[NIFL-ESL:8653] Re: Regarding Current Discussion

From: Charles Jannuzi (jannuzi@edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 20:42:10 EST


Received: from icpc11s.icpc.fukui-u.ac.jp (icpc11s.icpc.fukui-u.ac.jp [133.7.1.11]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h1R1d6P10080 for <nifl-esl@nifl.gov>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:39:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from icpc00.icpc.fukui-u.ac.jp (icpc00.icpc.fukui-u.ac.jp [133.7.6.10]) by icpc11s.icpc.fukui-u.ac.jp (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h1R1d6d8027623 for <nifl-esl@nifl.gov>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:39:06 +0900 (JST)
Received: from edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp (edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp [133.7.28.100]) by icpc00.icpc.fukui-u.ac.jp (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h1R1d6Nq012543 for <nifl-esl@nifl.gov>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:39:06 +0900 (JST)
Received: from CJSLITT (cjsllit.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp [133.7.21.9]) by edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id h1R1d5kX029627 for <nifl-esl@nifl.gov>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:39:05 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <004601c2de01$7245b620$09150785@fedu.fukuiu.ac.jp>
Reply-To: "Charles Jannuzi" <jannuzi@edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp>
From: "Charles Jannuzi" <jannuzi@edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp>
To: <nifl-esl@nifl.gov>
References: <2E3AC3356942D511B8A30008C7AAAC0808237B7C@wdcrobexc10.ed.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8653] Re: Regarding Current Discussion
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:42:10 +0900
Organization: Fukui University
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Status: O
Content-Length: 1085
Lines: 28

> It is not our policy to arbitrate discussion on the lists; NIFL
appreciates
> your understanding and cooperation in this matter.

Nor is anyone asking you to censor it, OK? A discussion is between at least
two parties and is open-ended communication. Therefore, it is not up to this
or that one person to control. Otherwise there would be no communication, no
exchange, no change of points of views, no chance at all at understanding.

I would suggest to list readers the following:

1. post more: a mature list is capable of multiple threads

2. delete topics and posts from people you don't like

Remember, frequent discussants don't join a list so that they have two
hundred individual messages from either like-minded or opposing points of
view asking them things offlist. If you use lists professionally, it's just
impossible to take everything offlist. That is why lists exist. To reach as
many people--often people you don't know at all--with the least amount of
effort.

Censor what you read by controlling the input channel, not what others
write.

Regards
Charles Jannuzi



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:06 EST