Background on Corporation for National and Community Service
The Corporation for National and Community Service is a federal agency
that encourages Americans of all ages and backgrounds to engage in
community-based service. Through its Senior Corps, AmeriCorps, and Learn and
Serve America programs, the Corporation has engaged citizens of all ages and
backgrounds in helping to meet pressing local needs for more than a decade.
The Corporation’s programs provide human and other resources to community-
and faith-based groups to empower them to meet local needs in education, the
environment, public safety, disaster preparedness and homeland security, and
other critical areas. This year, more than two million individuals of all
ages and backgrounds will serve through Corporation supported programs, and
those individuals will recruit, train, and manage an additional one million
community volunteers. National and community service programs also work
closely with America’s volunteer-connector organizations to increase the
number and impact of our nation’s volunteers, and with schools and nonprofit
groups to foster the ethic of good citizenship.
The Corporation makes grants to organizations that use citizen service as
a strategy to meet critical national and community needs, foster an ethic of
civic responsibility, and strengthen the ties that bind us together as a
nation. Each year the Corporation seeks qualified individuals to serve as
peer reviewers and facilitators for its grant competition process.
If you would like to serve as a peer reviewer or a facilitator for a
grant review and have not already completed an application in eGrants,
please read further and complete the required Peer Reviewer application at
https://egrants.cns.gov/espan/main/newaccount.jsp. If you know
someone who may be interested, please forward this information to them.
What is a Peer Review?
The Corporation uses external professionals and peers from the field as
reviewers to read competitive applications, provide an analysis of the
quality of each application, and rate them based on published criteria. The
Corporation in turn considers these peer reviewer comments and ratings along
with other information, in determining which program applications to fund.
What are the responsibilities of Reviewers?
The primary responsibilities of reviewers are to participate in all
training provided, and to read, analyze, and rate applications. This is done
utilizing worksheets, forms and documents prepared for the review. Depending
on the process for a particular grant competition, reviewers may participate
in conference calls, and/or may travel at the Corporation’s expense to a
central meeting site for reviewer meetings.
What are the responsibilities of Facilitators?
A facilitator’s primary responsibilities are to guide and support the
work of the reviewers; to ensure thoughtful, fair, well-documented
appraisals of all applications; to ensure that panelists keep to the
schedule; and to manage the writing responsibilities. Facilitators also help
resolve any conflicts among the panelists and guide them to consensus on the
quality of proposals. Facilitators participate in all training and necessary
conference calls, fill out all required forms, and may travel at the
Corporation’s expense to a central meeting site for reviewer meetings.
What are the qualifications of Reviewers and Facilitators?
We seek a diverse group of peer reviewers and facilitators who have
expertise in one or more areas of civic engagement (i.e., national service,
volunteer management, education, literacy and tutoring, human services,
nonprofit management, homeland security, public safety, and the environment)
who can use their knowledge to assess the quality of grant applications.
Reviewers and facilitators must be comfortable working with non-negotiable
deadlines.
You may be a practitioner, educator, administrator/manager, analyst,
researcher, evaluator, or volunteer. You may work or volunteer in community
or faith-based organizations; national organizations; national or community
foundations; municipal, state, or federal agencies; higher education; or
elementary, middle, or high school.
Peer reviewers should also be comfortable reading a large volume of
material in a short period of time and providing written detailed analysis
and/or participating in small group discussions via conference call or in
person, with others who have read the same application.
Facilitators should have skills and experience facilitating small groups.
Facilitators need to be comfortable reading a large volume of material in a
short period and willing to hold reviewers accountable for their review
responsibilities.
The Corporation conducts its peer reviews using its online/web-based
eGrants system. Reviewers and facilitators must have access to a computer
and the internet throughout the review time.
Reviewers and facilitators are selected for competitions based on
background and education specific to a review. Once you have completed an
application in eGrants, and your background is appropriate for a
competition, a CNCS representative contacts you by phone or e-mail to check
on your availability to participate in that review. We often have more peer
review applicants than we may need for the year, but we will maintain your
application in our database for future reviews.
What is the time commitment for participating in a review?
The Corporation’s peer review process is a time-intensive and
time-sensitive activity. The components of a review and an estimate for the
amount of time each item takes are as follows:
- Orientation conference calls and review of instructions for each
review: 2 to 4 hours;
- 5 to 7 hours per application reviewed (reading, completing all
documents, entering into eGrants, participating in panel discussions [if
applicable], reviewing and certifying final forms); and
- Travel time (if applicable).
The time commitment ranges from 30 hours over a five day period to 60
hours over a 15 day period.
What are other benefits of being a peer reviewer or facilitator?
You will be exposed to new and innovative ideas in your field, engage in
the grant-making process for a major funder of the service and volunteer
sector and meet and network with experts in your profession from around the
country. Many reviewers consider this an excellent professional development
opportunity.
Is there a deadline?
We invite facilitator and reviewer applicants to complete the on-line
peer review application in eGrants at any time. CNCS staff regularly review
submitted applications and determine if your experiences match the expertise
needed for specific reviews. You may want to review the funding notices to
get a sense of when reviewers might be needed (http://www.nationalservice.gov/for_organizations/funding/index.asp).
If I work or serve in a Corporation-funded program or my organization is
applying for Corporation funds, may I serve as a reviewer or facilitator?
You may not serve as a reviewer or facilitator in the type of program for
which you work or serve. For instance, if you are part of an organization
with an AmeriCorps*National grant, you may not review AmeriCorps*National
applications. However, you may review for a different type of AmeriCorps
grant program, or for Learn and Serve or other competitions.
Likewise, if you work at an institution of higher education that is
applying for a Learn and Serve America grant, you may not review higher
education applications. However, your expertise might be needed in Learn and
Serve America School and Community-Based applications.
What happens next?
If you wish to be considered as a peer reviewer or facilitator, complete
the peer review application found at
https://egrants.cns.gov/espan/main/newaccount.jsp. Again, if your
education and expertise align with a particular competition, a CNCS
representative will contact you by phone or e-mail to check on your
availability.
Who do I contact if I have a question?
If you have specific questions about the content of the peer reviewer
application, please e-mail us at
peerreviewers@cns.gov.
|