Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA
Fiscal Year 2009 Performance Appendix
 
PDF Icon Fiscal Year 2009 Performance Appendix
(PDF – 1.22 MB)

TELEHEALTH

#

Key Outcomes

FY 2004 Actual

FY 2005 Actual

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

Target

FY

2009

Target

Out-Year Target

Target

Actual

Target

Actual

Long-Term Objective:  Expand the availability of health care, particularly to underserved, vulnerable, and special needs populations.

34.

II.

A.1

Increase the proportion of diabetic patients enrolled in a telehealth diabetes case management program with ideal glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c at or below 7%). (Est. Baseline for 2006 = 10%) a

N/A

N/A

14.5%

Mar-08

21%

Mar-09

30%

14.5%

2011:

30%

34.1

Percent of TNGP grantees that continue to offer services after the TNGP funding has ended. (Baseline: 2006)

 

100%

           

2012:

95%

Long-Term Objective: Promote the implementation of evidence-based methodologies and best practices.

34.

III.

D.2

Expand the number of telehealth services (e.g., dermatology, cardiology) and the number of sites where services are available as a result of the TNGP program.b

463

489

892

Mar-08

943

Mar-09

968

1,371

 

#

Key Outputs

FY 2004 Actual

FY 2005

Actual

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008 Target/ Est.

FY 2009 Target/ Est.

Out-Year Target/ Est.

Target/ Est.

Actual

Target/ Est.

Actual

Long-Term Objective: Promote the implementation of evidence-based methodologies and best practices.

34.

III.

D.1

Increase the number of communities that have access to pediatric and adolescent, and adult mental health services where access did not exist in the community prior to the TNGP grant.

(Baseline – 2003: 79 Peds / 51 Adults)c

99 Peds /

62 Adults

101 Peds /

72 Adults

148 Peds/

 123 Adults

Mar-08

160 Peds / 134 Adults

Mar-09

160 Peds / 134 Adults

207 Peds/ 175 Adults

2011:

219 Peds / 186 Adults

Efficiency Measure

34.E

Expand the number of services and/or sites that provide access to health care as a result of the TNGP program per federal program dollar expended (Baseline – 2003: 105/million) d

119 per million $

125 per million $

104 per million $

Mar-08

116 per million $

Mar-09

121 per million $

106 per million $

 

Appropriated Amount

($ Million)

$3.9

$3.9

 

$6.8

 

$6.8

$6.7

$6.8

 

Notes:

a It is estimated that in the new cohort 10 % of the patients enter in telehealth diabetes case management program with ideal  glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c at or below 7%) and, during the first year, this cohort will achieve a 45% increase to 14.5 percent achieving ideal control.  With funding in FY 07, this cohort of programs will achieve 21% of their patients under control and those in the cohort funded in FY 08 will have 30% of their patients under ideal glycemic control. In 2009, the process begins again with a new cohort of patients entering with 10% having ideal glycemic control, increasing to 14.5% in the first year of the new cohort.

b These targets are cumulative building on the 489 Sites and Services achieved through the 2003-2006 cohort. This cycle will begin again in FY 09 with the new cohort - annual targets would be established based on the 2006-2008 cohort experience. Current targets are ambitious in that grantees continue to face significant barriers to deploying telemedicine and with each new set of grantees, the program funds grantees who add more difficult services, as grantees explore the boundaries of providing these services, e.g., innovative use of telehealth for physical therapy, stroke assessment and post-treatment rehabilitation, teledentistry, etc.

c Because this is a demonstration program, every three years each cohort of TNGP grantees "graduates" from its three-year grant while a new cohort of grantees commences a new three-year cycle of grant-supported telehealth activities.  The data are calculated as a cumulative number. 

d This measure provides the number of sites and services made available to people who otherwise would not have access to them per million dollars of program funds spent. Every three years, a new cohort of grantees commences a new three-year cycle of grant supported activities, gradually expanding sites and services per dollar invested.  With each new cohort, there is a start-up period where services are being put in place but are not yet implemented.  Over the three years of the grant, efficiency increases as grantees implement sites and services. 

