12.900 LANGUAGE GRANT PROGRAM |
FEDERAL AGENCY |
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE |
AUTHORIZATION |
Public Law 95-224. |
OBJECTIVES |
To foster foreign language training to Americans. |
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE |
Project Grants. |
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS |
None. |
Applicant Eligibility |
Investigations must be an employee of a U.S. college, university or nonprofit institution as related to language. |
Beneficiary Eligibility |
Private, public educational institutions and other private, public nonprofit organizations which are operated primarily for language and are not organized primarily for profit. |
Credentials/Documentation |
Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB Circular Nos. A-21, A-87, A-88, A-122 and Subpart 31.2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation applicable to commercial firms and those nonprofits exempted from OMB Circular No. A-122. The administrative requirements of OMB Circular Nos. A-102, A-110, and A-133 apply. |
Preapplication Coordination |
None. This program is excluded from coverage under E.O. 12372. |
Application Procedure |
All eligible private, public educational institutions and other private, public nonprofit organizations may submit proposals in response to the relevant agency announcement. |
Award Procedure |
Award decisions will be based on a competitive selection of proposals resulting from a RUA review. If selected for award, the proposal is incorporated into a grant document and the applicant agrees to perform the research described therein. |
Deadlines |
December 15 is the deadline for submission of proposals. |
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time |
Awards may be made at any time throughout the year for which funding is authorized. |
Appeals |
None. |
Renewals |
Reapplication with a new proposal. |
Formula and Matching Requirements |
None. |
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance |
Funding will reflect the period of performance. |
Reports |
Interim and final reports are required. |
Audits |
In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A- 133 (Revised, June 27, 2003), "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations," nonfederal entities that expend financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Nonfederal entities that expend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133. |
Records |
Each grantee will maintain accounting records which will permit determination that the funds were used for the grant purpose. |
Account Identification |
97-0100-0-1-051. |
Obligations |
FY 07 not reported; FY 08 est not reported; and FY 09 est not reported. Note: No current information provided by Agency. |
Range and Average of Financial Assistance |
$5,000 to $500,000. |
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS |
Provided support which led to the documentation of low density languages; the development of foreign language reference works, and the improved research in training methods and computer assisted instruction technologies. |
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE |
None. |
Regional or Local Office |
Not applicable. |
Headquarters Office |
Chief, Language Training, Department of Defense, National Security Agency, ATTN: E41, Fort George Meade, MD 20755-6000. Telephone: (410) 859-6087. Use the same number for FTS. |
Web Site Address |
http://www.darpa.mil/cmo |
RELATED PROGRAMS |
None. |
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS |
1. CALICO; 2. development of a hypermedia area studies module; 3. research on student learning center to maintain less commonly taught languages; 4. ALICE prototype natural language processing environment; and 5. monograph defining priorities for listening comprehension research. |
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS |
1. Overall language, technical or socio-economic merits; 2. potential contributions of the effort to the agency's specific mission; 3. the offerer's capabilities, related experience, facilities, techniques or unique combinations of these, which are integral factors for achieving the proposal objectives; 4. the qualifications, capabilities and experience of the proposal principal investigator, team leader or key personal who are critical in achieving the proposal objectives; 5. realism of the proposed cost and availability of funds; and 6. potential contributions of the effort to the American public. |
General Services Administration Office of Chief Acquisition Officer Regulatory and Federal Assistance Division (VIR) |