|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Tripler Army Medical Center |
Information provided by: | Tripler Army Medical Center |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00294242 |
The purpose of this study is to determine if routine membrane sweeping in uncomplicated term pregnancies increases the rate of pre-labor rupture of membranes.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
Pregnancy Prelabor Rupture of Membranes |
Procedure: membrane sweeping |
Phase III |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety Study |
Official Title: | Does Routine Membrane Sweeping in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies Increase the Rate of Prelabour Rupture of Membranes |
Estimated Enrollment: | 300 |
Study Start Date: | February 2006 |
Show Detailed Description |
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 50 Years |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Micah J Hill, D.O. | 808-433-5943 | micah.hill@haw.tamc.amedd.army.mil |
Contact: Grant McWilliams, D.O. | 808-433-1815 | grant.mcwilliams@haw.tamc.amedd.army.mil |
United States, Hawaii | |||||
Tripler Army Medical Center | |||||
TAMC, Hawaii, United States, 96859 |
Tripler Army Medical Center |
Principal Investigator: | Micah J Hill, D.O. | United States Army |
1. Bulware et al. Membrane sweeping for induction of labor. The Cochrane Database for induction of labor 2005, 2 (no page number)
2. Magann et al. Can we decrease postadtism in women with an unfavorable cervix and a negative fetal fibronectin test result at term by serial membrane sweeping? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 179(4): 890-894
3. CammuH, Haitsma V. Sweeping membranes at 39 weeks in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 1998: 105(1): 41-4
4. Boulvain et al. Does sweeping of the membranes reduce the need for formal induction of labour? A randomized controlled trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 105(1): 34040
5. Allott HA, Palmer CR. Sweeping the membranes: a valid procedure in stimulating the onset of labour? Brit J Obstet Gynecol 1993, 100(10): 889-90
6. Wong et al. Does sweeping of membranes beyond 40 weeks reduce the need for formal incution of labour? Brit J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 109(6): 632-6
7. Sweeping of the membranes is an effective method of induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy: a report of a randomized trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 1992, 100(10): 898-903
8. McColgin et al. Partuitional factors associated with membrane stripping. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993, 169(1): 71-77
9. Keirse et al. Chronic stimulation of uterine prostaglandin synthesis during cervical ripening before the onset of labor. Prostaglandins, 1983, 25(5): 671-82
10. Goldenberg et al. Stretching of the cervix and stripping of the membranes at term: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 66(2): 129-32
11. Tannirandorn Y, Jumrustanasan T. A comparative study of membrane stripping and nonstripping for induction of labor in term pregnancy. J Med Assoc of Thailand 1999, 82(3): 229-32
12. Williams Obstetrics. McGraww-Hill Companies. New York, NY. 2000, 440-1.
13. Maternal-Fetal Medicine. WB Saunders. Philedelphia, PA. 1999. 644-5.
14. Induction of Labor. Compendium of Selected Publications. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Nunmber 10, Nov 1999, 437-482. Merck, Washington, DC 2005.
15. De Grace et al. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Oct;17(5):795-809.
16. Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term. Brit Jour Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;112(9):1284-90.
17. Permature Rupture of Membranes. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Number 1, June 1998, pgs 697-705.
18. Sahraoui W. et al. Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one week's gestation with an unfavorable cervix. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2005 Sep;34(5):454-62.
  |
Study ID Numbers: | 6H06 |
First Received: | February 17, 2006 |
Last Updated: | February 17, 2006 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00294242 |
Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
|
|