Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA
Fiscal Year 2009 Performance Appendix
 
PDF Icon Fiscal Year 2009 Performance Appendix
(PDF – 1.22 MB)

DISCONTINUED MEASURES


HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM

DISCONTINUED MEASURES

Discontinued Measure

I.  IMPROVE ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE

A.  Expand the capacity of the health care safety net

Long-Term Goal:  By 2007, establish an additional 1,200 new or expanded sites.

(Baseline - 2002:  0)

(Target - 2007: 1200)

Measure

FY

Target

Result

1.D.I.A.2.  Increase the infrastructure of the health center program to support an increase in utilization via:

  a) New Starts

2009

NA

 

2008

NA

 

2007

91*

 

2006

53

 

2005

43

 

2004

31

 

2003

40

 

  b) New Satellite Sites

2009

NA

 

2008

NA

 

2007

91*

 

2006

35

 

2005

47

 

2004

30

 

2003

60

 

  Total New Sites

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

182*

202

2006

88

86

2005

90

94

2004

61

63

2003

100

100

Total Sites

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

4013*

4033

2006

3,833

3,831

2005

3,741

3,745

2004

3,649

3,651

2003

3,588

3,588

 c) Expanded Sites

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

120*

135

2006

33

36

2005

63

64

2004

63

66

2003

80

88

 d) Total New or Expanded Sites

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

302*

337

2006

121

122

2005

153

158

2004

124

129

2003

180

188

Data Source:  The Bureau of Health Care Delivery and Assistance Network (BHCDANET) maintains data on all sites that are included in the Health Center grantee's approved scope of project. HRSA Electronic Handbooks (EHBs), a HRSA-wide web based grants management portal, also compiles and maintains Notice of Grant Awards which are issued when new and expanded site funding is awarded to health centers.

Data Validation:  BHCDANET is an agency mainframe system with hard code editing checks built into the operating platform of the mainframe system. 

Cross Reference:   HHS Strategic Objective 1.2

Notes: * FY 07 target differs from that shown in the FY 08 Congressional Justification due to a higher than expected continuing resolution funding level.  The FY 07 target may differ from that shown in budget narrative tables.  Whereas budget narrative tables are continually updated, performance reporting guidelines do not permit (except as noted above) changing a previously established target for the “reporting” year. This measure was deleted during the FY 07 PART reassessment.

1.D.I.A.2.  Increase the infrastructure of the Health Center Program to support an increase in utilization. 

(Indicator:  Total number of new or expanded sites)

(Baseline - 2002:  0)

(Target - 2007: 1200)

As a result of FY 07 activities, Health Center Patients were served through 4,033 comprehensive primary care delivery sites.  The Health Center Program supported a total of 337 new and expanded sites, exceeding its national goal.  This measure was deleted during the FY 07 OMB PART reassessment.



Discontinued Measure

II.  IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES

A.  Expand the availability of health care, particularly to underserved, vulnerable and special needs populations.

Long-Term Goal: Increase percent of the Nation’s poor below 200% of poverty level served by the Health Center Program.*

(Baseline - 2002:  11%)

(Original Target: 2006, 16%)

Measure

FY

Target

Result

1.D.II.A.1.  Continue to assure access to preventive and primary care for low income individuals

(% of Nation’s poor served)

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

14%*

Oct-08**

2006

16%*

15.2%

2005

14%

14.2%

2004

14%

13.2%

2003

13%

12.4%

Data Source:  The Uniform Data System (UDS) collects data on patients and services provided.  National Data: Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) to the Current Population Survey (CPS), U.S. Census Bureau.

Data Validation: UDS data are validated using over 1,000 edit checks, both logical and specific. These include checks for missing data and outliers and checks against history and norms.

Cross Reference:  HHS Strategic Objective 1.2

Notes: *As the Nation’s poor may increase or decrease in number due to external factors beyond the control of Health Centers, an increase in the percentage of the nation’s poor served may not be feasible nor an accurate reflection of the Health Center Program’s performance.

**Dates have been changed to align with the annual availability of U.S. Census data on national poverty levels.   This measure was deleted during the FY 07 PART reassessment.

Long-Term Goal

Increase percent of the Nation’s poor below 200% of poverty level served by the Health Center Program.

