FFY1999 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated
| 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail
| 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer
Education | Reason for Care Chart
| Ages Chart
Entire collection of tables and charts is available as a
single MS Word document. |
Related Item: FFY1998 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Child
Care and Development Fund
|
States/ Territories |
Licensed or
Regulated Providers
|
Providers Legally
Operating without Regulation
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child's Home
|
Family Home
|
Group Home
|
Center |
Child's Home |
Family Home |
Group Home |
Center |
||||
Relative |
Non-Relative
|
Relative |
Non-Relative
|
Relative |
Non-Relative
|
||||||
Alabama |
-
|
9%
|
6%
|
59%
|
-
|
-
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17%
|
Alaska |
-
|
11%
|
2%
|
42%
|
1%
|
3%
|
11%
|
29%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
American Samoa |
-
|
-
|
-
|
100%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Arizona |
-
|
10%
|
4%
|
74%
|
2%
|
-
|
10%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Arkansas |
1%
|
18%
|
-
|
80%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
California |
-
|
9%
|
5%
|
70%
|
2%
|
1%
|
8%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
Colorado |
-
|
20%
|
-
|
56%
|
2%
|
8%
|
8%
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Connecticut |
-
|
6%
|
-
|
39%
|
39%
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
Delaware |
-
|
34%
|
2%
|
47%
|
4%
|
-
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8%
|
District of Columbia |
-
|
4%
|
-
|
94%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Florida |
-
|
9%
|
-
|
79%
|
-
|
1%
|
2%
|
2%
|
-
|
-
|
6%
|
Georgia |
-
|
9%
|
2%
|
78%
|
-
|
2%
|
3%
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Guam |
-
|
-
|
1%
|
36%
|
18%
|
-
|
-
|
42%
|
-
|
-
|
3%
|
Hawaii |
-
|
7%
|
-
|
17%
|
5%
|
5%
|
52%
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
4%
|
Idaho |
-
|
-
|
15%
|
45%
|
1%
|
1%
|
19%
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Illinois |
-
|
12%
|
1%
|
28%
|
11%
|
21%
|
22%
|
3%
|
-
|
-
|
2%
|
Indiana |
-
|
17%
|
-
|
26%
|
4%
|
3%
|
17%
|
24%
|
-
|
-
|
8%
|
Iowa |
-
|
25%
|
12%
|
36%
|
1%
|
1%
|
8%
|
18%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Kansas |
-
|
8%
|
42%
|
36%
|
3%
|
4%
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Kentucky |
-
|
4%
|
1%
|
64%
|
2%
|
1%
|
13%
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Louisiana |
-
|
-
|
-
|
51%
|
18%
|
14%
|
2%
|
15%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Maine |
-
|
18%
|
-
|
23%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
3%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Maryland |
-
|
31%
|
-
|
35%
|
16%
|
7%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Massachusetts |
-
|
6%
|
18%
|
57%
|
6%
|
10%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Michigan |
-
|
8%
|
8%
|
14%
|
16%
|
15%
|
39%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Minnesota |
-
|
39%
|
-
|
28%
|
7%
|
3%
|
9%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
3%
|
Mississippi |
-
|
-
|
2%
|
80%
|
6%
|
2%
|
6%
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Missouri |
-
|
13%
|
1%
|
33%
|
-
|
-
|
24%
|
24%
|
-
|
-
|
4%
|
Montana |
-
|
21%
|
33%
|
32%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Nebraska |
-
|
35%
|
7%
|
57%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Nevada |
-
|
4%
|
-
|
69%
|
2%
|
-
|
2%
|
6%
|
-
|
-
|
16%
|
New Hampshire |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
New Jersey |
-
|
11%
|
-
|
74%
|
1%
|
-
|
4%
|
10%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
New Mexico |
-
|
2%
|
4%
|
40% -
|
-
|
-
|
40%
|
13%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
New York |
-
|
12%
|
6%
|
33%
|
7%
|
8%
|
12%
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
North Carolina |
-
|
12%
|
1%
|
82%
|
-
|
-
|
3%
|
1%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
North Dakota |
-
|
43%
|
27%
|
29%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Northern Mariana Islands |
-
|
71%
|
-
|
29%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Ohio |
-
|
35%
|
1%
|
64%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Oklahoma |
-
|
18%
|
-
|
81%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Oregon |
-
|
21%
|
1%
|
17%
|
5%
|
9%
|
13%
|
30%
|
-
|
-
|
5%
|
Pennsylvania |
-
|
8%
|
3%
|
54%
|
2%
|
4%
|
6%
|
23%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Puerto Rico |
-
|
3%
|
9%
|
50%
|
2%
|
2%
|
19%
|
15%
|
-
|
1%
|
-
|
Rhode Island |
-
|
4%
|
-
|
63%
|
3%
|
6%
|
23%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
South Carolina |
-
|
5%
|
3%
|
77%
|
-
|
3%
|
-
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
South Dakota |
-
|
41%
|
8%
|
30%
|
3%
|
2%
|
13%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Tennessee |
-
|
7%
|
5%
|
73%
|
1%
|
-
|
2%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Texas |
-
|
3%
|
3%
|
78%
|
7%
|
-
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Utah |
-
|
9%
|
4%
|
37%
|
1%
|
1%
|
16%
|
31%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Vermont |
-
|
46%
|
-
|
41%
|
2%
|
2%
|
4%
|
5%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Virgin Islands |
-
|
-
|
14%
|
54%
|
3%
|
1%
|
11%
|
9%
|
-
|
-
|
9%
|
Virginia |
-
|
26%
|
-
|
54%
|
1%
|
-
|
14%
|
4%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Washington |
-
|
24%
|
-
|
40%
|
12%
|
12%
|
12%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
West Virginia |
-
|
46%
|
1%
|
41%
|
-
|
-
|
11%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
Wisconsin |
-
|
36%
|
-
|
64%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Wyoming |
-
|
10%
|
15%
|
31%
|
9%
|
5%
|
15%
|
16%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
National Average |
-
|
13%
|
4%
|
55%
|
5%
|
5%
|
10%
|
7%
|
-
|
-
|
1%
|
Notes:
- New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type.
- Maine and Montana submitted data but the number of children by setting type did not add up to the total number of children listed for their states.
- Totals may not add up because of rounding errors.
- The source for this table is ACF-800 data from FFY1999.
![]() |
Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |
Related Item: FFY1998 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |