Skip Navigation
 
Home | About CDC | Media Relations | A-Z Index | Contact Us
   
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
CDC en Español 
Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Legal Status of EPT - Virginia

potentially allowable EPT is possible

I. Statutes/regs on health care providers’ authority to prescribe for STDs to a patient’s partner(s) w/out prior evaluation (Explanation)

 

II. Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)  
III. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) minus symbol “Women’s Health Nurse Practitioners who treat male [partners] for STDs must have authorization for and have received specific training in such practice, as documented in the written protocol between the nurse practitioner and the supervising physician. In addition, any prescription written for STDs shall be issued for a medicinal therapeutic purpose to a person with whom the practitioner has a bona fide practitioner-patient relationship….”
[Link to Boards of Nursing and Medicine Guidance Document]
IV. Legislative bills or prospective regulations concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)  
V. Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices (including EPT) (Explanation) plus sign Regulations incorporate:
APHA’s CCD Manual, 27th edition, 2000, "Methods of Control" section, except to the extent that the recommendations therein are outdated, inappropriate, inadequate, or otherwise inapplicable. The health board and commissioner reserve the right to use any legal means to control any disease which is a threat to the public health.
12 Va. Admin. Code § 5-90-100
VI. Prescription requirements (Explanation) minus symbol The prescription shall contain the patient’s name and address. Va. Code Ann.
§ 54.1-3408.01(A)
VII. Assessment of EPT’s legal status with brief comments (Explanation)

potentially allowable EPT is possible

The Board of Nursing and Medicine opinion requires a “bona fide practitioner-patient relationship,” although this term is only defined in statutes relating to the regulation of controlled substances under Va. Code Ann. § 54.1-3303(A). Absent an express statutory preclusion, the health board and commissioner may exercise their authority to proffer EPT as a potential measure to treat diseases (like STDs) that pose a threat to the public’s health.

 

Status as of August 16, 2006
Legend:  
plus sign supports the use of EPT permissible EPT is permissible
minus symbol negatively affects the use of EPT potentially allowable EPT is potentially allowable
  prohibited EPT is prohibited

Select a state from the map or the list.

District of Columbia Maryland Delaware New Jersey Connecticut Massachusetts Rhode Island Pennsylvania New York Maine New Hampshire Vermont New Hampshire Vermont West Virginia Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Ohio Indiana Michigan Wisconsin Illinois Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Mississippi Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma Texas Puerto Rico Hawaii Alaska Montana Wyoming Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Idaho Nevada California Oregon Washington
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Colombia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Summary Totals

Exception: EPT is permissible in Baltimore, Maryland.

Page last modified: December 13, 2007
Page last reviewed: December 13, 2007

Content Source: Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention