NIST Polymers Division Banner NIST Polymers Division Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory National Institutes of Standards and technology
NIST Polymers Division logo Side bar NIST Polymers characterization group logo NIST Polymers Electronics group logo NIST Polymers Biomaterials group logo NIST Polymers Multiphase group logo NIST Polymers Processing group logo NIST Polymers Combi group logo Side bar
 Our Publication:
 Group:

 Year:


 
 
button HOME
button Machine Readable Travel Documents
button Ballistic Resistance of Polymeric Materials
    button Ballistic Resistance Testing
button Characterization of Chain Branching in Polymeric Materials
  button Developing an Uncertainty Budget for Polymer MALDI-TOF MS
  button MassSpectator
  button International Interlaboratory Comparison of Mixtures of Polystyrenes with Different End Groups
  button Polyolefin Mass Spectrometry
    button SRM 1476a – Polyethylene Branch Standard
 

line
line  
 

International Interlaboratory Comparison of Mixtures of Polystyrenes with Different End Groups

 

Introduction

line
We conduct interlaboratory comparisons as measures of the current practice in a specific area of polymer mass spectrometry. This enables us to gauge the needs of the community for standard methods and materials, to begin a dialog on these needs, and to steer our own research. This interlaboratory comparison, on mixtures of of two polystyrenes with different end groups, is of particular interest to industry where understanding and controlling the chemistry of reactive pre-polymers in a major concern.
 

Approach

line
Five gravimetric mixtures of two polystyrenes with matched molecular mass distributions but with different end groups, -H and –OH, were created. The test for the participants was, without knowing the gravimetric values, to determine the mass fraction of each polymer in each mixture. Challenges include different ionization probabilities of the two polymers, and finding small peaks in background noise for species that are in the minority in the mixture. Fourteen labs from 5 countries participated: 6 industrial, 4 academic, and 4 government.
 

Results

line
 
graph
  • Individual labs’ agreements with gravimetric result could be quite poor
  • Collectively agreement is better due to cancellation of uncertainties
  • Systematic uncertainty for 50:50 mixtures a surprise
  • Raw data (not shown) showed wide miscalibrations of the mass axis, some on the order of 20 u when <1 u is expected
  • Lessons Learned

    line
  • Statistically significant variation among laboratories even for this “easy” mixture.
  • Errors in mass calibration an important issue. This was unanticipated
  • Optimization of instrument for signal to noise ratio the most important factor in “getting it right”
  • Recapitulates the need for an unbiased, automated peak integration routine when the S/N is poor
  •  

    Actions Taken

    line
  • We will strengthen our effort to develop protocols to help practitioners optimize instrument parameters
  • We will promote MassSpectator as a benchmark method to perform peak integration
  •  

    Contributors:

    line
    Charles M. Guttman, Stephanie J. Wetzel, Kathleen M. Flynn, David L. Vanderhart, Bruno M. Fanconi, William E. Wallace
     
     
     
     
     
     
    line
    NIST logo
    Characterization and Measurement Group
    Polymers Division
    Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory

     
    NIST Polymers Division Logo