logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Monolithic Photoelectrochemical Device for Direct Water Splitting with 19% Efficiency

  • Wen-Hui Cheng
    Wen-Hui Cheng
    Department of Applied Physics and Material Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
  • Matthias H. Richter
    Matthias H. Richter
    Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
  • Matthias M. May*
    Matthias M. May
    Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Institute for Solar Fuels, D-14109 Berlin, Germany
    Department of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, D-98693 Ilmenau, Germany
    *E-mail: [email protected] (M.M.M.).
  • Jens Ohlmann
    Jens Ohlmann
    Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
    More by Jens Ohlmann
  • David Lackner
    David Lackner
    Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
  • Frank Dimroth
    Frank Dimroth
    Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
  • Thomas Hannappel*
    Thomas Hannappel
    Department of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, D-98693 Ilmenau, Germany
    *E-mail: [email protected] (T.H.).
  • Harry A. Atwater*
    Harry A. Atwater
    Department of Applied Physics and Material Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected] (H.A.A.).
  • , and 
  • Hans-Joachim Lewerenz
    Hans-Joachim Lewerenz
    Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
Cite this: ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 8, 1795–1800
Publication Date (Web):June 25, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920
Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society
Subscribed Access
Article Views
5791
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (3 MB) OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Efficient unassisted solar water splitting, a pathway to storable renewable energy in the form of chemical bonds, requires optimization of a photoelectrochemical device based on photovoltaic tandem heterojunctions. We report a monolithic photocathode device architecture that exhibits significantly reduced surface reflectivity, minimizing parasitic light absorption and reflection losses. A tailored multifunctional crystalline titania interphase layer acts as a corrosion protection layer, with favorable band alignment between the semiconductor conduction band and the energy level for water reduction, facilitating electron transport at the cathode–electrolyte interface. It also provides a favorable substrate for adhesion of high-activity Rh catalyst nanoparticles. Under simulated AM 1.5G irradiation, solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies of 19.3 and 18.5% are obtained in acidic and neutral electrolytes, respectively. The system reaches a value of 0.85 of the theoretical limit for photoelectrochemical water splitting for the energy gap combination employed in the tandem-junction photoelectrode structure.

Electrochemical water splitting was achieved by van Trostwijk and Deiman in 1789 and, about a decade later, by Nicholsen and Carlisle,(1,2) whereas light-induced unassisted water splitting with rutile as a photoanode was reported in 1972, resulting in a small but measurable efficiency.(3) Efficient solar water splitting was first achieved using a dual-junction tandem photoelectrode(4) under a light intensity equivalent to 11 suns.

In 2015, several devices with solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency greater than 10% at 1 sun illumination were reported,(5) and in 2017, an efficiency of 16.2% was achieved.(6) Overall, advances in solar water splitting(1) have led to a number of functional prototypes of photoelectrochemical and photoelectrosynthetic cells in recent years,(2) featuring improved photoelectrode stability through the use of corrosion protection layers.(7,8) However, comparison of STH efficiencies realized so far with theoretical limiting efficiencies(9) shows considerable room for further improvement; at present, the highest-efficiency systems reach about 2/3 of the theoretical limiting value for a given photoelectrode. To enable STH efficiencies approaching theoretical limits, the photovoltage has to be as large as possible, which requires a minimized photoelectrode dark current. This in turn dictates that the charge carrier recombination at interfaces must be prevented. To maximize the photocurrent, a reduction of the photoelectrode surface reflectivity under operating conditions is also required, as is mitigation of light absorption in the catalyst layer applied to the photoelectrode surface.(10)

If one utilizes the band gap combination of a given tandem photoelectrode and the best reported exchange current densities for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and omits losses due to external radiative efficiency (ERE) defined as the portion of radiative recombination to the total (radiative and nonradiative) recombination and solution resistance, the realistic limiting STH efficiencies can be calculated.(9) For the tandem photoelectrode used here (see Supporting Information section S1), this value is 22.8%. Approaching such limiting efficiencies provides a clear objective for a renewable fuels technology because inclusion of hydrogen in the existing worldwide fuel generation infrastructure could enable direct and widespread application of renewable fuels in the transportation sector and for electricity generation.(11)

Here, we demonstrate an approach to achieving efficiencies near the theoretical limits for the photoelectrode energy band gaps employed. A key aspect of our approach is (i) the use of a crystalline anatase TiO2 photocathode interfacial layer (see Supporting Information section S3), deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD), to facilitate reduced reflectivity and interface recombination velocity and (ii) a size distribution and spatial arrangement of Rh catalyst nanoparticles (NPs) tailored to achieve ultralow light attenuation. The crystalline anatase TiO2 interlayer shows excellent energy band alignment with the tandem window layer and its interfacial ultrathin oxidized surface part and with the electrolyte. In addition, it serves as an efficient antireflection coating and as a support for the catalyst NPs, with enhanced adhesion relative to III–V compound semiconductor surfaces.