INTRODUCTION

The Telehealth Network Grant Program’s (TNGP) performance measures allow the Program to track progress in achieving its objectives of improving access to quality health care services, particularly to rural and other underserved populations, and promoting the implementation of evidence-based technologies and best practices.  Strategies used that support efforts to meet performance targets include sharing best practices, offering technical assistance to grantees, and encouraging grantees to offer specific types of services to address their communities’ needs.

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND TARGETS

Long-Term Objective:  Expand the availability of health care, particularly to underserved, vulnerable, and special needs populations.

34.II.A.I.  Increase the proportion of diabetic patients enrolled in a telehealth diabetes case management program with ideal glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c at or below 7%).

At the end of FY 06, HRSA began to fund a new three-year cohort of grantees under the Telehealth Network Grant Program (TNGP).  It is estimated that in this new cohort 10 % of the patients enter a telehealth diabetes case management program had ideal glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c at or below 7%) and, during the first year, this cohort will achieve a 45% increase to 14.5 percent achieving ideal control. Data for this first year will be available in March 2008.  With funding in FY 07, this cohort of programs is expected to achieve 21% of their patients under control (data available in March 2009) and those funded in FY 08 will have 30% of their patients under ideal glycemic control.  In FY 09, the process begins again with a new cohort of patients entering with 10% having ideal glycemic control, increasing to 14.5% in the first year of the new cohort.  A major challenge to achieving these targets has been the heterogeneity of the projects funded, many of which involve diabetic education primarily, with little direct link to clinical services that measure hemoglobin A1c.  We are currently working with the grantees to obtain the necessary data from affiliated clinical providers. 


34.1.  Percent of Telehealth Network Grant Program (TNGP) grantees that continue to offer services after the TNGP funding has ended.  

(Baseline – 2005: 100%; Target – 2012: 95%)

Sustainability of grant-funded programs resulting in increased access to health care for more Americans is a key objective of this program.  History suggests that 100% of grantees continue to provide some level of telehealth services.  It is reasonable to set a target of 95%, allowing for unforeseen events associated with a more heterogeneous program and changes in the healthcare environment over a period of six years. The Program does not anticipate significant challenges to achieving this target.

Long-Term Objective:  Promote the implementation of evidence-based methodologies and best practices.

34.III.D.2.  Expand the number of telehealth services (e.g., dermatology, cardiology) and the number of sites where services are available as a result of the TNGP program.

The first cohort of grantees in this program was funded in FY 03 and the second funded in FY 06. As grantees mature, learn best practices from other grantees, and learn of new needs in the communities they serve, grantees may make additional telehealth services and service locations available.  It is anticipated that the program will experience a slightly reduced rate of growth in the future, after adjustment for carrying over existing sites that continue into the second cohort, that began in FY 06.  Actual data for the first year of this cohort (FY 06) will be available in March 2008.  The targets for the second cohort of grantees reflect a slight reduction from the first cohort because beginning in FY 06, the program requires that grantees put greater emphasis on evaluating services rather than on expanding the number of sites where services are provided in accordance with Congressional directives.  The targets are cumulative, building on the 489 sites and services made available in the first cohort (2003-2005) through TNGP funding, and are calculated by adding the number of projected services offered by each grantee to the number of sites operated by the grantee’s networks in each year to the baseline (i.e., 489).  FY 09 begins a new cohort of grantees, and the target of 1,371 services and sites assumes a similar rate of growth as experienced in past cohorts. Achieving this target will be dependent on the FY 09 level of funding and whether past trends of gradual growth continue into the future.  Of particular note is the challenge of clinical and payer acceptance, which is influenced by the development of solid models of best practices.  HRSA’s Telehealth programs strive to glean solid models of best practices from the grants that then can support enhanced clinician and payer acceptance of Telehealth services.