(Baseline - 2002:  11%)

(Original Target: 2006, 16%)

1.D.II.A.1.  Continue to assure access to preventive and primary care for low income individuals.

(Indicator:  Percent of nation’s poor served by Health Centers)

With the potential growth in the number of individuals and families in poverty, the FY 07 target for the percentage of the Nation’s poor served by Health Centers was adjusted from 16% to 14% to account for external factors beyond the control of the Health Center Program.  In FY 06, Health Centers served 15.2% of the Nation’s poor.  This measure was deleted during the FY 07 OMB PART reassessment.


Discontinued Measure

II.  IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES

B.  Increase the utilization of preventive health care and chronic disease management services, particularly among underserved, vulnerable and special needs populations.

Long-Term Goal:  Reduce low birth weight rates in health centers.*

(Baseline - 2002:  6.9%)

(Original Target - 2006: 6.53%)

Measure

FY

Target

Result

1.D.II.B.1.  Decrease percent of births to health center prenatal care patients below 2500 grams (LBW).

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

7.05%

Aug-08

2006

7.05%

7.7%

2005

7.05%

7.3%

2004

7.05%

7.01%

2003

6.89%

7.05%

Data Source:  The Uniform Data System (UDS) collects data on patients and services provided. 
Data Validation:  UDS data are validated using over 1,000 edit checks, both logical and specific. These include checks for missing data and outliers and checks against history and norms.
Cross Reference:  HHS Strategic Objectives 1.2, 1.3; HP 2010 (16)
Notes: This measure was deleted during the FY 07 PART reassessment and was replaced by a similar measure.

 

Long-Term Goal

Reduce low birth weight rates in health centers. 

(Baseline - 2002:  6.9%)

(Original Target - 2006:  6.53%)

1.D.II.B.1.  Decrease the percent of births to Health Center patients below 2500 grams (LBW).

Appropriate prenatal care management can have a significant effect on the incidence of low birth weight (LBW).  LBW is the risk factor most closely associated with neonatal mortality; thus improvements in infant birth weight can contribute significantly to reductions in infant mortality rates.  In addition, young mothers, particularly under age 15, and African American mothers are more likely to have LBW infants. These risk factors are reported at a higher rate among Health Center mothers, predisposing Health Center births to higher risk for low birth weight and adverse birth outcomes. 

According to UDS Health Center data for CY 2006, 7.7% of infants born to mothers who sought their prenatal care at Health Centers were born with LBW.  This rate is above the FY 06 target of 7.05, but is still lower than the national 2002 through 2005 rates of 7.8%, 7.9%, 8.1% and 8.2% respectively, despite the fact that Health Center mothers and infants are at greater risk of adverse birth outcomes.  The Health Center rate continues to follow a steady pattern of under 8%, unlike the increases observed in the national rate (Source: Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. National Center for Health Statistics: 2006).   This measure was replaced with a similar measure that is benchmarked to national low birth weight rates, during the FY 07 OMB PART reassessment.




Discontinued Measure

II.  IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES

B.  Increase the utilization of preventive health care and chronic disease management services, particularly among underserved, vulnerable and special needs populations.

Measure

FY

Target

Result

1.D.II.B.2.  Increase percent of adult diabetic patients with at least one testing of glycohemoglobin annually

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

71%

Aug-08

2006

71%

84.7%

363,474

2005

71%

73.8%

258,000*

2004

75%

72.5%

193,000*

2003

 

70.9%

124,000*

2002

 

74.8%

47,600*

1.D.II.B.3.  Increase percent of health center women receiving age appropriate screening for cervical and breast cancer:

a) Up-to-date PAP Tests

(Outcome)

2008

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

NA

NA

2006

NA

NA

2005

D/N/A

D/N/A

2004

D/N/A

D/N/A

2003

D/N/A

D/N/A

2002

95%

87.6%

b) Up-to-date Mammograms

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

NA

NA

2006

NA

NA

2005

D/N/A

D/N/A

2004

D/N/A

D/N/A

2003

D/N/A

D/N/A

2002

75%

75.7%

1.D.II.B.4.  Increase percent of health center adults with hypertension who report their blood pressure is under control.

