DOD Supply Chain:
Suspect Counterfeit Electronic Parts Can Be Found on Internet Purchasing Platforms
GAO-12-375: Published: Feb 21, 2012. Publicly Released: Mar 26, 2012.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
Contact:
(202) 512-6722
mcelrathw@gao.gov
Timothy M. Persons, Ph.D.
(202) 512-6522
personst@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
Suspect counterfeit and boguspart numbers that are not associated with any authentic partsmilitary-grade electronic parts can be found on Internet purchasing platforms, as none of the 16 parts vendors provided to GAO were legitimate. Suspect counterfeit, which applies to the first two categories of parts that were tested, is the strongest term used by an independent testing lab, signifying a potential violation of intellectual property rights, copyrights, or trademark laws, or misrepresentation to defraud or deceive. After submitting requests for quotes on both platforms, GAO received responses from 396 vendors, of which 334 were located in China; 25 in the United States; and 37 in other countries, including the United Kingdom and Japan. Of the 16 parts purchased, vendors usually responded within a day. GAO selected the first of any vendor among those offering the lowest prices that provided enough information to purchase a given part, generally within 2 weeks. Under GAOs selection methodology, all 16 parts were provided by vendors in China.
Specifically, all 12 of the parts received after GAO requested rare part numbers or postproduction date codes were suspect counterfeit, according to the testing lab. Multiple authentication tests, ranging from inspection with electron microscopes to X-ray analysis, revealed that the parts had been re-marked to display the part numbers and manufacturer logos of authentic parts. Other features were found to be deficient from military standards, such as the metallic composition of certain pieces. For the parts requested using postproduction date codes, the vendors also altered date markings to represent the parts as newer than when they were last manufactured, as verified by the parts makers. Finally, after submitting requests for bogus parts using invalid part numbers, GAO purchased four parts from four vendors, which shows their willingness to supply parts that do not technically exist.
Why GAO Did This Study
Counterfeit partsgenerally the misrepresentation of parts identity or pedigreecan seriously disrupt the Department of Defense (DOD) supply chain, harm weapon systems integrity, and endanger troops lives. In a November testimony (GAO-12-213T), GAO summarized preliminary observations from its investigation into the purchase and authenticity testing of selected, military-grade electronic parts that may enter the DOD supply chain. As requested, this report presents GAOs final findings on this issue. The results are based on a nongeneralizable sample and cannot be used to make inferences about the extent to which parts are being counterfeited. GAO created a fictitious company and gained membership to two Internet platforms providing access to vendors selling military-grade electronic parts. GAO requested quotes from numerous vendors to purchase a total of 16 parts from three categories: (1) authentic part numbers for obsolete and rare parts; (2) authentic part numbers with postproduction date codes (date code after the last date the part was manufactured); and (3) bogus, or fictitious, part numbers that are not associated with any authentic parts. To determine whether the parts received were counterfeit, GAO contracted with a qualified, independent testing lab for full component authentication analysis of the first two categories of parts, but not the third (bogus) category. Part numbers have been altered for reporting purposes. GAO is not making recommendations in this report.
For more information, contact Richard J. Hillman at (202) 512-6722 or hillmanr@gao.gov or Timothy Persons at (202) 512-6522 or personst@gao.gov.
Feb 10, 2017
-
Defense Civil Support:
DOD, HHS, and DHS Should Use Existing Coordination Mechanisms to Improve Their Pandemic PreparednessGAO-17-150: Published: Feb 10, 2017. Publicly Released: Feb 10, 2017.
Feb 3, 2017
-
Depot Maintenance:
Executed Workload and Maintenance Operations at DOD DepotsGAO-17-82R: Published: Feb 3, 2017. Publicly Released: Feb 3, 2017. -
Military Compensation:
Additional Actions Are Needed to Better Manage Special and Incentive Pay ProgramsGAO-17-39: Published: Feb 3, 2017. Publicly Released: Feb 3, 2017.
Jan 31, 2017
-
Unmanned Aerial Systems:
Air Force and Army Should Improve Strategic Human Capital Planning for Pilot WorkforcesGAO-17-53: Published: Jan 31, 2017. Publicly Released: Jan 31, 2017. -
Defense Infrastructure:
DOD Needs Clearer Guidance on Notifying Congress of Privately Financed Construction Projects [Reissued on January 31, 2017]GAO-17-76: Published: Jan 19, 2017. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2017.
Jan 30, 2017
-
Military Personnel:
DOD and the Coast Guard Need to Screen for Gambling Disorder Addiction and Update GuidanceGAO-17-114: Published: Jan 30, 2017. Publicly Released: Jan 30, 2017.
Jan 10, 2017
-
Military Personnel:
DOD Has Processes for Operating and Managing Its Sexual Assault Incident DatabaseGAO-17-99: Published: Jan 10, 2017. Publicly Released: Jan 10, 2017.
Dec 8, 2016
-
Littoral Combat Ship and Frigate:
Slowing Planned Frigate Acquisition Would Enable Better-Informed DecisionsGAO-17-279T: Published: Dec 8, 2016. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2016.
Dec 7, 2016
-
Defense Business Transformation:
DOD Should Improve Its Planning with and Performance Monitoring of the Military DepartmentsGAO-17-9: Published: Dec 7, 2016. Publicly Released: Dec 7, 2016.
Dec 5, 2016
-
Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex:
DOD Needs to Fully Incorporate Best Practices into Future Cost EstimatesGAO-17-29: Published: Nov 3, 2016. Publicly Released: Dec 5, 2016.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here