US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census > ACS Main > About the Data (Methodology) Main > ACS 1999-2001 and Census 2000 Comparison Study

  
About the Data (Methodology) Main

ACS 1999-2001 and Census 2000 Comparison Study

Multiyear Estimates Study

Data Collection & Processing

Evaluation Report Series

Papers/Presentations
  »  2003 ASA Documents
  »  Working Papers

2006 ACS Content Test
  » Report Series

 

Analytical Reports

Census Reports

There are two Census Bureau research reports that analyze all 36 counties and their tract data. These reports provide a summary of the findings across all of the counties and tracts for the estimates and quality measures.

Comparison of the ACS 3-year Average and the Census 2000 Sample for a Sample of Counties and Tracts by Gregg Diffendal, Rita Petroni and Andre Williams [PDF]

Comparing Quality Measures: Comparing the American Community Survey’s Three-year Averages and Census 2000’s Long Form Sample Estimates by Katie Bench [PDF]

Local Area Expert Reports1

In addition to the Census Bureau reports, four local experts were contracted to provide site-specific analysis of this data. Using local knowledge of their counties, they provide interpretations of this data from a data users perspective. We encourage other researchers who are contemplating analyzing this data to examine these reports.

Small Area Data Quality: A Comparison of Estimates 2000 Census and the 1999-2001 ACS Bronx, New York Test Site by Joseph Salvo, Peter Lobo and Timothy Calabrese [PDF]

The 1999-2001 American Community Survey and the 2000 Census--Data Quality and Data Comparisons--Multnomah County, Oregon by George Hough and Dave Swanson [PDF]

Comparison of Census 2000 and American Community Survey 1999-2001 Estimates - San Francisco and Tulare Counties California by Linda Gage [PDF]

American Community Survey and Census Comparison -Final Analytical Report -Oneida and Vilas Counties, Wisconsin - Flathead and Lake Counties, Montana by Paul Van Auken, Roger Hammer, Paul Voss, and Daniel Veroff [PDF]


1The data used in the expert’s reports may differ slightly from the data shown in the data tables and files. The experts used data files that were not final. Most of the changes occurred in the standard error estimates for a few items.

 
 
 

[PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe. This symbol Symbol indicating that file is external to this site. indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.

 
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: September 30, 2008