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

NA

NA

 

2006

NA

NA

2005

D/N/A

D/N/A

2004

D/N/A

D/N/A

2003

D/N/A

D/N/A

2002

96%

91%

Data Source:  Diabetes data are from the Health Disparities Collaboratives (HDC) Database.  Cancer screening and hypertension data are from the 2002 CHC User Survey.

Data Validation: HDC database is maintained by a coordinator that collects health center participant patient data.  CHC User Survey was conducted on a random, representative sample of health centers and patients.

Cross Reference:  HHS Strategic Objectives 1.2, 1.3, 2.3; 1.D.II.B.2.: HP 2010 (5) rate of 50%; 1.D.II.B.3.a.: HP 2010 (3) rate of 90%; 1.D.II.B.3.b.:HP 2010 (3) rate of 70%;  1.D.II.B.4.: HP 2010 (12) rate of 50%

Notes:  NA = Not Applicable D/N/A = Data not available.  *Size of the diabetes patient registry in given year.

1.D.II.B.2, 1.D.II. B.3., 1.D.II.B.4: Other clinical quality and outcome data will be collected annually through the Uniform Data System beginning in 2009.

1.D.II.B.2.  Increase percent of adult diabetic patients with at least one testing of glycohemoglobin annually.

Health Center patients, including low-income individuals of racial/ethnic minority groups and persons who are uninsured, are more likely to suffer from chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes.  Clinical evidence indicates that access to appropriate care can improve the health status of patients with chronic diseases and thus reduce or eliminate disparities.  Managing the glycohemoglobin levels of individuals with diabetes and the blood pressures of individuals with hypertension can have a pronounced effect on their morbidity and mortality.

Based on information from the Health Disparities Collaboratives Program’s diabetes registry, performance in 2002 through 2006 was 74.8%, 70.9%, 72.5%, 73.8% and 84.7%, respectively.  The FY 06 and FY 07 Health Center targets are maintained at 71% of patients with at least one testing of glycohemoglobin annually, well above the HP 2010 goal of 50%.   These Collaboratives data suggest that Health Centers continue to exceed national goals, even with significant growth in the program’s diabetes registry.

Data will no longer be reported for this measure after FY 07 as beginning in 2009, BPHC will be collecting a core set of clinical quality and outcome measures, including measures that focus on the outcome of appropriate management of chronic conditions including diabetes.  These measures will be aligned with those of national quality measurement organizations such as the Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance and the National Quality Forum and will be reported on annually by all grantees through the Uniform Data System.  

1.D.II.B.3.  Increase the percent of Health Center women receiving age-appropriate screening for cervical and breast cancer.

Nationally, patients of racial/ethnic minority groups, of low income, and who are uninsured have less access to appropriate screening and preventive services which results in their higher rates of


morbidity and mortality.  Access to these services can help to eliminate these health status disparities.

Healthy People 2000/2010 include the following national targets for women generally, as tracked by data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS):

1.                  At least 85/90 percent have up-to-date PAP Tests.

2.                  At least 60/70 percent have up-to-date mammograms.

The 2002 Health Center User Survey, comparable to the 2000 National Health Interview Survey showed the following results for Health Center women on mammograms from the most vulnerable population subgroups that traditionally experience access disparities.

Overall, Health Center women from the most vulnerable groups reported being up-to-date on these examinations in higher proportions than did low-income women in the general population. Moreover, uninsured Health Center patients are comparable to the nation’s patients with insurance.  These results demonstrate the Health Center program contribution to reducing national disparities in access to these services.  Screening rates have remained consistent or increased in Health Centers, despite significant program growth and expansion.

  • The 2002 Health Center User Survey pap-test rate (87.6%) is roughly comparable to the 1995 Health Center User Survey rate (88.5%) despite significant Health Center program growth and still exceeds the HP 2000 goal (85%).
     
  • The Health Center pap-test rate does fall short of the HP 2010 goal (90%) and the original goal set for the program (95%).  Future targets are lower and comparable to the HP 2010 goal. 
  • For mammograms, the 2002 Health Center User Survey program rate (75.7%) substantially exceeds the 1995 survey rate (62.5%), HP 2000 goal (60%), revised HP 2010 goal (70%), and program target (75%) (Definition of age-appropriate changed from 50 and over in 1995 to 40 and over in 2002). 

