Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Primer Contents
En español
 
Preface
About the Primer
 
Principles & Techniques
 
Why Evaluate?
Types of Evaluation
Evaluation Design
Measure of Effectiveness
Barriers to Evaluation
 
Evaluation & Research
 
Designing and Testing
Review and Pretesting
Pretest Methods
Print Materials
Sample Survey
Pretest Results
Using Pretest Results
Special Populations
Risk Message Checklist
 
Outcomes & Impacts
 
Assessment Questions
Evaluation Options
Midcourse Reviews
Have We Succeeded?
Evaluation Case Example
Evaluation Action Plan
Effective Program
 
Selected References
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Methyl Parathion
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Evaluation Primer on Health Risk Communication Programs

Sample Focus Group Case Study


Four Focus Groups among Women on Their Reactions to Two Contraceptive Efficacy Tables for Uniform Contraceptive Labeling

Background

In keeping with the goal of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Exit ATSDR to develop uniform contraceptive labeling, focus groups were conducted to determine a presentation format most useful to the consumer for contraceptive pregnancy rates. The focus group study obtained consumer reactions to several model contraceptive efficacy tables and graphs. Using findings from the study, the Center for Devices and Radiological HealthExit ATSDR developed for further testing two prototype, composite tables with the characteristics the focus group participants favored for uniform contraceptive labeling.

Study Purpose

To utilize focus groups to garner reactions (perceptions, opinions, beliefs, and attitudes) and preferences from women about the format and content of the two different model contraceptive efficacy tables.

Participant Characteristics

The single and married premenopausal women participating in the study were currently using or considering using a birth control method; had not earned a bachelor's degree or above; had no more than two health science or mathematics classes beyond the high school level; and had not participated in a focus group in the past 12 months.

Recruitment Method

Women who had previously expressed interest in participating in focus groups were recruited by phone.

Sample Questions from the Moderator's Guide

  1. What do you know about pregnancy rates?
  2. Where have you seen (or heard) information telling about pregnancy rates for various birth control methods?
  3. Has this information about pregnancy rates been useful to you in deciding on a particular birth control method?
  4. After showing each table:
    1. What does this table tell you?
    2. How easy to understand is this table?
    3. What information here is new to you?
    4. What did you especially like about this table?
    5. What did you dislike about this table?
    6. How useful is this information to you?
    7. What might you change, delete, or add to this table?
  5. How would you describe how well these tables help you understand how effective your birth control method is compared to other birth control methods?
  6. Is there any other format you would suggest?
  7. Is there any other information you would like to see in these tables?
  8. Is there anything else you want to say about the tables you've seen today?

Major Findings

Participants were equally divided between their preference for each of the two tables. Although they did not clearly demonstrate an overwhelming preference for one table over the other, most participants found that the tables met the goal of helping them to understand how effective their birth control method was in comparison to other methods.

[Top of Page]