Primary Navigation for the CDC Website
CDC en Español
2003 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 2—ART Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos

This page contains figures 14–24
Section 2A | Section 2B | Section 2C
 

What are the causes of infertility among couples who use ART?

Figure 14 shows the infertility diagnoses reported among couples who had an ART procedure using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2003. Diagnoses range from one infertility factor in one partner to multiple factors in either one or both partners. However, diagnostic procedures may vary from one clinic to another, so the categorization may be inexact.

  • Tubal factor means that the woman’s fallopian tubes are blocked or damaged, making it difficult for the egg to be fertilized or for an embryo to travel to the uterus.
  • Ovulatory dysfunction means that the ovaries are not producing eggs normally. Such dysfunctions include polycystic ovary syndrome and multiple ovarian cysts.
  • Diminished ovarian reserve means that the ability of the ovary to produce eggs is reduced. Reasons include congenital, medical, or surgical causes or advanced age.
  • Endometriosis involves the presence of tissue similar to the uterine lining in abnormal locations. This condition can affect both fertilization of the egg and embryo implantation.
  • Uterine factor means a structural or functional disorder of the uterus that results in reduced fertility.
  • Male factor refers to a low sperm count or problems with sperm function that make it difficult for a sperm to fertilize an egg under normal conditions.
  • Other causes of infertility include immunological problems, chromosomal abnormalities, cancer chemotherapy, and serious illnesses.
  • Unexplained cause means that no cause of infertility was found in either the woman or the man.
  • Multiple factors, female only, means that more than one female cause was diagnosed.
  • Multiple factors, female and male, means that one or more female causes and male factor infertility were diagnosed.

Figure 14: Diagnoses Among Couples Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.

 

Figure 14: Diagnoses Among Couples Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.

 

 

 


Does the cause of infertility affect the chances of success using ART?

Figure 15 shows the percentage of live births after an ART procedure according to the causes of infertility. (See Figure 14 or the Glossary in Appendix B for an explanation of the diagnoses.) Although the national average success rate was slightly more than 28% (see Figure 5), success rates varied somewhat depending on diagnosis; however, the definitions of these diagnoses may vary from clinic to clinic. In general, couples diagnosed with tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction, endometriosis, male factor, or unexplained infertility had above-average success rates. The lowest success rate was observed for those with diminished ovarian reserve. Additionally, couples with uterine factor, “other” causes, or multiple infertility factors had below-average success rates.

Figure 15: Live Birth Rates Among Women Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Diagnosis, 2003.

 

Figure 15: Live Birth Rates Among Women Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Diagnosis, 2003.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


How many women who use ART have previously given birth?

Figure 16 shows the number of previous births among women who had an ART procedure using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2003. Most of these women (about 73%) had no previous births, although they may have had a pregnancy that resulted in a miscarriage or an induced abortion. About 20% of women using ART in 2003 reported one previous birth, and 7% reported two or more previous births. However, we do not have information about how many of these were ART births and how many were not. These data nonetheless point out that women who have previously had children can still face infertility problems.

Figure 16: Number of Previous Births Among Women Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh  Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.

 

Figure 16: Number of Previous Births Among Women Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.


Do women who have previously given birth have higher ART success rates?

Figure 17 shows the relationship between the success of an ART cycle and the history of
previous births. Previous live-born infants were conceived naturally in some cases and through ART in others. In all age groups up to age 42, women who had a previous live birth were more likely to have a successful ART procedure.

Figure 17: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and Number of Previous Live Births, 2003.

 

Figure 17: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and Number of Previous Live Births, 2003.


Is there a difference in ART success rates between women with previous miscarriages and women who have never been pregnant?

In 2003, 66,343 ART cycles were performed among women who had not previously given birth (see Figure 16). However, about 27% of those cycles were reported by women with one or more previous pregnancies that had ended in miscarriage. We do not have information on whether the previous pregnancies were the result of ART or were conceived naturally. Figure 18 shows the relationship between the success of an ART cycle and the history of previous miscarriage. In all age groups women who had a previous miscarriage had live birth rates that were comparable to the live birth rates among women who had never been pregnant. Thus, a history of unsuccessful pregnancy does not appear to be associated with reduced chances for success during ART.

Figrue 18: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and History of Miscarriage, Among Women with No Previous Births, 2003.

 

Figure 18: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and History of Miscarriage, Among Women with No Previous Births, 2003.


How many current ART users have undergone previous ART cycles?

Figure 19 presents ART cycles that used fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2003 according to whether previous ART cycles had been performed. For about 44%, one or more previous cycles were reported. (This percentage includes previous cycles using either fresh or frozen embryos.) This finding illustrates that it is not uncommon for a couple to undergo multiple ART cycles. We do not have information on when previous cycles were performed, nor do we have information on the outcomes of those previous cycles.

Figure 19: Number of Previous ART Cycles Among Women Undergoing ART in 2003 with Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos.

 

Figure 19: Number of Previous ART Cycles Among Women Undergoing ART in 2003 with Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos.


Are success rates different for women using ART for the first time and women who previously used ART but did not give birth?

Figure 20 shows the relationship between the success of ART cycles performed in 2003 using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos and a history of previous ART cycles among women with no previous births. In most age groups, success rates were lower for women who had previously undergone an unsuccessful ART cycle.

