Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

FFY1999 CCDF Data Tables and Charts

Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart

Entire collection of tables and charts is available as a single MS Word document.

Related Item: FFY1998 CCDF Data Tables and Charts
 

Child Care and Development Fund
Of Children Served in Settings Legally Operating without Regulation, Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives (FFY1999)


States/Territories
Relative
Non - Relative
Alabama
34%
66%
Alaska
29%
72%
American Samoa
-
-
Arizona
100%
-
Arkansas
-
100%
California
62%
39%
Colorado
43%
57%
Connecticut
72%
28%
Delaware
49%
51%
District of Columbia
74%
26%
Florida
17%
83%
Georgia
24%
76%
Guam
29%
71%
Hawaii
75%
25%
Idaho
47%
53%
Illinois
56%
44%
Indiana
37%
63%
Iowa
31%
69%
Kansas
73%
27%
Kentucky
48%
52%
Louisiana
41%
59%
Maine
38%
62%
Maryland
79%
21%
Massachusetts
49%
51%
Michigan
78%
22%
Minnesota
45%
55%
Mississippi
66%
34%
Missouri
46%
54%
Montana
10%
90%
Nebraska
-
-
Nevada
15%
85%
New Hampshire
-
-
New Jersey
30%
70%
New Mexico
75%
25%
New York
40%
60%
North Carolina
80%
20%
North Dakota
-
-
Northern Mariana Islands
-
-
Ohio
-
-
Oklahoma
-
-
Oregon
29%
71%
Pennsylvania
22%
78%
Puerto Rico
56%
44%
Rhode Island
80%
20%
South Carolina
1%
99%
South Dakota
74%
26%
Tennessee
18%
82%
Texas
100%
-
Utah
36%
64%
Vermont
43%
57%
Virgin Islands
41%
59%
Virginia
79%
21%
Washington
67%
33%
West Virginia
91%
9%
Wisconsin
-
-
Wyoming
53%
47%
National Average Percent
54%
46%

Notes:

  1. Totals may not add up because of rounding errors.
  2. New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type.
  3. Nebraska, North Dakota, Northern Marianas, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin did not report having any children served in settings legally operating without a license.
  4. The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 1999.
Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart
Related Item: FFY1998 CCDF Data Tables and Charts