Peer
review is one of the hallmarks of the NIH funding process. Applications
are evaluated initially by review groups composed of extramural
research scientists to rate the scientific and technical
merit of the proposed research. This takes place either
at CSR or at the Institute (NHLBI).
The second level of peer review is carried out by the NHLBI
Advisory Council. The Council is composed of scientists
from the extramural research community and public representatives.
Its purpose is to ensure that NHLBI receives advice from
a cross-section of the US population in the process of
its deliberation and decisions.
The review process can sometimes seem secretive but this
section is designed to help you better understand the process
and answer the following questions:
- What happens to my grant after submission?
- Who will review my application and when?
- Did the reviewers like my application?
- What is a summary statement and what does it mean?
- What
if I don’t agree with the review?
|
