skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov

Previous Section

Content Last Revised: 11/18/47
---DISCLAIMER---

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to ESA

Title 29  

Labor

 

Chapter V  

Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor

 

 

Part 790  

General Statement As to the Effect of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 on the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938


29 CFR 790.22 - Discretion of court as to assessment of liquidated damages.

  • Section Number: 790.22
  • Section Name: Discretion of court as to assessment of liquidated damages.

    (a) Section 11 of the Portal Act provides that in any action brought 
under the Fair Labor Standards Act to recover unpaid minimum wages, 
unpaid overtime, compensation, or liquidated damages, the court may, 
subject to prescribed conditions, in its sound discretion award no 
liquidated damages or award any amount of such damages not to exceed the 
amount specified in section 16 (b) of the Fair Labor Standards 
Act.137
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    137 Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act provides 
that an employer who violates the minimum--wage or overtime provisions 
of the act shall be liable to the affected employees not only for the 
amount of the unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation, as 
the case may be, but also for an additional equal amount as liquidated 
damages. The courts have held that this provision is ``not penal in its 
nature'' but rather that such damages ``constitute compensation for the 
retention of a workman's pay'' where the required wages are not paid 
``on time.'' Under this provision of the law, the courts have held that 
the liability of an employer for liquidated damages in an amount equal 
to his underpayments of required wages become fixed at the time he fails 
to pay such wages when due, and the courts were given no discretion, 
prior to the enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act, to relieve him of 
any portion of this liability. See Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil, 324 
U.S. 697; Overnight Motor Transp. Co. v. Missel, 316 U.S. 572.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (b) The conditions prescribed as prerequisites to such an exercise 
of discretion by the court are two: (1) The employers must show to the 
satisfaction of the court that the act or omission giving rise to such 
action was in good faith; and (2) he must show also, to the satisfaction 
of the court, that he had reasonable grounds for believing that his act 
or omission was not a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. If 
these conditions are met by the employer against whom the suit is 
brought, the court is permitted, but not required, in its sound 
discretion to reduce or eliminate the liquidated damages which would 
otherwise be required in any judgment against the employer. This may be 
done in any action brought under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor 
Standards Act, regardless of whether the action was instituted prior to 
or on or after May 14, 1947, and regardless of when the employee 
activities on which it is based were engaged in. If, however, the 
employer does not show to the satisfaction of the court that he has met 
the two conditions mentioned above, the court is given no discretion by 
the statute, and it continues to be the duty of the court to award 
liquidated damages.138
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    138 See Conference Report, p. 17; remarks of Representative 
Walter, 93 Cong. Rec. 1496-1497; President's message of May 14, 1947, to 
the Congress on approval of the Portal Act, 93 Cong. Rec. 5281.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) What constitutes good faith on the part of an employer and 
whether he had reasonable grounds for believing that his act or omission 
was not a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act are mixed questions 
of fact and law, which should be determined by objective tests.139 
Where an employer makes the required showing, it is for the court to 
determine in its sound discretion what would be just according to the 
law on the facts shown.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    139 Cf. Secs. 790.13 to 790.16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (d) Section 11 of the Portal Act does not change the provisions of 
section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act under which attorney's 
fees and court costs are recoverable when judgment is awarded to the 
plaintiff.
Previous Section



Phone Numbers