HEALTH CONSULTATION
EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION
POCATELLO, BANNOCK AND POWER COUNTIES, IDAHO
Based on a review of available data and discussions with local, state, tribal, and federal environmental and health officials, ATSDR concludes the following:
Some population living near the phosphate plants may have also been exposed between 1977-1985 to levels of sulfur dioxide above levels of health concern. This population's exposures to PM, as well as sulfur dioxide, likely increased their risk for adverse respiratory health effects.
Between 1994 and 1998, long-term average ambient air concentrations of PM10 throughout Chubbuck and Pocatello were notably lower than in previous years, thus reducing health risks associated with chronic exposures. However, the recent severe inversions in the Portneuf Valley clearly show that potentially unhealthy acute exposures to PM can still occur and probably will occur in the future unless air emissions from FMC and Simplot and other major sources are reduced.
Air monitoring devices need to be installed on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation at locations north of Interstate 86 to characterize potential exposures and fill this important data gap.
ATSDR recommends the following actions to ensure that residents of Chubbuck, Pocatello, and the Fort Hall Indian Reservation are not exposed to unhealthy levels of air pollution that may originate from FMC, Simplot, or other emissions sources in the EMF study area:
Note: IDEQ currently characterizes air quality in Pocatello and Chubbuck on a daily basis using an Air Quality Index (AQI). The AQI ranges from zero (no pollution) to five hundred (large amounts of pollution). This index is updated on a daily basis and can be accessed through the hotline number at 208-236-6173 or on the Web at http://www.state.id.us/deq/ro_p/pro_air/aqi_report_pro.shtml. If further information is requested, residents should contact IDEQ at 208-236-6160.
Knowing that FMC and Simplot continue to emit toxic chemicals to the air, though in lower quantities than have been emitted in the past, ATSDR is committed to reviewing ambient air monitoring data, emissions monitoring data, and health outcome data as they become available for the EMF study area. The Public Health Action Plan (Section VII) provides additional information on future site-related activities.
VII. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION PLAN
The Public Health Action Plan (PHAP) for this health consultation describes the actions taken or planned for the EMF site. The purpose of the PHAP is to ensure that this health consultation not only identifies public health hazards, but provides a plan of action designed to mitigate and prevent adverse human health effects resulting from future exposure to hazardous substances in the environment. ATSDR is committed to following up on this plan to ensure that it is implemented. As needed, ATSDR will revise this PHAP by identifying the actions completed and those in progress. The public health actions taken or to be implemented are as follows:
Actions Completed
Action Planned
ATSDR will reevaluate and expand the Public Health Action Plan (PHAP) when needed. New environmental, toxicological, health outcome data, or the results of implementing the above proposed actions may warrant additional actions at this site.
Gregory V. Ulirsch
Technical Project Officer/Environmental Health Scientist
Superfund Site Assessment Branch
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation, ATSDR
Debra Gable
Technical Project Officer
Superfund Site Assessment Branch
Division of Health Assessment and Consultation, ATSDR
Technical Consultation provided to ATSDR by:
John Wilhelmi
Eastern Research Group
Lexington, MA
ARS, 1998. Ambient air monitoring data provided by Air Resource Specialists. December, 1998.
ATSDR, 1990. Preliminary Public Health Assessment for the Eastern Michaud Flats Contamination Site. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1990.
ATSDR, 1992a. Toxicological Profile for Barium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. July, 1992.
ATSDR, 1992b. Toxicological Profile for Vanadium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. July, 1992.
ATSDR, 1995. Fort Hall Air Emissions Study: Fort Hall Indian Reservation. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. November, 1995.
ATSDR, 1996. Written correspondence from Barry Johnson (ATSDR) to Tony Galloway (Sho-Ban Tribes). August, 1996.
ATSDR, 1997a. Site Review and Up-Date for Eastern Michaud Flats Contamination, Pocatello, Bannock County, Idaho. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. March 1997.
ATSDR, 1997b. Toxicological Profile for Cyanide. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September, 1997.
ATSDR, 1998a. Health Consultation: Groundwater Contamination at the Eastern Michaud Flats Contamination. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. October, 1998.
ATSDR, 1998b. Health Consultation: Surface Soil Contamination at the Eastern Michaud Flats Contamination. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. October, 1998.
