![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() |
FHWA CORPORATE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY![]() Effectively Communicating the Federal Highway Administration's Research and Technology Program |
TECHNOLOGIES LIST
|
![]()
|
Research Portfolio | Ongoing Research | Innovation Life Cycle | Roadmaps | Deployment Priority, Market-Ready Technologies and Innovations ListPrefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PFBES)Problem: Transportation agencies are challenged to improve safety, reduce congestion, and undertake necessary construction projects The top priority of transportation agencies is to stem the loss of more than 40,000 lives each year to crashes. At the same time, transportation agencies are committed to offering motorists high-quality, longer lasting highways and bridges while reducing construction time and traffic congestion that, taken together, cost the Nation $63 billion each year in wasted time and fuel. These agencies, however, also operate against a backdrop of challenges: a need for intensified construction activities to restore the Nations aging transportation system, which largely was built in the 1950s and 1960s; capacity that has increased little in the past two decades; and growing communities and increasing traffic volumes. Solution: Prefabrication minimizes traffic disruptions Prefabricated bridge construction can help minimize traffic delays and community disruptions by reducing onsite construction time and improving quality, traffic control, and safety. Using prefabricated bridge elements and systems means that time-consuming formwork construction, curing, and other tasks associated with fabrication can be done off site in a controlled environment without affecting traffic.
Successful Applications: More than 11 States are actively pursuing PFBES as a standard practice. The Washington State Department of Transportation, for example, used prefabricated elements to replace 1,189 meters (3,900 feet) of bridge deck on the Lewis and Clark Bridge over a period of 120 nights, with 4 weekend closures and little or no impact on rush-hour traffic. The Virginia Department of Transportation replaced a bridge along Interstate 95 over the James River using prefabricated elements. The project took place over 135 nights, with no road closures during rush-hour traffic. Both of these projects were not just completed faster, but also came in under budget, at a price lower than the engineer's estimate. Deployment Statement Using PFBES reduces traffic and environmental impacts by minimizing the need for lane closures, detours, and the use of narrow lanes. Deployment Goal By 2008, PFBES technology will be used on a regular basis in 34 States. Deployment Status Three States have built 20 or more PFBES bridges, including New York, Texas, and Washington State. An additional eight States, including Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, are actively pursuing PFBES as a standard practice. Other states also are moving toward this technology. Additional Resources Visit the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) PFBES Web site at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/prefab/. For More Information Contact: Vasant Mistry, FHWA Office of Bridge Technology Raj Ailaney, FHWA Resource Center
To request additional copies of this publication, contact: TaMara McCrae
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
This page last modified on 06/05/08
|
![]() Priority, Market-Ready T&I List
Deployment LinksOther Links |