We employ a dual-junction tandem photoelectrode where the high-band-gap subcell thickness has been increased for better current matching and the transparency of the tunnel diode was improved.(10,12,13) To further increase the STH efficiency, interfacial layers have been designed to reduce charge carrier recombination and to increase optical light coupling into the photoelectrode absorber layers. The surface conditioning sequence resulted in etching of the GaAs cap layer by an NH4OH–H2O2–H2O solution, leaving an oxidized surface layer (AlInPOx) on top of the n+-doped AlInP window layer (see Supporting Information section S1). A crystalline anatase TiO2 film with an effective thickness of 30 nm was deposited to act as a corrosion protection layer and an antireflection coating, as well as serving as a conducting substrate surface for photoelectrodeposition of Rh NP electrocatalysts. The Rh NPs exhibited large surface areas and thus high exchange current and, simultaneously, particularly low light attenuation. The photocathode device configuration employed is generally less prone to photodecomposition than photoanode devices, where charge carriers with high oxidation potential are present at the semiconductor surface. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the resulting device: the photoelectrode consisting of GaInP and GaInAs subcells on a GaAs substrate, an anatase TiO2 protective layer, the Rh NP catalyst layer, and a sputtered RuO2 counter electrode (OER) are depicted. Also depicted on the side of the layer structure in Figure 1 is an energy band diagram under illumination where the quasi-Fermi levels show the splitting for electrons and holes necessary to achieve unassisted water splitting (see Supporting Information section S4). The surface of the crystalline TiO2 film illustrated in Figure 1b indicates a continuous film with height variations, seen by AFM, that give it a flake-like appearance. Figure 1c illustrates the protocol for pulsed photoelectrodeposition of Rh catalyst NPs (see Supporting Information section S1), and the inset gives SEM and AFM images of the Rh NPs. Figure 1c depicts the procedure to obtain the highest-activity catalysts at almost negligible light attenuation; fine control of particle size smaller than 20 nm was achieved by careful adjustment of the electrode potential, enabling considerably higher catalyst loading compared to that of a dense film of equivalent catalyst loading deposited by conventional vapor-phase or electrochemical reduction. This procedure facilitates photocathodes with high-transparency catalysts, which maintain high photocurrent densities and result in increased efficiency, which is determined from the relation(1)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Functionalization of a dual-junction tandem as the photoelectrode for unassisted water splitting: (a) schematic of the device structure after functionalization with interfacial films and electrocatalysts (see text); (b) topography of the crystalline anatase TiO2 layer by HRSEM and AFM; (c) protocol of the photoelectrodeposition of Rh NPs; the arrow shows the potential used for stroboscopic deposition under white light illumination, as shown in the upper left inset. The potential choices made are indicated by black dots; the best result was obtained for E = +0.3 V vs SCE. Resulting Rh particles are shown in the inset under the JV characteristic (upper image: SEM; lower one: AFM). The potential control and corresponding particle size distribution are included in Supporting Information section S1. The root-mean-square surface roughness of TiO2 is 6.3 and 3.6 nm (with/without Rh, respectively).

The solar fuel generator efficiency ηSTH is given by the operating current at the counter electrode potential, the thermodynamic value for the reaction (Erxn = 1.23 V for water splitting under standard conditions), and the reaction Faradaic efficiency fFE, determined by gas product analysis measurements.

Electronically, the photoelectrode configuration used here facilitates alignment of the conduction bands of the AlInP window layer of the tandem photoelectrode to the indium oxide and indium phosphate layers (created by the cap layer etching process) and the anatase TiO2 protection/antireflective layer. We note that photogenerated electrons, which are minority carriers in the main part of the tandem subcells, become majority carriers in the AlInP and TiO2 layers, reducing recombination losses in carrier transport. Details of the energy band alignment and the photoelectron spectroscopy and optical data used to support it are described in the Supporting Information section S4. In addition, the large valence band offset between AlInP and TiO2 blocks interfacial hole transport, resulting in a small overall reverse saturation current, improving the photovoltage. This feature is important for achieving high STH efficiencies.

The influence of the surface modifications on optical properties and on the photocurrent is shown in Figure 2. A reduction of the reflectivity by ∼15% is achieved by use of the TiO2 interlayer (Supporting Information section S5), whereas the Rh NPs in Figure 2a show negligible additional absorption, which is attributed to the blue-shifted plasmonic resonance of the Rh NPs. For particle sizes below 20 nm, a shift from the visible region into the ultraviolet one occurs, making the Rh layer almost fully transparent.(14−16) The detailed optimization of the optical design regarding the thickness of TiO2 and Rh particle size is discussed in Supporting Information section S6 including both simulations and experimental support.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Optoelectronic properties of the surface-functionalized electrolyte/Rh/TiO2/oxide/AlInP–GaInP/GaInAs/GaAs water splitting device; (a) reflectivity Ra, measured in air, of the dual-junction tandem solar cell without ARC (black curve) and second reflectivity obtained after TiO2 coating (blue curve) and after photoelectrochemically deposited Rh NPs (yellow curve); Ra is larger than that under operation in electrolyte due to the different refractive indices of air and water; (b) comparison of the output characteristics of the tandem device after cap layer etching and of the full surface-functionalized photoelectrode. The orange arrows indicate the improvement after incorporation of the TiO2 layer.