ATSDR, 1998c. Health Consultation: Surface Water and Sediment Contamination at the Eastern Michaud Flats Contamination. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. October, 1998.
ATSDR, 1998d. Toxicological Profile for Sulfur Dioxide. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. December, 1998.
ATSDR, 1999a. Toxicological Profile for Aluminum. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. July, 1999.
ATSDR, 1999b. Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. July, 1999.
ATSDR, 2000a. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September, 2000.
ATSDR, 2000b. Toxicological Profile for Beryllium. Draft for Public Comment. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September, 2000.
ATSDR, 2000c. Toxicological Profile for Chromium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September, 2000.
ATSDR, 2000d. Toxicological Profile for Manganese. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September, 2000.
Bechtel, 1993. Air Dispersion Modeling for Monitoring Site Locations. Bechtel Environmental, Inc. January, 1993.
Bechtel, 1995. Remedial Investigation Report for the Eastern Michaud Flats Site. Part III: Air Quality Characterization Air Monitoring Report, Volume I. Bechtel Environmental, Inc. September, 1995.
Bechtel, 1996. Remedial Investigation Report for the Eastern Michaud Flats Site. Part I: Executive Summary. Bechtel Environmental, Inc. August, 1996.
Bechtel, 1998. RCRA Pond Emission Study. Bechtel Environmental, Inc. October, 1998.
Dockery et al., 1993. Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG, Speizer FE. An Association Between Air Pollution and Mortality in Six U.S. Cities. The New England Journal of Medicine 329(24):1753-1759. December, 1993.
FMC, 1999a. OP-FTIR Air Monitoring System Quarterly Report: First Quarter 1999. FMC Phosphorous Chemicals Division. 1999.
FMC, 1999b. OP-FTIR Air Monitoring System Quarterly Report: Second Quarter 1999. FMC Phosphorous Chemicals Division. 1999.
FMC, 1999c. OP-FTIR Air Monitoring System Quarterly Report: Third Quarter 1999. FMC Phosphorous Chemicals Division. 1999.
FMC, 1999d. OP-FTIR Air Monitoring System Quarterly Report: Fourth Quarter 1999. FMC Phosphorous Chemicals Division. 1999.
FMC, 2000. OP-FTIR Air Monitoring System Quarterly Report: First Quarter 2000. FMC Phosphorous Chemicals Division. 1999.
FR, 1999. Federal Rulemaking for the FMC Facility in the Fort Hall PM-10 Nonattainment Area; Proposed Rule. Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 29. February, 1999.
Godleski, et al., 2000. Mechanisms of Morbidity and Mortality from Exposure to Ambient Air Particles. Health Effects Institute. February, 2000.
Hartman, 1999. Written correspondence from Rob Hartman (FMC) to John Wilhelmi (Eastern Research Group, Inc.). March, 1999.
IDEQ, 1991. Power/Bannock Counties PM-10 Receptor Modeling: Background and Preliminary Work. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality. January. 1991.
IDEQ, 1998a. Idaho Environment 1998. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality. 1998.
IDEQ, 1998b. CMB Receptor Modeling for the Special Winter Study in Pocatello, Idaho. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality. September. 1998.
IDEQ, 1999a. Portneuf Valley Particulate Matter (PM10) Air Quality Improvement Plan. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality. March, 1999.
IDEQ, 1999b. Database of results from chemical analyses of particulate filters. Provided by Diane Riley, Idaho Division of Environmental Quality. May, 1999.
IDEQ, 1999c. Written correspondence from Tom Edwards (IDEQ) to John Wilhelmi (Eastern Research Group). February, 1999.
IDEQ, 1999d. Written correspondence from Tom Edwards (IDEQ) to Greg Ulirsch (ATSDR). December, 1999.
IDEQ, 2000a. Release of preliminary ambient air monitoring data. Personal communication between Tom Edwards (IDEQ) and John Wilhelmi (Eastern Research Group). January, 2000.
IDEQ, 2000b. CMB Analysis for PM10 Scenario for 1999, Pocatello, Idaho. 2000.
IDH, 1975. Implementation Plan for the Control of Air Pollution in the State of Idaho. Idaho Department of Health/Idaho Air Pollution Control Commission. February, 1975.
