U.S. Office of Personnel Management - Ensuring the Federal Government has an effective civilian workforce
Presidents Pay Agent
The President's Pay AgentCost of Locality PaymentsEstimated Cost of Locality PaymentsThe cost of locality payments is the sum of all individual locality payments during a calendar year, offset by special rates and geographic adjustments for law enforcement officers (LEOs). This amount is estimated using OPM records of all Federal employees with duty stations within the continental United States (CONUS) as of March 2003 and covered by the General Schedule or other pay plan to which locality pay has been extended, together with the percentage locality payments from Table 8. The estimate assumes that the average number and distribution of employees (by locality, grade, and step) in CONUS in 2005 will not differ from the number and distribution in March 2003. The estimate includes about $73 million attributable to adding locations to locality pay areas but does not include increases in premium pay costs or Government contributions for retirement, life insurance, or other employee benefits that may be attributed to locality payments. Cost estimates are derived as follows. First, both the "scheduled annual rate of pay," as defined in 5 CFR531.602, and the annual rate inclusive of special rates and LEO geographic adjustments are determined for each employee. (These rates are adjusted to include an assumed 1.5 percent across-the-board increase in 2004 and the 2.5 percent across-the-board increase that would go into effect in 2005 under current law.) Both annual rates are converted to expected annual earnings by multiplying each by an appropriate work schedule factor. [1] The "gross locality payment" is computed for each employee by multiplying expected annual earnings from the scheduled annual rate by the locality payment percentage for the employee's locality pay area. The sum of these gross locality payments is the cost of locality pay before offset by special rates and LEO geographic adjustments. Second, for each employee,
the gross locality payment is compared to the amount by which expected
annual earnings from the annual rate inclusive of special rates and LEO
geographic adjustments exceeds the expected annual earnings from the scheduled
annual rate. This second amount is the "cost" of any special rate
or LEO geographic adjustment. If the gross locality payment is
less than or equal to the cost of any special rate or LEO geographic adjustment,
the net locality payment is set to zero. In this case, the locality
payment is completely offset. If the gross locality payment is
greater than the cost of any special rate or LEO adjustment, the net locality
payment is equal to the gross locality payment minus the cost of any special
rate or LEO geographic adjustment. In this case, the locality payment
is at most partially offset. If the scheduled annual rate is the
same as the annual rate inclusive of special rates and LEO geographic
adjustments (i.e., the cost of any special rate or LEO geographic adjustment
is zero), then there is no offset and the net locality payment equals
the gross locality payment. The sum of the net locality payments
so derived is the estimated cost of local comparability payments. Estimated Cost of Locality Payments in 2005 Table 10, below, compares the cost of 2004 locality rates to those that would be authorized in 2005 under 5 U.S.C. 5304(a)(3)(I), as identified in Table 8. For the purpose of this cost estimate, we have assumed that there will be a 1.5 percent across-the-board increase in January 2004 and that the locality rates contained in the President's Alternative Plan submitted on August 27, 2003 will be in effect in 2004. If Congress provides a 4.1 percent overall increase in 2004 and if that amount is allocated as recommended by the Federal Salary Council in Attachment 3 of Appendix I of this report, the estimated net cost of new locality payments in 2005 would be $595 million less than shown in the table. The "2004 Baseline" cost would be the cost of locality pay in 2005 if the assumed 2004 locality rates were not increased, i.e., the percentage locality payments in 2005 on top of base pay increased by the 1.5 percent across-the-board adjustment in January 2004 and the 2.5 percent adjustment in January 2005. The "100 Percent of Target in 2005" columns show what the total locality payments would be and the net increase in 2005. The "2005 Increase" column shows the 2005 total payment minus the 2004 baseline -- i.e., the increase in locality pay in 2005 attributable to higher locality pay rates. Based on the assumptions outlined above, we estimate the total cost of the net pay increases attributable to the locality rates that otherwise would be required by current law to be about $8.0 billion on an annual basis. This amount does not include the cost of benefits or the cost of the 2.5 percent increase in rates of basic pay that would take effect in January 2005 under current law. This cost estimate excludes 1,223 records of white-collar workers, which were unusable because of errors. Many of these employees may receive locality pay. Including these records would add about $7.5 million to the net cost of locality payments. The cost estimate covers only the General Schedule and employees in pay plans who receive locality pay by action of the Pay Agent. It excludes the cost of pay raises for employees under other pay systems that may be linked in some fashion to locality pay increases. These other pay systems include the Federal Wage System for blue-collar workers, under which raises often are capped based on the increase in locality rates for white-collar workers; pay raises for employees of the Federal Aviation Administration and other agencies which have independent authority to set pay; and pay raises for employees covered by various demonstration projects. Table 10. Cost of Local Comparability Payments in 2005 (in millions of dollars)
*LEO geographic adjustments are pay adjustments to which law enforcement officers are entitled in certain metropolitan areas. [1] The work schedule factor equals 1 for full-time employees and one of several values less than 1 for the several categories of non-full-time employees. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Office of Personnel Management 1900 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20415 | (202) 606-1800 | TTY (202) 606-2532