Child Care Bureau: Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)

CCDF FFY 1998 Tables and Charts

Related Item: CCDF FFY 1999 Data and Tables

Table 6
Child Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 1998)

State	Total % of Children	Licensed or Regulated Providers				Providers Legally Operating without Regulation
		Child's Home	Family Home	Group Home	Center	Child's Home		Family Home		Group Home		Center
		Child's Home	Family Home	Group Home	Center	Relative	Non-Relative	Relative	Non-Relative	Relative	Non-Relative	Center
Alabama	100%	-	10%	6%	59%	0%	0%	10%	0%	-	-	15%
Alaska	100%	0%	16%	3%	35%	2%	3%	11%	30%	-	-	-
American Samoa	100%	-	1%	-	99%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Arizona	100%	0%	10%	4%	73%	2%	-	10%	-	-	-	-
Arkansas	100%	-	18%	-	82%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
California	100%	-	7%	6%	70%	5%	2%	6%	4%	-	-	1%
Colorado	100%	-	19%	-	57%	2%	7%	8%	6%	-	-	0%
Connecticut	100%	-	6%	0%	36%	41%	16%	-	-	-	-	1%
Delaware	100%	-	34%	1%	48%	4%	0%	5%	-	-	-	7%
District of Columbia	100%	-	4%	-	94%	-	1%	1%	-	-	-	-
Florida	100%	-	8%	-	80%	1%	0%	2%	4%	-	-	5%
Georgia	100%	-	7%	2%	76%	1%	3%	4%	8%	-	-	-
Guam	100%	-	-	-	39%	18%	-	37%	2%	1%	2%	1%
Hawaii	100%	-	8%	0%	22%	3%	3%	45%	12%	-	-	5%
Idaho	100%	-	-	14%	44%	0%	1%	17%	22%	-	-	-
Illinois	100%	-	11%	1%	29%	11%	21%	22%	4%	-	-	2%
Indiana	100%	2%	14%	-	30%	5%	3%	16%	23%	-	-	6%
Iowa	100%	-	23%	10%	33%	1%	1%	10%	22%	-	-	-
Kansas	100%	-	9%	41%	36%	3%	4%	6%	-	-	-	-
Kentucky	100%	-	5%	1%	61%	1%	1%	9%	23%	-	-	-
Louisiana	100%	-	-	-	49%	22%	14%	2%	13%	-	-	-
Maine	65%	-	28%	-	29%	0%	0%	2%	5%	-	-	-
Maryland	100%	-	31%	-	34%	16%	7%	12%	0%	-	-	0%
Massachusetts	100%	-	6%	17%	56%	5%	12%	3%	-	-	-	-
Michigan	100%	-	11%	9%	19%	14%	17%	30%	-	-	-	0%
Minnesota	100%	-	42%	-	24%	4%	3%	10%	14%	-	-	3%
Mississippi	100%	-	-	1%	69%	9%	3%	10%	8%	-	-	-
Missouri	100%	-	15%	2%	37%	0%	0%	21%	22%	-	0%	3%
Montana	100%	0%	21%	34%	30%	0%	0%	1%	14%	-	-	-
Nebraska	100%	-	32%	9%	58%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nevada	100%	-	3%	2%	70%	2%	2%	2%	7%	-	-	11%
New Hampshire	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
New Jersey	100%	-	10%	-	74%	1%	0%	4%	10%	-	-	-
New Mexico	100%	-	5%	4%	43%	2%	2%	25%	18%	-	-	-
New York	100%	-	11%	7%	41%	5%	5%	11%	19%	-	-	-
North Carolina	100%	-	11%	1%	81%	1%	0%	5%	1%	-	-	0%
North Dakota	100%	-	44%	27%	26%	3%	-	-	-	-	-	-
Northern Mariana Islands	100%	58%	31%	-	11%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Ohio	100%	0%	35%	1%	65%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Oklahoma	100%	0%	19%	-	81%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Oregon	100%	0%	21%	1%	16%	5%	9%	14%	30%	-	0%	5%
Pennsylvania	100%	-	7%	4%	59%	5%	16%	1%	7%	-	-	-
Puerto Rico	100%	-	-	-	65%	1%	0%	12%	8%	6%	8%	-
Rhode Island	100%	-	8%	0%	64%	4%	6%	18%	-	-	-	0%
South Carolina	100%	-	5%	3%	76%	-	3%	-	13%	-	-	-
South Dakota	100%	-	44%	6%	27%	4%	2%	14%	3%	-	-	-
Tennessee	100%	-	7%	5%	73%	1%	0%	1%	14%	-	-	-
Texas	100%	-	3%	3%	79%	7%	-	7%	-	-	-	-
Utah	100%	-	9%	5%	65%	2%	2%	6%	11%	-	-	-
Vermont	100%	-	50%	-	44%	0%	6%	-	-	-	-	-
Virgin Islands	100%	-	-	6%	62%	3%	0%	16%	8%	-	-	5%
Virginia	100%	0%	26%	-	54%	2%	0%	15%	3%	-	-	0%
Washington	100%	-	23%	-	41%	12%	12%	11%	-	-	-	-
West Virginia	100%	-	50%	-	39%	0%	0%	10%	-	-	-	1%
Wisconsin	100%	0%	39%	-	60%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Wyoming	100%	-	24%	-	31%	8%	6%	16%	16%	-	-	-
Percentage	100%	0%	13%	3%	55%	6%	6%	9%	6%	0%	0%	1%

Notes applicable to this table:

1. The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 1998. The ACF-800 is based on an annual unduplicated count of families and children; i.e. a family or child that receives one hour of service on one day is counted the same as a family or child that receives full-time care throughout the fiscal year.

2. All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages. The District of Columbia reported a pooling factor of only 5%.

3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. A "-" indicates that the reported figure is 0 or not reported.

4. Maine and New Hampshire did not report a consistent and/or complete ACF-800 for FFY 1998.

Related Item: CCDF FFY 1999 Data and Tables

CCDF FFY 1998 Tables and Charts

Table 6 Child Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 1998)

Table 6
Child Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 1998)