IDHW, 1988. Air Quality Annual Report - 1987. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. July, 1988.
IDHW, 1991. Power/Bannock Counties PM-10 Receptor Modeling: Background and Preliminary Work. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. January, 1991.
Jones et al., 1964. Environmental and Clinical Aspects of Bulk Wheat Fumigation with Aluminum Phosphide. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 25: 375-379. 1964.
Krewski, et al., 2000. Particle Epidemiology Reanalysis Project. Health Effects Institute. July, 2000.
Neill, 1980. Airborne Particulate Size Analysis in the Pocatello Area. D.T. Neill, Idaho State University Energy Experiment Station. May, 1980.
NIOSH, 1994. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. June, 1994.
OMNI, 1991a. Dispersion Modeling Protocol for the Pocatello Nonattainment Area. OMNI Environmental Services, Inc. September, 1991.
OMNI, 1991b. Source Apportionment Analysis of the Pocatello Nonattainment Area. OMNI Environmental Services, Inc. October, 1991.
Pope et al., 1995. Pope CA, Thun MJ. Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE, Heath CW. Particulate Air Pollution as a Predictor of Mortality in a Prospective Study of U.S. Adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 151:669-674.
Pope, C.A., 2000. Epidemiology of Fine Particle Air Pollution and Human Health: Biological Mechanisms and Who's at Risk? Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 (Supplement 4): 713-723.
Samet, et al., 2000. The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study Part II: Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution in the United States. Health Effects Institute. June, 2000.
Schwartz, J., 1999. Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions for Heart Disease in Eight U.S. Counties. Epidemiology. 10(1): 17-22.
Severson, 1999. Personal communication between Jim Severson (FMC) and Debra Gable (ATSDR). March, 1999.
Sho-ban, 1989. Air Quality Monitoring Plan and Particulate Exposure Assessment. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Air Quality Program. April, 1989.
Sho-Ban, 1996. Written correspondence from the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes to Barry Johnson (ATSDR). August, 1996.
TRC, 1993. Power-Bannock Counties PM10 SIP Dispersion Modeling Study. TRC Environmental Corporation. March, 1993.
USEPA, 1992. Pocatello PM10 Saturation Study. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Services Division. April, 1992.
USEPA, 1996. Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment. EPA/600/P-95/001aF. April, 1996.
USEPA, 1997. Fact Sheet: EPA's Revised Particulate Matter Standards. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. July, 1997.
USEPA, 1998. Air quality monitoring data downloaded from the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December, 1998.
USEPA, 1999a. Technical Support Document; Federal Implementation Plan for the FMC Facility in the Fort Hall PM-10 Nonattainment Area. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10. January, 1999.
USEPA, 1999b. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): On-Line Database. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment. June, 1999.
USEPA, 1999c. Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) State Files Documentation for RY 1997. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. March 22, 1999.
USEPA, 1999d. Fort Hall Source Apportionment Study: Final Report. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 600/R-99/103. September, 1999.
Willis, Ellenson, and Conner, 2000. Monitoring and source apportionment of particulate matter near a large phosphorus production facility. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, submitted. 2000.
FIGURES
Figure 1. General Study Area for EMF Health Consultation
Figure 3. Monitoring Locations
Figure 4. Area of Impact of PM10 and 2.5 Exposures in EMF Study Area (1975-1993)
Figure 5. The Fort Hall PM10 Nonattainment Area and the Portneuf Valley PM10 Nonattainment Area
TABLES
Table 1. 1997 and 1998 TRI Air Emissions Data for FMC and Simplot
Facility | Pollutant | Pounds Released to the Air, by Reporting Year | |
1997 | 1998 | ||
Emissions Data Reported by FMC |
Antimony compounds | 130 | 130 |
Arsenic compounds | 27 | 30 | |
Barium compounds | 1,656 | 1,000 | |
Cadmium compounds | 3,631 | 2,520 | |
Chromium compounds | 2,505 | 2,350 | |
Copper compounds | 84 | 80 | |
Cyanide compounds | 13,152 | 232,136 | |
Hydrogen fluoride | 5,311 | Not reported | |
Manganese compounds | 14 | 10 | |
Nickel compounds | 284 | 270 | |
Phosphine | 16,992 | 35,170 | |
Phosphorous (yellow or white) | 0 | 0 | |
Selenium compounds | 1,975 | 1,940 | |
Zinc compounds | 1,657 | 1,130 | |
Emissions Data Reported by Simplot |
Ammonia | 121,000 | 425,000 |
Hydrogen fluoride | 33,000 | 36,000 | |
Methanol | Not reported | 15,000 | |
Nitrate compounds | 0 | 0 | |
Nitric acid | 0 | 0 | |
Phosphoric acid | 0 | 0 | |
Sulfuric acid aerosols | 39,830 | 67,850 |
Notes: The table only lists emissions to the air. As required
by TRI, the facilities also reported releases of the listed compounds to other
media (e.g., surface water and soils).