34.III.D.1.  Increase the number of communities that have access to pediatric and adolescent, and adult mental health services where access did not exist in the community prior to the TNGP grant. 

(Baseline – 2003: 79 Peds / 51 Adults)

The cumulative targets and data include the first 3-year cohort whose funding began in FY 03, and whose project period ended in August 2006; the second 3-year cohort whose funding began


in FY 06 and whose project period will end in September 2009; the FY 09 target for the first year of the third cohort; and finally the long-term target for FY 11.

With funds awarded in FY 03, 79 communities had access to pediatric and adolescent mental health services and 51 communities had access to adult mental health services as a result of the TNGP grant.  With funds awarded in FY 04, 99 communities had access to pediatric and adolescent mental health services and 62 communities had access to adult mental health services.  Finally, with funds awarded in FY 05, 101 communities had access to pediatric and adolescent mental health services and 72 communities had access to adult mental health services as a result of the TNGP grant, demonstrating the significant impact of the program on expanding access.

The FY 09 cumulative targets of 207 and 175 communities gaining access to pediatric and adult mental health services, respectively, through telehealth networks are based on prior experience.  By FY 11, a total of 219 communities are expected to have gained access to pediatric and adolescent psychiatric services and 186 communities will have gained access to adult psychiatric services that otherwise would not have had them in the absence of the TNGP.  The FY 09 target reflects the beginning of a new cohort of grantees.

These targets take into account the environmental challenges experienced by grantees even when grant funds are available.  For example, difficulty in obtaining services due to the shortage in the supply of mental health specialists and continued low reimbursement for these services.  In the second cohort, 16 programs were funded, but three of the sixteen are required to focus on providing and evaluating tele-home care services in accordance with Congressional directives. Moreover, fewer programs are offering pediatric/mental health services in the second cohort compared to the first (6 programs vs. 10 programs), and the targets reflect this fact.  The number of programs offering these services is difficult to predict as the legislation authorizing the TNGP grants provides grantees with wide discretion as to what they propose to provide, based on community need.  Nevertheless, the Program will continue to encourage applicants in the guidance to propose these services and provide continuing technical assistance to those that do provide services.

34.E.  Expand the number of services and/or sites that provide access to health care as a result of the TNGP program per federal program dollar expended

(Baseline – 2003: 105/million)

One measure of the Telehealth Network Grant Program’s (TNGP) efficiency is the number of sites + services that provide access to health care as a result of the TNGP grant per $1 million Federal program dollars. The Telehealth program’s efficiency measure captures the fundamental underlying mission of the program: namely to expand access to services in underserved communities at an affordable cost.  This is a consistent indicator that can be tracked over time.  For example, with funds awarded in FY 03, grantees were able to achieve an efficiency of 105 sites + services per million dollars appropriated ($3.9 million).  With FY 04 funding, the efficiency factor increased to 119 per million and to 125 per million with FY 05 funds.  In FY 06, a new set of programs was awarded telehealth grants, with slightly more funding ($4.55 million).  The targets for this second cohort of grantees reflect a slight reduction from the first cohort because beginning in FY 06, the program requires that grantees put greater emphasis on evaluating services rather than on expanding the number of sites where services are provided in accordance with Congressional directives. As a result, we anticipate these grantees to have a similar learning curve as the FY 03 cohort, but they will emphasize evaluation of the services provided, possibly resulting in slightly fewer services or sites per million dollars expended.  The target for FY 09 assumes a similar experience in the first year of a new cohort as experienced in previous cohorts, reflecting a decrease in sites and services offered in the first year of a new cohort, a continued increase in tele-home care/home monitoring and an emphasis on evaluation of the quality and cost of services rather than a simple increase in the sites and services provided. It is anticipated that the efficiency will rise each year in the cohort, similar to prior years, as new sites and services are implemented.