Sherry Gomes
October 15, 2002


I am writing to express my opposition to the proposals concerning audible traffic signals and detectable warnings. I am blind, and I am a competent traveler, either with a white cane or with my Guide Dog. I do not believe that every intersection needs to have an audible traffic signal. I am completely able to cross streets, whether they be lightly traveled or extremely busy. I find the added noise caused by the audible signals add confusion in a situation where the traffic is heavy and constant.

I am even more opposed to detectable warnings. I was born with Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. my right knee is fused, and I have joint replacements in my left knee and both hips. Sometimes, the slightest change in the elevation or texture of a sidewalk or road can cause me to stumble or lose my balance and fall. Those who want detectable warnings to help them stop for edges, platforms or to cross a street are not considering the needs of people in wheel chairs or who have difficulty walking. If a blind person uses the white cane or a dog guide properly, there should be no need for these detectable warnings.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
Sherry Gomes
Instructor, Seattle Lighthouse Education and Training

 

left arrow index    left arrow previous comment   bullet   next comment right arrow