TRI data are self-reported, and the accuracy of the TRI data
for these two facilities is not known.
The TRI regulations require facilities to disclose releases
of a wide range of hazardous air pollutants, but not for all toxic contaminants.
Therefore, the data in this table should not be viewed as a comprehensive emissions
inventory.
Source of information: USEPA 1999c.
Table 2. PM10 Emissions Data for the Fort Hall Nonattainment
Area and the Portneuf Valley Nonattainment Area
Sources in the Fort Hall PM10 Nonattainment Area (USEPA 1999a) | |
Source Name |
Estimated PM10 Emissions (tons per year) |
FMC | 727 |
Paved Roads | 571 |
Agricultural Windblown Dust | 310 |
All Other Sources | 198 |
Sources in the Portneuf Valley Nonattainment area (IDEQ 1999a) | |
Source Name |
Estimated PM10 Emissions (tons per year) |
Unpaved Roads | 1,230 |
Windblown Dust (Agricultural) | 894 |
Windblown Dust (non-Agricultural) | 492 |
Paved Roads | 419 |
Agricultural Tilling | 376 |
Fires | 363 |
Residential Heating | 237 |
Residential and Commercial Construction | 175 |
Road Construction | 142 |
Simplot | 135 |
All Other Sources | 362 |
Notes: The Fort Hall Nonattainment Area is located in the southernmost
portion of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation and does not include the town of
Fort Hall. Approximately 500 people live within the Fort Hall Nonattainment
Area (USEPA 1999a).
The Portneuf Valley Nonattainment Area spans approximately 100
square miles and includes the cities of Chubbuck and Pocatello (IDEQ 1999a).
Roughly 75,000 people live within this nonattainment area (USEPA 1999a).
The emissions data in this table are estimates and might understate
or overstate actual emissions levels.
Table 3. Overview of Monitoring Studies of Metals and
Other Inorganics
Elements with at least one ambient air concentration higher than corresponding health-based comparison values (further evaluation of these elements is presented in the "Public Health Implications" section of this report): | ||
Aluminum Arsenic Barium |
Beryllium Cadmium Chromium |
Manganese Vanadium |
Elements with all measured concentrations lower than corresponding health-based comparison values (these elements are not evaluated further in the report): | ||
Antimony Chlorine Cobalt Copper Iron Lead |
Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver |
Strontium Thallium Tin Titanium Zinc |
Elements detected in the EMF study area, but for which ATSDR and EPA have not developed health-based comparison values (a brief evaluation of these elements is presented in the "Public Health Implications" section of this report): | ||
Bromine Calcium Carbon Cesium Gallium Germanium* Gold* Indium* |
Iodine Lanthanum Magnesium Palladium* Phosphorous Potassium Rhodium Rubidium |
Scandium Silicon Sodium Sulfur Tellurium Tungsten Uranium Yttrium Zirconium |
Notes: Elements in this table refer to those that were measured
by x-ray fluorescence, which includes some elements (like bromine) that are
typically not categorized as metals.
Refer to Appendices A.2, A.3, and A.9 for a detailed review
of the ambient air monitoring data that led to the above classifications.
Many of the elements listed above are potentially radionuclides.
As explained earlier, this health consultation does not evaluate public health
hazards for exposures to radionuclides. A future ATSDR health consultation will
address this topic.
* denotes elements that were reported as detected by air monitoring
studies, but the measurement uncertainty exceeded the actual concentration.
As a result, it is not certain whether these elements are present in the air
in the vicinity of the EMF site. Therefore, these elements are not discussed
further in the "Public Health Implications" section of this health consultation.
Next Section Table of Contents