaccination before pregnancy reduced the risk for death.

Pregnant women are at special risk for complications of smallpox vaccination (1); therefore, vaccination is not recommended for pregnant women in the absence of a reemergence of smallpox (2). Smallpox in pregnancy is believed to be more severe than in nonpregnant women or adult men (3), but this consensus is based on a limited number of studies conducted during the mid-20th century (4–6). This article examines the outcomes of pregnancy complicated by smallpox in historical records from the 19th and 20th centuries.

The Study

Since most large outbreaks were documented before the mid-20th century, I collected and reviewed the literature dating back to the 19th century. Technical details of the literature review are provided in online Appendix 1. All selected publications were retrospective studies based on epidemiologic observations of outbreaks that reported case fatalities, miscarriages, or premature births. Because vaccination or advances in obstetrics over time could bias these outcomes, these factors were abstracted from each publication and considered separately, when possible. Outcomes were then stratified by gestation period at onset of smallpox (by trimester), clinical classification of smallpox, and vaccination history. Case fatalities were compared between pregnant and nonpregnant patients. Except in Rao's work in Madras (4), miscarriage and premature birth were not separated, so they are described together.

Figure
Figure.

Click to view enlarged image

Figure. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by smallpox from data from 19th- and early 20th-century outbreaks...

Nineteen outbreaks were identified from historical records (4,7–20), and of these, 16 allowed estimates to be made of case fatality, and 15 allowed estimates of the proportion of miscarriage or premature birth. Of 1,074 pregnant patients, 368 died; and of 830 pregnant patients, 331 miscarried or gave birth prematurely (Figure). Since these articles are from many years ago, the proportion of cases that were undetected or unreported cannot be determined nor can the length of time since vaccination in persons who were vaccinated. Descriptions of excluded literature are given in online Appendix 1; individual case records were provided in 3 outbreaks and are included in online Appendix 2.

Figure, panel A, shows the distribution of estimated case fatalities for each outbreak with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Case fatalities varied widely among outbreaks. The earliest outbreak in 1830 (before compulsory vaccination) yielded the highest estimate (81.5%), while the 1913 outbreak in Australia had the lowest (4.3%). The overall crude case fatality was estimated to be 34.3% (95% CI 31.4–37.1). Case fatality, stratified by gestational age at onset of smallpox, is presented in Table 1; only 4 studies enabled stratification by gestational age. Case fatality was highest during the third trimester, except in Queirel's study, which included few cases (18). Case fatality, stratified by the clinical classification of smallpox, is shown in online Appendix 2. All patients with hemorrhagic cases died, but all patients without a rash (variola sine eruptione, VSE) survived.

Case fatalities among pregnant and nonpregnant patients are compared in Appendix 2. Case fatality was not significantly higher in pregnant patients in the Rotterdam outbreak (p = 0.33), where many VSE cases apparently occurred. The risks for a fatal outcome among pregnant patients in Berlin and Madras were 2.5× and 4.2× higher than among nonpregnant patients (p<0.01 for each). I also compared vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant patients, showing that the risk for death was significantly higher among unvaccinated women in these 3 outbreaks (7/7 vs. 7/39, p<0.01; 2/2 vs. 10/78, p = 0.02; and 9/12 vs. 17/82, p<0.01, respectively).

Crude proportions of miscarriage and premature birth, with 95% CI, are given in the Figure, panel B. The overall crude proportion of miscarriage or premature birth is estimated to be 39.9% (95% CI 36.5–43.2). Five outbreaks allowed stratification by gestational age at onset of smallpox (Table 2). The overall proportion of premature birth was highest during the last trimester of pregnancy, but no clear pattern was seen with regard to the frequency of miscarriage or premature birth. The proportion of miscarriage and premature birth, stratified by severity of smallpox, is shown in online Appendix 2. All hemorrhagic cases resulted in either miscarriage or premature birth before the mother's death. Even mild cases, those classified as discrete or VSE, tended to result in miscarriage or premature birth. Only the 1878 outbreak in Philadelphia (10) allowed a comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant patients. Twenty-two of 39 vaccinated and 5 of 7 unvaccinated patients miscarried or delivered prematurely (p = 0.68).