Data will no longer be reported for these measures as beginning in 2009, BPHC will be collecting a core set of clinical quality and outcome measures, including measures that focus on the quality of appropriate preventive care.  These measures will be aligned with those of national quality measurement organizations such as the Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance and the National Quality Forum, and will be reported on annually by all grantees through the Uniform Data System.  

1.D.II.B.4.  Increase the percent of Health Center adults with hypertension who report their blood pressure is under control.

Hypertension is the most prevalent chronic condition facing Health Center patients. Clinical evidence indicates that controlling blood pressure can reduce morbidity and mortality.

The 1995 Health Center User Survey, comparable to the NHIS, showed that 90% of Health Center patients reported their hypertension under control.  The 2002 Health Center User Survey found an overall comparable rate of 91% for Health Center patients with hypertension, and comparable rates to 1995 survey rates for the subgroups of men, women and patients from racial/ethnic minority groups.

Healthy People 2010 includes the following objective for adults generally:  At least 50 percent of patients with hypertension report that their blood pressure is under control.  Not only did the sample of Health Center patients show that they were more than three-times as likely to report blood pressure under control as a comparable national group, but the current rate far exceeds the HP 2010 objective.

Data will no longer be reported for this measure as beginning in 2009, BPHC will be collecting a core set of clinical quality and outcome measures, including measures that focus on the outcome of appropriate management of chronic conditions including hypertension.  These measures will be aligned with those of national quality measurement organizations such as the Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance and the National Quality Forum and will be reported on annually by all grantees through the Uniform Data System.




Discontinued Measure

Efficiency Measures

FY

Target

Result

1.D.E.1.  Sustain the average cost per individual served at health centers*

(Approved by OMB)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

$583

Aug-08

2006

$556

$538

2005

$529

$515

2004

$503

$504

2003

$465

$479

1.D.E.2.  Annual number of patients per medical provider.

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

3,475

Aug-08

2006

3,475

3,470

2005

3,475

3,510

2004

3,475

3,501

2003

3,475

3,521

Data Source:  The Uniform Data System (UDS) collects data on patients and services provided. 

Data Validation: UDS data are validated using over 1,000 edit checks, both logical and specific. These include checks for missing data and outliers and checks against history and norms.

Cross Reference: No cross reference.

Notes: *This measure was deleted during the FY 07 PART reassessment and has been replaced with a similar measure.

1.D.E.1.  Sustain the average cost per individual served at Health Centers.

(Indicator: Total cost divided by total patients)

It is essential that Health Centers maximize the number of patients served per dollar, and tracking their costs is an appropriate process to assure efficiency.  Performance once again exceeded the target in 2006 with an annual average cost per patient of $538, $18 below the national target. This measure was replaced with a similar measure that is benchmarked to national cost increases during the FY 07 OMB PART reassessment process.

1.D.E.2.  Annual number of encounters per medical worker.

(Indicator: Total number of encounters to physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives divided by their respective FTEs)

It is important that Health Centers maximize the number of patients served and assess the number of encounters per medical provider to track their productivity.   Historically, Health Center productivity has generally remained consistent with national standards for primary care, with only slight declines between 1996 and 2003. In the face of significant Health Center expansion, FY 04 and FY 05 figures show that productivity remained relatively stable from the FY 02 level with only a slight decline in FY 06. This measure was deleted during the FY 07 PART reassessment process as new measures were defined.   


HIV/AIDS: RYAN WHITE HIV/AIDS PROGRAM

DISCONTINUED MEASURES

Long-Term Goal:  By 2010, increase the national proportion of people living with HIV receiving primary medical care and treatment to 50 percent (includes all persons who know and those who do not know their serostatus).

(Baseline - 2000:  33%)

Discontinued Measure

FY

Target

Result

16.D.I.A.1.  Increase by 2 percent every second year the number of persons provided services through the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency (CARE) Act program.

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

NA

NA

2006

2% increase over FY 04 or 594,068

Oct-08

2005

NA

NA

2004

582,420

531,000

2003

 

NA

2002

 

571,000 (baseline)

16.D.I.A.1.  Increase by 2 percent every second year the number of persons provided services through the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency (CARE) Act program.

