Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h7LKnW726671; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <p0510030cbb6adf7e533a@[128.148.147.35]> Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Janet Isserlis <Janet_Isserlis@Brown.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:2674] Re: Discussion list guidelines X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Status: O Content-Length: 994 Lines: 28 This is an interesting request, Daphne, and one which I imagine other moderators may have received, given the fact that a recent post was cross-posted to many lists today. Specifically, I wonder how we differentiate information that this list might want to be made aware of - and can only be made aware of by being alerted to said information -- without necessarily being in a position to advocate per se. Is informing, conveying information about policy - that impacts the work we do in literacy - specifically covered in the guidelines. I guess we should all re-read those guidelines another time. Thank you, Daphne for moderating; I understand that this request is not yours. Janet Isserlis >I have been asked to remind list participants about the NIFL discussion list >guidelines posted at: > >http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/list_guidelines.html > >Specifically, any posting regarding policies and advocacy should be >posted to the AAACE-NLA list. > >Thanks! >Daphne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:50 EST