These outcomes could only be compared by history of miscarriage in the 1913 outbreak in Australia (19). Two of 3 patients with no history and 6 of 20 with a history of miscarriage had a miscarriage or premature birth, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.27, odds ratio 4.7, 95% CI 0.4–61.8). Comparison by previous experience of normal delivery (primipara or multipara) could only be performed with the data from Rotterdam from 1893 and 1894 (15). Ten of 21 primipara patients and 18 of 53 multipara patients had a miscarriage or premature birth (p = 0.30), which suggests that delivery history did not greatly affect the outcome of pregnancy complicated by smallpox.

Conclusions

Since outbreaks have been limited since the mid-20th century by the successful smallpox eradication program, historical records are a useful tool to document common patterns of maternal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by smallpox. Such analysis may be limited by unknown numbers of missed or unreported cases or imperfect vaccination histories. My estimates of the overall crude case fatality and proportion of miscarriage or premature birth were high. This study and Rao's (4) improve our understanding of smallpox in pregnancy, highlighting 3 points. First, case fatality is highest during the last trimester of gestation, but miscarriage and premature birth do not vary by trimester. Physiologic changes in the third trimester could partly explain the higher case fatality (21). Second, even mild cases were at high risk of causing miscarriage or premature birth. Third, miscarriage and premature birth were not significantly associated with vaccination history or previous miscarriage or delivery. That is, vaccination may not prevent miscarriage and premature birth.

Although prior vaccination offers less protection to pregnant women than others (22), this study shows that vaccination might offer at least partial protection. Case fatality in the event of a bioterrorist attack could be lowered with vaccination before pregnancy and should be considered if the risk for such an attack is high.

Acknowledgments

I thank the anonymous reviewers for greatly improving the manuscript; Hiroshi Sameshima for his comments from an obstetric point of view; and Klaus Dietz, Birgit Kaiser, Martin Eichner, and Chris Leary for their discussion and support in data collection.

This work was partly supported by Banyu Life Science Foundation International.

Dr Nishiura is a researcher at the Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, Germany. His primary research interest is mathematical and statistical epidemiology of infectious diseases.

References

  1. Henderson DA, Inglesby TV, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Jahrling PB, et al. Smallpox as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA. 1999;281:2127–37.
  2. Suarez VR, Hankins GD. Smallpox and pregnancy: from eradicated disease to bioterrorist threat. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:87–93.
  3. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Ježek Z, Ladnyi ID. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1988 [cited 2006 May 4]. Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/smallpox/9241561106.pdf
  4. Rao AR, Prahlad I, Swaminathan M, Lakshmi A. Pregnancy and smallpox. J Indian Med Assoc. 1963;40:353–63.
  5. Rao AR. Haemorrhagic smallpox: a study of 240 cases. J Indian Med Assoc. 1964;43:224–9.
  6. Dixon CW. Smallpox in Tripolitania, 1946: an epidemiological and clinical study of 500 cases, including trials of penicillin treatment. J Hyg (Lond). 1948;46:351–77.
  7. Voigt L. Über den Einfluss der Pockenkrankheit auf Menstruation, Schwangerschaft, Geburt und Fötus. Sammlung Klinischer Vortraege/Gynaekologie. 1894–1897;112:249–72
  8. Scheby-Buch. Bericht über das Material des Hamburger Pockenhauses vom August 1871 bis Februar 1872. Arch Derm Syphi. 1872–1873;4:506–32.
  9. Meyer L. Über Pocken beim weiblichen Geschlecht. Beiträge zur Geburtshülfe und Gynäkologie / hrsg. von d. Gesellschaft für Geburtshülfe in Berlin (Berlin: Crede). 1873;2:186–98.
  10. Welch WM. Smallpox in the pregnant woman and in the foetus. Philadelphia Medical Times. 1877–1878;8:390–8.
  11. Jobard. Influence de la variole sur la grossesse [thesis]. Paris: Université de Paris; 1880.
  12. Barthélemy. Recherches sur l'influence de lavariole sur la grossesse [thesis]. Paris: Université de Paris; 1880.
  13. Sangregorio G. Vaiuolo e gravidanza. Cenni statistici (1). Guardia Ostetrica di Milano. I Morgagni. 1887;29:793–6.
  14. Richardière. La variole pendant la grossesse. Arch de Tocol et de Gynecol. 1893;20:611–5.
  15. van der Willigen AM. Pokken in de Zwangerschap, 80 gevallen van variolae gravidarum. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1895;11:485–99.
  16. Charpentier JB. Variole et vaccine dans la grossesse [thesis]. Paris: Université de Paris; 1900.
  17. Viany C. Vaccine et variole au cours de la grossesse [thesis]. Lyon Med. 1900;93:397–401.
  18. Queirel. Variole et grossesse. Annales de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique. 1907;4:137–47.
  19. Robertson DG. Small-pox epidemic in New South Wales, 1913. Melbourne, Australia: Minister for Trade and Customs; 1914.
  20. Couréménos M. Influence de la variole sur la grossesse et le produit de la conception [thesis]. Paris: Université de Paris; 1901.
  21. Crapo RO. Normal cardiopulmonary physiology during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;39:3–16.
  22. Hassett DE. Smallpox infections during pregnancy, lessons on pathogenesis from nonpregnant animal models of infection. J Reprod Immunol. 2003;60:13–24.