The corresponding photocurrent–voltage characteristics in acidic electrolyte demonstrate a pronounced increase in the current and, as expected, also a shift of the bend of the photocurrent characteristic toward more anodic potentials, thereby additionally increasing the photocurrent at the RuO2 counter electrode (OER) potential. The result with incorporation of TiO2 is a relative increase of 28% of the tandem cell output. A STH efficiency of 19.3% is obtained at 0 V, with an operating current of 15.7 mA/cm2, assuming an initial Faradaic efficiency of unity, which is supported by the gas evolution measurements shown in Figure 3b. These data represent a 20% increase in efficiency above the previously reported 1 sun photoelectrosynthetic cell efficiency benchmark.(6)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Output characteristics of the RuO2–GaAs/GaInAs/GaInP/AlInP–anatase TiO2–Rh/electrolyte dual-junction tandem structure: (a) photocurrent–voltage characteristics in acidic (pH 0) and neutral (pH 7) electrolyte and in neutral electrolyte including an AEM membrane; (b) chronoamperometric data of the initial temporal regime; (c) stability measurements at −0.4 V vs a RuO2 counter electrode for acidic and neutral pH; (d) hydrogen and oxygen gas collection for operation in acidic (open spheres) and neutral (full spheres) electrolyte. The measured gas volume for oxygen (blue symbols) and hydrogen (red symbols) is overlaid with the expected produced gas volume, as calculated from charge passed through the anode and cathode.

The high photocurrent at 0 V vs RuO2 indicates that electron transport is virtually uninhibited from the absorber layer through the indium and phosphorus oxide and TiO2 interfacial layers to the electrolyte. The corresponding energy band relations can be inferred from surface characterization using ultraviolet and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. While the simplest approach to assessment of band alignment follows Anderson’s idealized model(17) for planar contacts and does not consider energy band shifts due to surface and/or interface dipoles, this approach certainly does not apply here as the junctions formed at the AlInP/oxide, oxide/TiO2, and TiO2/Rh/electrolyte interfaces are complex. Thus, the energy band diagram of the heterojunction structure was inferred from ultraviolet and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements and can be found in the Supporting Information section S4. It should be noted that equilibrium formation between small metallic catalyst NPs and semiconductors appears to depend on the substrate doping level(5) and obviously does not follow a Schottky thermionic emission model, in particular, in contact with an electrolyte.(18,19) In addition, metal work functions depend on NP size;(20) therefore, comparison of the energy levels of NP catalyst layers with planar thin films is notably challenging; therefore, only an estimate of the NP catalyst layer energy level can be given, supported by the device operating data.

The output data shown in Figure 2b were obtained in an acidic electrolyte of pH 0. Figure 3 summarizes the main performance characteristics. Figure 3a illustrates the photocurrent–voltage characteristics under three conditions: (i) at pH 0 with 19.3% STH, (ii) at neutral pH with 18.5% STH, and (iii) using an anion exchange membrane (AEM) with a STH of 14.8%. The observed unassisted water splitting efficiencies critically depend on the experimental conditions (details about the efficiency benchmarking of our PEC device under AM 1.5G conditions, as well as a discussion of efficiency accuracy and polarization loss, are given in the Supporting Information section S7).

Figure 3b gives the unassisted two-electrode photocurrent density vs time for the initial operation regime, showing that while the photocurrent density decreases with time for acidic pH it remains more stable in neutral pH solutions. Chronoamperometric tests (at −0.4 V vs counter electrode, as shown in Figure 3c) show that the device photocurrent density decreases in an acidic electrolyte to low values within 3 h. However, in neutral pH electrolyte, stability over 20 h was demonstrated, with the photocurrent density remaining at 83% of its initial value (see comparative PEC test conditions and results in the Supporting Information section S8). In both cases, for pH 0 and 7, near-unity Faradaic efficiency is confirmed through the agreement between the expected (solid line) and measured gas volumes (symbols) in Figure 3d. However, whereas the curves for pH 7 stay linear with a constant gas production rate for H2/O2, as expected from the stability measurements, the curves for pH 0 show a deviation from linearity due to the decreasing photocurrent.

Etching of TiO2 is expected to occur at pH 0 but not at pH 7, as can be seen in the TiO2 Pourbaix diagram in Supporting Informatoin section S10. Corrosion reactions can degrade the junction photovoltage, as well as lead to undercutting and removal of catalyst particles, thus reducing the exchange current of the Rh NP arrangement and slowing of the HER kinetics. The system reacts also sensitively to series resistance changes, as illustrated by characteristics for devices employing an anion exchange membrane. The bend of the JV curve is shifted to cathodic potentials. However, device operation at pH 7 still yields a high STH efficiency of 18.5% and the device appears to be stable for a more extended period, in accordance with predictions of TiO2 stability from thermodynamics. Even a slower reduction of the photocurrent is observed; we found that this photocurrent reduction could be partially reversed by immersion of the device from the electrolyte solution and applying a soft cleansing procedure (see Supporting Information section S8). The observation that the photocurrent can be partially restored appears to rule out loss of Rh catalyst particles or even partial removal of the anatase interfacial layer as causes of photocurrent reduction. We find, however, that the surface chemistry of Rh is influenced by the phosphate buffer of the neutral electrolyte; XPS in Supporting Information section S10 clearly indicates PO4 formation on the Rh surfaces because of the absence of an In signal, which would have been observed in case of InPOx formation, concurrent with corrosion of the absorber. The photoelectrode regeneration procedure results in a 50% recovery of the photocurrent lost during the first 12 h, suggesting that the high porosity of the Rh NP layer inhibits full recovery by short intermediate treatment. Employing a different electrolyte for pH 7 conditions might therefore benefit long-term activity of the device. (see details in Supporting Information section S10).

Increasing the efficiency of a photoelectrosynthetic device from already high values toward theoretical limits is especially challenging. We have used a series of surface conditioning steps that have a two-fold function: light management was drastically improved and the electronic properties were at least maintained. Compared to our earlier results,(5) we see an increase in the available cell voltage that is related to the increase in photocurrent at the counter electrode operation potential. Junction formation between the etched AlInP layer, TiO2 layer, and Rh NPs suggests that the Fermi level alignment is nearly ideal.

Figure 4 shows a summary to date of selected STH efficiencies realized for monolithic integrated photoelectrosynthetic devices capable of unassisted water splitting.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Comparison of realized limiting STH efficiencies and historic development. The analysis refers to a theoretical benchmarking value ηtheo (see text) and takes into account the top and bottom cell band gaps for the respective photolysis cells; also shown are the institutions of the contributing research teams. Abbreviations: NREL - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA; ISE - Institute for Solar Energy, Germany; JCAP - Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Caltech; TU-I - Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany; HZB - Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Germany. The bar chart on the right indicates the achieved efficiency with respect to the respective theoretical limit (ηtheo*). See detail values in Supporting Information section S10.

Using the parameters shown in Table 1, our photoelectrosynthetic device reaches 0.85 of the theoretical limiting efficiency. It should be noted that the theoretical efficiency determined from the data in Table 1 is based on the best presently known electrocatalysts, a unity photoelectrode radiative efficiency, and an absence of absorption losses.(9) We also calculated the STH efficiency as a function of Tafel slope, exchange current density, and ohmic drop to evaluate whether the optical or the electrochemical polarization losses dominate the solar cell performance (see Supporting Information section S7, Figure S17). Our record device is located in the region of highest efficiency, showing that the optical loss is the limiting factor. However, the system, in principle, reacts sensitively to the polarization losses, emphasizing the importance of judiciously combining the interface and catalyst.

Table 1. Approaches to Theoretical Limitation of Light-Induced Photoelectrochemical Water Splittinga
 J0,cathode [mA cm–2]J0, anode [mA cm–2]fabsERERs [Ω]Rsh [Ω]
ideal110
JXC limited110–3110
JXC and optically limited110–30.90.030
a

Ideal: only exchange current density-limited and devices that are optically and electrochemically limited are displayed in rows 1–3, respectively. For the used band gap combination and only catalytic exchange current density (JXC) limitation, ηtheo = 22.8% at AM 1.5G irradiation.

Stability appears to remain an issue of this photocathode device configuration, but we have demonstrated high efficiency in neutral electrolytes and that extended operation of photocathode devices becomes possible if one can control the Rh surface chemistry. The use of Rh NPs with tailored size and shape distributions enables ultralow absorption. The future design of even more optimized tandem photoelectrodes appears to be possible, enabling solar fuel generation (water splitting as well as CO2 or N2 reduction) efficiencies to be even higher than those reported here, for example, with STH champion device efficiencies of >20% for integrated direct water photolysis being a realistic goal.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920.

  • Device fabrication; materials characterization techniques; TiO2 characterization; surface layer band alignment; absorption enhancement by TiO2; optimization of the optical design; assessment of the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency measurement; comparative PEC test conditions and results; surface tension variation between pH 0 and 7; X-ray photoelectron spectra and mechanism development; and STH benchmarks (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Matthias M. May - Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, United Kingdom; Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Institute for Solar Fuels, D-14109 Berlin, Germany; Department of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, D-98693 Ilmenau, Germany; Email: [email protected]
    • Thomas Hannappel - Department of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, D-98693 Ilmenau, Germany; Email: [email protected]
    • Harry A. Atwater - Department of Applied Physics and Material Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States; Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States; Orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-0201; Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Wen-Hui Cheng - Department of Applied Physics and Material Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States; Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    • Matthias H. Richter - Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States; Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
    • Jens Ohlmann - Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
    • David Lackner - Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
    • Frank Dimroth - Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
    • Hans-Joachim Lewerenz - Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States; Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
  • Author Contributions

    T.H., H.J.L, M.M.M., W.H.C., M.H.R. and H.A.A. conceived of the experimental study. W.H.C. and M.H.R. executed the experiments and did the data analysis. J.O., D.L., and F.D. prepared the tandem absorber. W.H.C., M.H.R., H.J.L., and H.A.A. wrote the paper, and all authors commented on the manuscript.

