Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Med J Aust. 2010 Apr 19;192(8):458-60.

    Homeopathy: what does the "best" evidence tell us?

    Source

    Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. Edzard.Ernst@pms.ac.uk

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    To evaluate the evidence for and against the effectiveness of homeopathy.

    DATA SOURCES:

    The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (generally considered to be the most reliable source of evidence) was searched in January 2010.

    STUDY SELECTION:

    Cochrane reviews with the term "homeopathy" in the title, abstract or keywords were considered. Protocols of reviews were excluded. Six articles met the inclusion criteria.

    DATA EXTRACTION:

    Each of the six reviews was examined for specific subject matter; number of clinical trials reviewed; total number of patients involved; and authors' conclusions. The reviews covered the following conditions: cancer, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, asthma, dementia, influenza and induction of labour.

    DATA SYNTHESIS:

    The findings of the reviews were discussed narratively (the reviews' clinical and statistical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis).

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The findings of currently available Cochrane reviews of studies of homeopathy do not show that homeopathic medicines have effects beyond placebo.

    Comment in

    PMID:
    20402610
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Australasian Medical Publishing Company
      Write to the Help Desk