|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
Table 1. |
Study Population Characteristics, Missouri |
3 |
|
|
|
Table 2. |
Missouri Input Arrests |
3 |
|
|
|
Table 3. |
License Action by Input Arrest Type, Missouri |
3 |
|
|
|
Table 4. |
Subsequent Violations-Suspension versus No Suspension, Missouri |
3 |
|
|
|
Table 5. |
Study Population Characteristics, Pennsylvania |
4 |
|
|
|
Table 6. |
Four Driver's License Action Groups Following Input Arrest, Pennsylvania |
4 |
|
|
|
Table 7. |
Distribution of Subsequent Violations, Crashes, and License Actions, Pennsylvania |
4 |
|
|
|
Table 8. |
Associations Between Age or Gender or Driver's License Action Group with a Subsequent Violation, Pennsylvania |
4 |
|
|
|
Table 9. |
Associations Between Age or Gender or Driver's License Action Group with a Subsequent Crash, Pennsylvania |
4 |
|
|
|
Table 10. |
Proportional Hazards Model: Age or Gender of Driver's License Action Group as Predictors of Incidence of 1st Subsequent Violation, Pennsylvania |
5 |
|
|
|
Table 11. |
Proportional Hazards Model: Age or Gender of Driver's License Action Group as Predictors of Incidence of 1st Subsequent Crash, Pennsylvania |
5 |
|
|
|