  • Notes

    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors acknowledge Katherine T. Fountaine for the calculation of theoretical photocurrent efficiencies of 2J PEC devices. This work was supported through the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Award No. DE SC0004993 to the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, a DOE Energy Innovation Hub. Research was in part carried out at the Molecular Materials Research Center of the Beckman Institute of the California Institute of Technology. The work on tandem absorbers was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and research (BMBF) under Contract Number FKZ 03F0432A (HyCon). M.M.M. acknowledges funding from the fellowship programme of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, Grant LPDS 2015-09.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 20 other publications.

  1. 1
    Walter, M. G.; Warren, E. L.; McKone, J. R.; Boettcher, S. W.; Mi, Q.; Santori, E. A.; Lewis, N. S. Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 64466473,  DOI: 10.1021/cr1002326
  2. 2
    Xiang, C.; Weber, A. Z.; Ardo, S.; Berger, A.; Chen, Y.; Coridan, R.; Fountaine, K. T.; Haussener, S.; Hu, S.; Liu, R. Modeling, Simulation, and Implementation of Solar-Driven Water-Splitting Devices. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1297412988,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201510463
  3. 3
    Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 3738,  DOI: 10.1038/238037a0
  4. 4
    Khaselev, O.; Turner, J. A. A Monolithic Photovoltaic-Photoelectrochemical Device for Hydrogen Production via Water Splitting. Science 1998, 280, 425427,  DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5362.425
  5. 5
    May, M. M.; Lewerenz, H. J.; Lackner, D.; Dimroth, F.; Hannappel, T. Efficient Direct Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion by in Situ Interface Transformation of a Tandem Structure. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8286,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9286
  6. 6
    Young, J. L.; Steiner, M. A.; Döscher, H.; France, R. M.; Turner, J. A.; Deutsch, T. G. Direct Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion via Inverted Metamorphic Multi-Junction Semiconductor Architectures. Nature Energy 2017, 2, 17028,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.28
  7. 7
    Lichterman, M. F.; Sun, K.; Hu, S.; Zhou, X.; McDowell, M. T.; Shaner, M. R.; Richter, M. H.; Crumlin, E. J.; Carim, A. I.; Saadi, F. H. Protection of Inorganic Semiconductors for Sustained, Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Catal. Today 2016, 262, 1123,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.017
  8. 8
    Bae, D.; Pedersen, T.; Seger, B.; Iandolo, B.; Hansen, O.; Vesborg, P. C. K.; Chorkendorff, I. Carrier-Selective P- and N-Contacts for Efficient and Stable Photocatalytic Water Reduction. Catal. Today 2017, 290, 5964,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.028
  9. 9
    Fountaine, K. T.; Lewerenz, H. J.; Atwater, H. A. Efficiency Limits for Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13706,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13706
  10. 10
    May, M. M.; Lackner, D.; Ohlmann, J.; Dimroth, F.; van de Krol, R.; Hannappel, T.; Schwarzburg, K. On the Benchmarking of Multi-Junction Photoelectrochemical Fuel Generating Devices. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 492503,  DOI: 10.1039/C6SE00083E
  11. 11
    Sathre, R.; Scown, C. D.; Morrow, W. R.; Stevens, J. C.; Sharp, I. D.; Ager, J. W., III; Walczak, K. A.; Houle, F. A.; Greenblatt, J. B. Life-Cycle Net Energy Assessment of Large-Scale Hydrogen Production via Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 32643278,  DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01019A
  12. 12
    Dimroth, F.; Beckert, R.; Meusel, M.; Schubert, U.; Bett, A. W. Metamorphic GayIn1-YP/Ga1-XInXAs Tandem Solar Cells for Space and for Terrestrial Concentrator Applications at C > 1000 Suns. Prog. Photovoltaics 2001, 9, 165178,  DOI: 10.1002/pip.362
  13. 13
    Ohlmann, J.; Sanchez, J. F. M.; Lackner, D.; Förster, P.; Steiner, M.; Fallisch, A.; Dimroth, F. Recent Development in Direct Generation of Hydrogen Using Multi-Junction Solar Cells. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1766, 080004,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4962102
  14. 14
    Porter, J. D.; Heller, A.; Aspnes, D. E. Experiment and Theory of “Transparent” Metal Films. Nature 1985, 313, 664666,  DOI: 10.1038/313664a0
  15. 15
    Degani, Y.; Sheng, T. T.; Heller, A.; Aspnes, D. E.; Studna, A. A.; Porter, J. D. Transparent” Metals: Preparation and Characterization of Light-Transmitting Palladium, Rhodium, and Rhenium Films. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1987, 228, 167178,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(87)80105-5
  16. 16
    Sanz, J. M.; Ortiz, D.; Alcaraz de la Osa, R.; Saiz, J. M.; González, F.; Brown, A. S.; Losurdo, M.; Everitt, H. O.; Moreno, F. UV Plasmonic Behavior of Various Metal Nanoparticles in the Near- and Far-Field Regimes: Geometry and Substrate Effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1960619615,  DOI: 10.1021/jp405773p
  17. 17
    Anderson, R. L. Germanium-Gallium Arsenide Heterojunctions. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1960, 4, 283287,  DOI: 10.1147/rd.43.0283
  18. 18
    Skorupska, K.; Pettenkofer, C.; Sadewasser, S.; Streicher, F.; Haiss, W.; Lewerenz, H. J. Electronic and Morphological Properties of the Electrochemically Prepared Step Bunched Silicon (111) Surface. Phys. Status Solidi B 2011, 248, 361369,  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201046454
  19. 19
    Rizk, R.; de Mierry, P.; Ballutaud, D.; Aucouturier, M.; Mathiot, D. Hydrogen Diffusion and Passivation Processes in P- And N-Type Crystalline Silicon. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1991, 44, 61416151,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.6141
  20. 20
    Zhang, Y.; Pluchery, O.; Caillard, L.; Lamic-Humblot, A.-F.; Casale, S.; Chabal, Y. J.; Salmeron, M. B. Sensing the Charge State of Single Gold Nanoparticles via Work Function Measurements. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 5155,  DOI: 10.1021/nl503782s