 

Table 1. Case fatality among pregnant women with smallpox by gestational age, according to data from 19th- and early 20th-century outbreaks*


Reference

Gestational age <3 mo

Gestational age 4–6 mo

Gestational age 7–9 mo




D/C

CF (95% CI)

D/C

CF (95% CI)

D/C

CF (95% CI)


Meyer (9), 1868–1872

3/33

9.0 (0.0–18.9)

11/33

33.3 (17.2–49.4)

8/10

80.0 (55.2–100.0)

Welch (10), 1878

4/12

33.3 (6.7–60.0)

4/22

18.2 (2.1–34.3)

6/12

50.0 (21.7–78.3)

Queirel (18), 1906

2/4

50.0 (1.0–99.0)

7/10

14.5 (41.6–98.4)

1/5

17.9 (0.0–55.1)

Rao (5), 1959–1962

7/21

33.3 (13.2–53.5)

16/65

24.6 (14.1–35.1)

34/94

36.2 (26.5–45.9)

Total

16/70

22.9 (2.3–43.4)

38/130

29.2 (14.8–43.7)

49/121

40.5 (26.8–54.2)


*D/C, smallpox deaths/cases; CF, case fatality; CI, confidence interval.

 

Table 2. Miscarriage or premature birth among pregnant women with smallpox by gestational age, according to data from 19th- and early 20th-century outbreaks*


Reference

Gestational age <3 mo

Gestational age 4–6 mo

Gestational age 7–9 mo




L/C

PL (95% CI)

L/C

PL (95% CI)

L/C

PL (95% CI)


Meyer (9), 1868–1872

7/33

21.2 (7.3–35.1)

16/33

48.5 (31.5–65.4)

8/10

80.0 (55.3–100.0)

Welch (10), 1878

8/12

66.7 (40.1–93.2)

9/22

40.9 (20.5–61.3)

10/12

83.3 (62.4–100.0)

Queirel (18), 1906

3/4

75.0 (32.8–100.0)

8/10

80.0 (55.3–100.0)

0/5

0 (NC)

Robertson (19), 1913

1/2

50.0 (0.0–100.0)

6/9

66.7 (36.0–97.3)

1/12

8.3 (0.0–23.9)

Rao (5), 1959–1962

10/21

47.6 (26.4–68.9)

16/65

24.6 (14.2–35.0)

41/94

43.6 (33.6–53.6)

Total

29/72

40.3 (29.0–51.5)

55/139

39.6 (31.5–47.7)

60/133

45.1 (36.7–53.5)


*L/C, miscarriage or premature birth/cases; PL, proportion of miscarriage and premature birth; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculable.

 

Suggested citation for this article:
Nishiura H. Smallpox during pregnancy and maternal outcomes. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 Jul [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no07/05-1531.htm

   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Hiroshi Nishiura, Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, Westbahnhofstrasse 55, Tübingen, D-72070, Germany; email: nishiura.hiroshi@uni-tuebingen.de

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

Email this article

Please note: To prevent email errors, please use no web addresses, email addresses, HTML code, or the characters <, >, and @ in the body of your message.

Your email:

Your friend's email:

Message (optional):

 

 

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted May 25, 2006
This page last reviewed June 19, 2006

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention