Workplace Sexual Harassment:
Experts Suggest Expanding Data Collection to Improve Understanding of Prevalence and Costs
GAO-20-564: Published: Sep 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 16, 2020.
Multimedia:
-
PODCAST: Measuring Sexual Harassment in the Workplace and Its Costs
Many workers experience sexual harassment in their workplace. However, the prevalence of workplace sexual harassment in the United States--as well as the costs to the employee and their employer--are not fully understood. We talk to Cindy Brown Barnes, an expert on employment and equal opportunity issues, and the Managing Director of our Education, Workforce and Income Security Team.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-7215
brownbarnesc@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Workplace sexual harassment is illegal. But how prevalent is it? And how costly are legal fees, lost productivity, and other consequences?
We found few reliable nationwide estimates across workplaces. Experts say recurring national surveys would help answer these questions.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission collects data on sexual harassment claims but can't fully analyze the problem. Specifically, EEOC doesn't separate data on claims that employers retaliated against workers who reported sexual harassment from claims that employers retaliated for other reasons.
We recommended EEOC improve its ability to analyze this data.
Multimedia:
-
PODCAST: Measuring Sexual Harassment in the Workplace and Its Costs
Many workers experience sexual harassment in their workplace. However, the prevalence of workplace sexual harassment in the United States--as well as the costs to the employee and their employer--are not fully understood. We talk to Cindy Brown Barnes, an expert on employment and equal opportunity issues, and the Managing Director of our Education, Workforce and Income Security Team.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-7215
brownbarnesc@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
Limited nationwide data hinder a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and costs of workplace sexual harassment. According to GAO's analysis of available federal data and literature review, the few reliable nationwide estimates of sexual harassment's prevalence vary substantially due to differences in methodology, including the question structure and time period the survey used. Moreover, the likelihood of experiencing workplace sexual harassment can vary based on an individual's demographic characteristics—such as gender, race, and age—and whether the workplace is male- or female-dominated. For example, women, younger workers, and women in male-dominated workplaces were more likely to say they experienced harassment. GAO did not find any recent cost estimates of workplace sexual harassment, but identified four broad categories of costs: health, productivity, career, and reporting and legal costs (see figure).
Examples of Costs Associated with Workplace Sexual Harassment
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), as part of its mission to prevent and remedy unlawful employment discrimination, maintains data on sexual harassment and retaliation charges filed against employers, but cannot systematically analyze the relationship between the two for all charges filed nationwide. After filing sexual harassment charges or engaging in other protected activity, employees may experience retaliation, such as firing or demotion, and EEOC data show that retaliation charges constitute a growing portion of its workload. EEOC's planning documents highlight its intention to address retaliation and use charge data to inform its outreach to employers. However, while EEOC can review electronic copies of individual charges for details, such as whether a previously filed sexual harassment charge led to a retaliation charge, its data system cannot aggregate this information across all charges. Without the capacity to fully analyze trends in the relationship between sexual harassment and retaliation charges, EEOC may miss opportunities to refine its work with employers to prevent and address retaliation.
Experts at GAO's roundtable said nationally representative surveys would help to improve available information on workplace sexual harassment. Expert recommendations focused on three main areas: (1) survey administration and resources, including advantages and disadvantages to various federal roles; (2) methods to collect data, such as using stand-alone surveys or adding questions to existing surveys; and (3) content of data to be collected, including employee and employer characteristics and specific costs.
Why GAO Did This Study
While many workers in the United States experience workplace sexual harassment—resulting in substantial costs to them and their employers—the extent of sexual harassment and the magnitude of its effects are not fully understood.
GAO was asked to examine the extent to which reliable information is available on workplace sexual harassment's prevalence and costs. This report examines (1) what is known about the prevalence and costs of U.S. workplace sexual harassment, including the federal workforce, (2) the extent to which EEOC collects sexual harassment data, and (3) data collection approaches experts recommend to improve available information. To address these objectives, GAO analyzed EEOC data and survey data from other federal agencies, interviewed officials and reviewed documentation from multiple federal agencies, and interviewed experts on sexual harassment. GAO also convened a 2-day roundtable of experts, with assistance from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and conducted a literature review.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that EEOC assess the feasibility of systematically analyzing its data on retaliation charges and the associated protected activities, including those related to sexual harassment. EEOC did not state whether or not it concurred with GAO's recommendation. GAO continues to believe this recommendation is appropriate, as discussed in the report.
For more information, contact Cindy S. Brown Barnes at (202) 512-7215 or brownbarnesc@gao.gov.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Status: Open
Comments: EEOC did not state whether it concurred with this recommendation. The agency noted steps it has taken to improve its ability to collect and use quality data, and highlighted its ability both to analyze demographic information for individuals who file retaliation charges and to examine the bases and issues alleged in retaliation charges. EEOC also questioned how analyzing additional data on retaliation charges would remedy a lack of comprehensive data on sexual harassment's prevalence and costs, but acknowledged that such data may generally help the agency conduct more targeted outreach activities. We agree that EEOC is able to analyze some aspects of retaliation charges. Rather, the agency is not able to efficiently analyze the protected activities that underlie retaliation charges, which hinders it from better understanding the precursors to retaliation. Given the growth in retaliation charges, we continue to believe EEOC should consider opportunities to analyze additional data that could shed further light on the factors that contribute to this growth, such as the types of protected activities that are leading to retaliation charges. As EEOC acknowledged, additional data on protected activities may also help the agency conduct more targeted outreach. For both of these reasons, we believe EEOC should explore the feasibility of collecting these data.
Recommendation: As part of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's plans to implement a new data system, the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should assess the feasibility of developing the agency's capacity to systematically analyze retaliation charge data, including the protected activities associated with these charges. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »
Dec 3, 2020
-
Gender Pay Differences:
The Pay Gap for Federal Workers Has Continued to Narrow, but Better Quality Data on Promotions Are NeededGAO-21-67: Published: Dec 3, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2020.
Oct 19, 2020
-
VA Health Care:
Better Data Needed to Assess the Health Outcomes of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender VeteransGAO-21-69: Published: Oct 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 19, 2020.
Sep 8, 2020
-
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac:
Efforts to Promote Diversity and InclusionGAO-20-637: Published: Sep 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 8, 2020.
Jul 22, 2020
-
Sexual Harassment:
VA Needs to Better Protect EmployeesGAO-20-654T: Published: Jul 22, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 22, 2020.
Jun 23, 2020
-
USAID:
Mixed Progress in Increasing Diversity, and Actions Needed to Consistently Meet EEO RequirementsGAO-20-477: Published: Jun 23, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 23, 2020.
Jun 17, 2020
-
State Department:
Additional Steps Are Needed to Identify Barriers to Workforce DiversityGAO-20-515T: Published: Jun 17, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 17, 2020.
Jun 11, 2020
-
Disability Employment:
Hiring Has Increased but Actions Needed to Assess Retention, Training, and Reasonable Accommodation EffortsGAO-20-384: Published: Jun 11, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 11, 2020.
Mar 19, 2020
-
Sexual Harassment in STEM Research:
Agencies Have Taken Actions, but Need Complaint Procedures, Overall Plans, and Better CollaborationGAO-20-187: Published: Mar 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Mar 19, 2020.
Feb 27, 2020
-
Equal Employment Opportunity:
DHS Could Better Address Challenges to Ensuring EEO in Its WorkforceGAO-20-450T: Published: Feb 27, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 27, 2020.
Sep 19, 2019
-
Equal Employment Opportunity:
Progress Made on GAO Recommendations to Improve Nondiscrimination Oversight, but Challenges RemainGAO-19-719T: Published: Sep 19, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 19, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here