|
Home > Electronic Reading Room > Document Collections > Enforcement Documents > Significant Enforcement
Actions > Reactor
Licensees
> G
Escalated Enforcement Actions Issued
to Reactor Licensees - G
A | B
| C | D |
E | F | G
| H | I |
J | K | L
| M | N |
O | P | Q
| R | S |
T | U | V
| W | X |
Y | Z
Ginna - Docket No. 050-00244
NRC Action Number(s) and
Facility Name |
Action Type
(Severity) &
Civil Penalty
(if any) |
Date
Issued |
Description |
EA-04-003
Ginna |
NOV
(SL III) |
03/30/2004 |
On March 30, 2004, a Notice of Violation was issued for a Severity
Level III violation involving the willful failure to follow procedures
by a manager when he manipulated two valves during a plant cooldown
without authorization as required by procedure. |
EA-02-141
Ginna |
NOV
(White) |
10/04/2002 |
On October 4, 2002, a Notice of Violation was issued for a violation
associated with a White SDP finding involving the alert and notification
system (ANS). The violation cited failures involving the ANS that
could have affected the ability to provide early notification to the
public. |
EA-97-339
Ginna |
NOVCP
(SL III)
$ 55,000 |
08/15/1997 |
Failure to protect against a land vehicle bomb. |
EA-96-282
Ginna |
NOVCP
(SL III)
$100,000 |
12/13/1996 |
The action was based on an inspection which identified two violations
involving the failure to adequately validate design inputs for the
residual heat removal system motor-operated core deluge valves, as
well as the failure to adequately correct this condition following
its identification. |
Grand Gulf 1 - Docket
No. 050-00416
NRC Action Number(s) and
Facility Name |
Action Type
(Severity) &
Civil Penalty
(if any) |
Date
Issued |
Description |
EA-99-305
Grand Gulf 1 |
NOV
(SL III) |
02/22/2000 |
On February 22, 2000, a Notice of Violation was issued for a Severity
Level III problem based on (1) failure to comply with the technical
specification for operating the emergency diesel generator; (2) failure
to establish adequate alarm response instructions; (3) failure to
review a work package, and (4) failure to initiate condition reports
for nonconformances. |
|
