goto Indian Health Service home page  Indian Health Service:  The Federal Health Program for American Indians and Alaska Natives

 
IHS HOME ABOUT IHS SITE MAP HELP
goto Health and Human Services home page goto Health and Human Services home page

Prenatal Genetic Screening – Serum and Ultrasound

Contact Us

MCH Website Administrator

Required Plugins

These plug-ins
may be required
for the content
on this page:


Link to Adobe Acrobat Plug-in Acrobat
Link to MicroSoft Word Plug-in MS Word

IHS Plug-in Page

Use site contact
if unable to view
a particular file

Maternal Child

Maternal Child HealthPerinatologist Corner ‹ C.E.U./C.M.E. Modules

Perinatologist Corner - C.E.U/C.M.E. Modules

Prenatal Genetic Screening – Serum and Ultrasound

Sponsored by The Indian Health Service Clinical Support Center

2. Background

The risk of having a child with Down syndrome (trisomy-21) ExitDisclaimer increases with increasing maternal age, but at present, the majority of Down syndrome (DS) children are born to younger women, as they are who have the majority of the babies (see more on demographics below). Various tables are available for calculating the risks of fetal aneuploidy by maternal age. (Aneuploidy refers to an unbalanced chromosome make-up, e.g., an extra chromosome 21, resulting in the Down syndrome phenotype.) Roughly, the risk of DS at age 35 is approximately 1 in 270, which increases to about 1 in 100 at age 40, and to almost 1 in 12 at age 45. When counseling the patient, remember, “is the glass half empty or is it half full?” A 40 year old woman still has 99 out of 100 chances that her child will not be affected!

Maternal serum screening for fetal neural tube defects with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been available since the late 1970’s, ExitDisclaimer and screening for fetal trisomies, initially with decreased AFP, and then with the combined “triple test” (AFP, serum human chorionic gonadotrophin [bHCG], and unconjugated estriol [uE3]) since the early and late 1980’s respectively. Currently, the “quad screen”, adding dimeric inhibin-A as a fourth analyte, has shown advantages. At the present time it has become standard of care to offer such screening in the second trimester, and about 70% of women currently opt for testing. Counseling the pregnant woman about whether multiple marker screening (MMS) is something she wants, and then what to do if her screen returns with an abnormal result, have become components of prenatal care. The process can be time-consuming, at times confusing, and often very anxiety producing.

 

1. Goal, Objectives ‹ Previous | Next › 3. Screening versus Diagnosis

up arrow Return to top of page

This file last modified: Tuesday November 6, 2007  10:43 AM