The number of persons provided services through the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program was selected as a measure of the program goal to improve access to health care for individuals infected with HIV/AIDS by increasing availability of and access to care and services.

In FY 04, an estimated 531,000 persons received Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program services, a decrease of 9% from the estimated 571,000 people served in 2002.  HIV care continues to become more complex as new drug therapies are introduced and the number of patients on advanced salvage therapies increases. The decrease in clients served may represent other decreases in funding and increases in cost across the health care system as the numbers represent all HIV infected clients served by our grantees, including those covered by entitlement programs and private insurers.

This measure was discontinued during the FY 2007 PART reassessment.


Discontinued Measure

FY

Target

Result

16.D.IV.A.1. Maintain the number of AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) clients served through State ADAPs during at least one quarter of the year.*

(Outcome)

2008

NA

NA

2007

NA

NA

2006

131,808

132,627

2005

4% over FY 04 or 93,530

131,808

2004

   

2003

   

Notes: NA = Not applicable.  This measure has been replaced by a revised performance measure.

*The way the program collects this data has changed.  Previously the program collected monthly data and currently quarterly data is collected.  The 2005 target is based on the ADAP Monthly Report (AMR).  But the 2005 result and 2006 - 2008 targets are based on the ADAP Quarterly Report.  The program no longer expects to increase ADAP users by 4% per year as originally targeted.  Accordingly, wording of this measure has been revised slightly.

16.D.IV.A.1. Maintain the number of AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) clients served through State ADAPs during at least one quarter of the year.

(This measure has been changed. It previously was "Increase the number of AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) clients receiving HIV/AIDS medications through State ADAPs during at least one month of the year by at least 4 percent"; now it is as stated above.  This reflects client counts and how results are shown.)

The number of ADAP clients served through State ADAPs during at least one quarter of the year was selected as a measure of the program’s goal to eliminate health disparities among individuals with HIV/AIDS who are underserved by increasing availability and utilization of these medications.

The actual FY 06 performance resulted in 132,627 clients served in at least one quarter of the year.  This is 819 additional clients served over the FY 05 results. Many clients are enrolled in ADAP only temporarily while they await acceptance into other insurance programs, like Medicaid.

This measure was replaced by a revised performance measure during the FY 07 PART reassessment.


HIV Care Grants to States (Part B)

Discontinued Measure

Discontinued Measure

FY

Target

Result

18.D.III.A.1. Maintain the number of ADAP clients served through State ADAPs during at least one quarter of the year.

(Outcome)

2009

NA

NA

2008

NA

NA

2007

NA

NA

2006

131,808

132,627

2005

91,314

131,808 clients

2004

   

Notes: NA = Not applicable.

The way the program collects this data has changed.  Previously the program collected monthly data and currently quarterly data is collected. The 2005 target is based on the ADAP Monthly Report (AMR).  But the 2005 result and 2006 - 2008 targets are based on the ADAP Quarterly Report. 

18.D.III.A.1. Maintain the number of ADAP clients served through State ADAPs during at least one quarter of the year.

(This measure has been changed.  It previously was "Increase the number of AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) clients receiving HIV/AIDS medications through State ADAPs during at least one month of the year by at least 4 percent"; now it is as stated above.  This reflects client counts and how results are shown.)

The number of ADAP clients served through State ADAPs during at least one quarter of the year was selected as a measure of the program’s goal to eliminate health disparities among individuals with HIV/AIDS who are underserved by increasing availability and utilization of these medications.

The ADAP program provides therapeutics and purchases health insurance with pharmaceutical coverage to treat HIV disease or prevent the serious deterioration of health arising from HIV disease for eligible individuals. Therapeutics provided by ADAPs includes anti-retrovirals, medications for the treatment and prevention of opportunistic infections, and medications to address side effects that may be experienced by individuals on HIV medications. The performance measure for the ADAP includes all therapeutics provided by the program, not just anti-retrovirals.

The actual FY 06 performance resulted in 132,627 clients served in at least one quarter of the year. This is 819 additional clients over the FY 05 results. Many clients are enrolled in ADAP only temporarily while they await acceptance into other insurance programs, like Medicaid.

This performance measure was revised during the FY 07 PART reassessment to relate to clients served annually.