Figure 20: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and History of Previous ART Cycles, Among Women with No Previous Births, 2003.

 

Figure 20: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and History of Previous ART Cycles, Among Women with No Previous Births, 2003.


What are the success rates for women who have had both previous ART and previous births?

Figure 21 shows the relationship between the success of ART cycles performed in 2003 using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos and a history of both previous ART cycles and previous births. We do not have information on whether the previous births were the result of ART or were conceived naturally. However, among women with previous births, there was no decline in success rates if they had undergone previous ART cycles.

Taken together, Figures 20 and 21 show that having undergone previous ART cycles may be related to the success of the current ART cycle. However, it is important to consider the outcomes of previous cycles and whether the woman has given birth in the past.

Figure 21: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and History of Previous ART Cycles, Among Women with One or More Previous Births, 2003.

 

Figure 21: Live Birth Rates for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Woman's Age and History of Previous ART Cycles, Among Women with One or More Previous Births, 2003.


What were the specific types of ART performed among women who used fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2003?

For about 44% of ART procedures that used fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2003, standard IVF (in vitro fertilization) techniques were used: eggs and sperm were combined in the laboratory, the resulting embryos were cultured for 2 or more days, and one or more embryos were then transferred into the woman’s uterus through the cervix.

For more than half (56%) of ART procedures, fertilization was accomplished using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This technique involves injecting a single sperm directly into an egg; the embryos are then cultured and transferred as in standard IVF.

For a small proportion of ART procedures, unfertilized eggs and sperm (gametes) or early embryos (zygotes)  were transferred into the woman’s fallopian tubes. These procedures are known as gamete and zygote intrafallopian transfer (GIFT and ZIFT). Some women with tubal infertility are not suitable candidates for GIFT and ZIFT. GIFT and ZIFT are more invasive procedures than IVF because they involve inserting a laparoscope into a woman’s abdomen to transfer the embryos or gametes into the fallopian tubes. In contrast, IVF involves transferring embryos or gametes into a woman’s uterus through the cervix without surgery.

Figure 22: Types of ART Procedures Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.

 

Figure 22: Types of ART Procedures Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.
 


What are the success rates for different types of ART procedures?

Figure 23 shows the percentage of egg retrievals that resulted in a live birth for each type
of ART procedure started in 2003. Success rates for the two predominant types of ART, IVF without ICSI and IVF with ICSI, were similar. The success rates for cycles that used GIFT or ZIFT were much lower than for cycles that used other ART procedures. See Figures 2426 for further details on IVF procedures that used ICSI.

Figure 23: Live Births per Retrieval for Different Types of ART Procedures Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.

 

Figure 23: Live Births per Retrieval for Different Types of ART Procedures Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 2003.

 

 

 

 


Is ICSI used only for couples diagnosed with male factor infertility?

ICSI was developed to overcome problems with fertilization that sometimes occur in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility. In 2003, 50,648 ICSI cycles were performed. Although the majority of couples using ICSI had a diagnosis of male factor infertility, a sizable portion of ICSI cycles (about 47%) were performed for couples without a diagnosis of male factor infertility.

Figure 24: Use of ICSI in Fresh–Nondonor Cycles Among Couples with and Without Diagnoses of Male Factor Infertility, 2003.

 

Figure 24: Use of ICSI in Fresh–Nondonor Cycles Among Couples with and Without Diagnoses of Male Factor Infertility, 2003.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Section 1 | Section 2 | Section 3 | Section 4 | Section 5


Selected Resources

Previous ART Reports

Implementation of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992

Assisted Reproductive Technology: Embryo Laboratory

Date last reviewed: 03/27/2006
Content source: Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

rectangle border
ART label image

2003 Clinics by State

bullet Home
bullet Download Report
bullet Acknowledgements
bullet Preface
bullet Commonly Asked Questions
bullet Introduction to the 2003 National Report
bullet Section 1
bullet Section 2
bullet Section 3
bullet Section 4
bullet Section 5
bullet Introduction to Fertility Clinic Tables
bullet Sample Clinic Table
bullet How to Read a Fertility Clinic Table
bullet 2003 National Summary Report
bullet Appendix A
bullet Appendix B
bullet Appendix C
bullet Appendix C Non-Reporting Clinics
bullet Appendix D
bullet Slide Show
rectangle border

Reproductive Health related resources
bullet Reproductive Health Home
bullet Data and Statistics
bullet Publications and Products
bullet

Glossary

bullet Related Links

bullet Adolescent Reproductive Health
bullet Assisted Reproductive Technology
bullet Global Reproductive Health
bullet Maternal and Infant Health Research
bullet Refugee Reproductive Health
bullet Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
bullet Unintended Pregnancy
bullet Women's Reproductive Health

bullet Division of Reproductive Health

Contact Info
CDC/DRH
4770 Buford Hwy, NE
MS K-20
Atlanta, GA 30341-3717

Phone number
770-488-5200

bullet Contact Us

divider
  Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
Safer, Healthier People

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A
Tel: (404) 639-3311 / Public Inquiries: (404) 639-3534 / (800) 311-3435
USAGov LogoDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services