Cited By


This article is cited by 112 publications.

  1. Marja Nappa, Michael Lienemann, Camilla Tossi, Peter Blomberg, Jussi Jäntti, Ilkka Juhani Tittonen, Merja Penttilä. Solar-Powered Carbon Fixation for Food and Feed Production Using Microorganisms—A Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis. ACS Omega 2020, Article ASAP.OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  2. Srinivas Vanka, Baowen Zhou, Rasha A. Awni, Zhaoning Song, Faqrul A. Chowdhury, Xuedong Liu, Hamed Hajibabaei, Wen Shi, Yixin Xiao, Ishtiaque A. Navid, Ayush Pandey, Rong Chen, Gianluigi A. Botton, Thomas W. Hamann, Dunwei Wang, Yanfa Yan, Zetian Mi. InGaN/Si Double-Junction Photocathode for Unassisted Solar Water Splitting. ACS Energy Letters 2020, 5 (12) , 3741-3751. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01583OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  3. A. Ziani, I. Al-Shankiti, M. A. Khan, H. Idriss. Integrated Photo-Electrocatalytic (PEC) Systems for Water Splitting to Hydrogen and Oxygen under Concentrated Sunlight: Effect of Internal Parameters on Performance. Energy & Fuels 2020, 34 (10) , 13179-13185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02481OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  4. Subash Rajasekar, Vinay Tiwari, Umish Srivastva, Steven Holdcroft. Effectiveness of CuO Nanoparticle-Based p–n Bulk-Heterojunction Electrodes for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2020, 3 (9) , 8988-9001. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c01419OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  5. Micha Ben-Naim, Reuben J. Britto, Chase W. Aldridge, Rachel Mow, Myles A. Steiner, Adam C. Nielander, Laurie A. King, Daniel J. Friedman, Todd G. Deutsch, James L. Young, Thomas F. Jaramillo. Addressing the Stability Gap in Photoelectrochemistry: Molybdenum Disulfide Protective Catalysts for Tandem III–V Unassisted Solar Water Splitting. ACS Energy Letters 2020, 5 (8) , 2631-2640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01132OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  6. Haotian Shi, Ryan T. Pekarek, Ran Chen, Boxin Zhang, Yu Wang, Indu Aravind, Zhi Cai, Lasse Jensen, Nathan R. Neale, Stephen B. Cronin. Monitoring Local Electric Fields using Stark Shifts on Napthyl Nitrile-Functionalized Silicon Photoelectrodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (31) , 17000-17005. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03966OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  7. Dibyendu Ghosh, Pooja Devi, Omkar Singh Kushwaha, Rajnish Kumar, Praveen Kumar. In Operando Generation and Storage of Hydrogen by Coupling Monolithically Integrated Photoelectrochemical Cell with Clathrate Hydrates Molecular Storage. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2020, 3 (7) , 6834-6844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c00945OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  8. Moritz Kölbach, Hannes Hempel, Karsten Harbauer, Markus Schleuning, Andrei Petsiuk, Katja Höflich, Victor Deinhart, Dennis Friedrich, Rainer Eichberger, Fatwa F. Abdi, Roel van de Krol. Grain Boundaries Limit the Charge Carrier Transport in Pulsed Laser Deposited α-SnWO4 Thin Film Photoabsorbers. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2020, 3 (5) , 4320-4330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c00028OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  9. Behrooz Eftekharinia, Hossein Pezeshki, Ali Dabirian. Unassisted Water Splitting Using Standard Silicon Solar Cells Stabilized with Copper and Bifunctional NiFe Electrocatalysts. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (15) , 17424-17435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b22622OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  10. Yubin Chen, Xiaoyang Feng, Ya Liu, Xiangjiu Guan, Clemens Burda, Liejin Guo. Metal Oxide-Based Tandem Cells for Self-Biased Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Energy Letters 2020, 5 (3) , 844-866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02620OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  11. Wen-Hui Cheng, Matthias H. Richter, Ian Sullivan, David M. Larson, Chengxiang Xiang, Bruce S. Brunschwig, Harry A. Atwater. CO2 Reduction to CO with 19% Efficiency in a Solar-Driven Gas Diffusion Electrode Flow Cell under Outdoor Solar Illumination. ACS Energy Letters 2020, 5 (2) , 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02576OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  12. Julie Tournet, Yonghwan Lee, Siva K. Karuturi, Hark H. Tan, Chennupati Jagadish. III–V Semiconductor Materials for Solar Hydrogen Production: Status and Prospects. ACS Energy Letters 2020, 5 (2) , 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02582OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  13. Xueqiang Zhang, Tuan Anh Pham, Tadashi Ogitsu, Brandon C. Wood, Sylwia Ptasinska. Modulation of Surface Bonding Topology: Oxygen Bridges on OH-Terminated InP (001). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (5) , 3196-3203. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11548OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  14. Sisir Yalamanchili, Erik Verlage, Wen-Hui Cheng, Katherine T. Fountaine, Philip R. Jahelka, Paul A. Kempler, Rebecca Saive, Nathan S. Lewis, Harry A. Atwater. High Broadband Light Transmission for Solar Fuels Production Using Dielectric Optical Waveguides in TiO2 Nanocone Arrays. Nano Letters 2020, 20 (1) , 502-508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04225OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  15. Paul A. Kempler, Harold J. Fu, Zachary P. Ifkovits, Kimberly M. Papadantonakis, Nathan S. Lewis. Spontaneous Formation of >90% Optically Transmissive, Electrochemically Active CoP Films for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2020, 11 (1) , 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02926OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  16. Xueqiang Zhang, Tadashi Ogitsu, Brandon C. Wood, Tuan Anh Pham, Sylwia Ptasinska. Oxidation-Induced Polymerization of InP Surface and Implications for Optoelectronic Applications. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (51) , 30893-30902. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07260OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  17. Byungwoo Kim, Gi Soon Park, Yun Jeong Hwang, Da Hye Won, Woong Kim, Dong Ki Lee, Byoung Koun Min. Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 Photocathodes with a Grown-In CuxS Catalyst for Solar Water Splitting. ACS Energy Letters 2019, 4 (12) , 2937-2944. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01816OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  18. Dilek K. Dogutan, Daniel G. Nocera. Artificial Photosynthesis at Efficiencies Greatly Exceeding That of Natural Photosynthesis. Accounts of Chemical Research 2019, 52 (11) , 3143-3148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00380OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  19. M. A. Khan, Purushothaman Varadhan, Vinoth Ramalingam, Hui-Chun Fu, Hicham Idriss, Jr-Hau He. Importance of Oxygen Measurements during Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Reactions. ACS Energy Letters 2019, 4 (11) , 2712-2718. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02151OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  20. Georgios Zafeiropoulos, Hannah Johnson, Sachin Kinge, Mauritius C. M. van de Sanden, Mihalis N. Tsampas. Solar Hydrogen Generation from Ambient Humidity Using Functionalized Porous Photoanodes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (44) , 41267-41280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12236OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  21. Pramod Patil Kunturu, Christos Zachariadis, Lukasz Witczak, Minh D. Nguyen, Guus Rijnders, Jurriaan Huskens. Tandem Si Micropillar Array Photocathodes with Conformal Copper Oxide and a Protection Layer by Pulsed Laser Deposition. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (44) , 41402-41414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b14408OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  22. Yongjie Wang, Jonathan Schwartz, Jiseok Gim, Robert Hovden, Zetian Mi. Stable Unassisted Solar Water Splitting on Semiconductor Photocathodes Protected by Multifunctional GaN Nanostructures. ACS Energy Letters 2019, 4 (7) , 1541-1548. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00549OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  23. Kang Wang, Dingwang Huang, Le Yu, Kuang Feng, Lintao Li, Takashi Harada, Shigeru Ikeda, Feng Jiang. Promising GeSe Nanosheet-Based Thin-Film Photocathode for Efficient and Stable Overall Solar Water Splitting. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (4) , 3090-3097. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00035OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  24. Charles R. Lhermitte, Kevin Sivula. Alternative Oxidation Reactions for Solar-Driven Fuel Production. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (3) , 2007-2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b04565OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  25. Kristina Wedege, Dowon Bae, Wilson A. Smith, Adélio Mendes, Anders Bentien. Solar Redox Flow Batteries with Organic Redox Couples in Aqueous Electrolytes: A Minireview. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (45) , 25729-25740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04914OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  26. Song Jin (Senior Editor, ACS Energy Letters). What Else Can Photoelectrochemical Solar Energy Conversion Do Besides Water Splitting and CO2 Reduction?. ACS Energy Letters 2018, 3 (10) , 2610-2612. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01800OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  27. Hiroshi Irie, Masaomi Yoda, Toshihiro Takashima, Junya Osaki. Silver cocatalyst-concentration dependence of overall water splitting performance over silver-inserted solid-state heterojunction photocatalyst composed of zinc rhodium oxide and bismuth vanadium oxide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2021, 284 , 119744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119744OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  28. Lipin Chen, Mahdi Alqahtani, Christophe Levallois, Antoine Létoublon, Julie Stervinou, Rozenn Piron, Soline Boyer-Richard, Jean-Marc Jancu, Tony Rohel, Rozenn Bernard, Yoan Léger, Nicolas Bertru, Jiang Wu, Ivan P. Parkin, Charles Cornet. Assessment of GaPSb/Si tandem material association properties for photoelectrochemical cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2021, 221 , 110888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110888OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  29. U Banin, N Waiskopf, L Hammarström, G Boschloo, M Freitag, E M J Johansson, J Sá, H Tian, M B Johnston, L M Herz, R L Milot, M G Kanatzidis, W Ke, I Spanopoulos, K L Kohlstedt, G C Schatz, N Lewis, T Meyer, A J Nozik, M C Beard, F Armstrong, C F Megarity, C A Schmuttenmaer, V S Batista, G W Brudvig. Nanotechnology for catalysis and solar energy conversion. Nanotechnology 2021, 32 (4) , 042003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abbce8OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  30. Linfeng Pan, Yuhang Liu, Liang Yao, Dan Ren, Kevin Sivula, Michael Grätzel, Anders Hagfeldt. Cu2O photocathodes with band-tail states assisted hole transport for standalone solar water splitting. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13987-5OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  31. Wooseok Yang, Jin Hyun Kim, Oliver S. Hutter, Laurie J. Phillips, Jeiwan Tan, Jaemin Park, Hyungsoo Lee, Jonathan D. Major, Jae Sung Lee, Jooho Moon. Benchmark performance of low-cost Sb2Se3 photocathodes for unassisted solar overall water splitting. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14704-3OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  32. Hemin Zhang, Dongfeng Li, Woo Jin Byun, Xiuli Wang, Tae Joo Shin, Hu Young Jeong, Hongxian Han, Can Li, Jae Sung Lee. Gradient tantalum-doped hematite homojunction photoanode improves both photocurrents and turn-on voltage for solar water splitting. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18484-8OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  33. Xin Sun, Devendra Tiwari, David J. Fermin. High Interfacial Hole‐Transfer Efficiency at GaFeO 3 Thin Film Photoanodes. Advanced Energy Materials 2020, 10 (45) , 2002784. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002784OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  34. Wu Zhou, Chung-Li Dong, Yiqing Wang, Yu-Cheng Huang, Lingyun He, Han-Wei Chang, Shaohua Shen. Manipulating metal-oxygen local atomic structures in single-junctional p-Si/WO3 photocathodes for efficient solar hydrogen generation. Nano Research 2020, 238 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3223-9OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  35. Charline Wolpert, Thomas Emmler, Maria Villa Vidaller, Andreas Elsenberg, Kentaro Shinoda, Mauricio Schieda, Frank Gärtner, Jun Akedo, Thomas Klassen. Aerosol-Deposited BiVO4 Photoelectrodes for Hydrogen Generation. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 2020, 24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-020-01104-8OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  36. Andrew H. Proppe, Yuguang C. Li, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Curtis P. Berlinguette, Christopher J. Chang, Richard Cogdell, Abigail G. Doyle, Johannes Flick, Nathaniel M. Gabor, Rienk van Grondelle, Sharon Hammes-Schiffer, Shaffiq A. Jaffer, Shana O. Kelley, Mario Leclerc, Karl Leo, Thomas E. Mallouk, Prineha Narang, Gabriela S. Schlau-Cohen, Gregory D. Scholes, Aleksandra Vojvodic, Vivian Wing-Wah Yam, Jenny Y. Yang, Edward H. Sargent. Bioinspiration in light harvesting and catalysis. Nature Reviews Materials 2020, 5 (11) , 828-846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0222-0OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  37. Yaping Zhang, Yuyu Bu, Lin Wang, Jin-Ping Ao. Regulation of the Photogenerated Carrier Transfer Process during Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: A Review. Green Energy & Environment 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2020.11.007OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  38. Choongman Moon, Brian Seger, Peter Christian Kjærgaard Vesborg, Ole Hansen, Ib Chorkendorff. Wireless Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Using Triple-Junction Solar Cell Protected by TiO2. Cell Reports Physical Science 2020, , 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100261OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  39. Tobias A. Kistler, Guosong Zeng, James L. Young, Lien‐Chun Weng, Chase Aldridge, Keenan Wyatt, Myles A. Steiner, Oscar Solorzano, Frances A. Houle, Francesca M. Toma, Adam Z. Weber, Todd G. Deutsch, Nemanja Danilovic. Emergent Degradation Phenomena Demonstrated on Resilient, Flexible, and Scalable Integrated Photoelectrochemical Cells. Advanced Energy Materials 2020, 3 , 2002706. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002706OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  40. Anupma Thakur, Dibyendu Ghosh, Pooja Devi, Ki-Hyun Kim, Praveen Kumar. Current progress and challenges in photoelectrode materials for the production of hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020, 397 , 125415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125415OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  41. David J. Lawrence, Brianna L. Smith, Cameron D. Collard, Keyton A. Elliott, Kyle L. Fakhoury, Jeffery D. Mangold, Anna N. Soyka. Monolithically-integrated BiVO4/p+-n GaAs1-xPx tandem photoanodes capable of unassisted solar water splitting. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.050OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  42. Jing Lin, Wenliang Wang, Guoqiang Li. Modulating Surface/Interface Structure of Emerging InGaN Nanowires for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Advanced Functional Materials 2020, 8 , 2005677. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202005677OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  43. Hicham Idriss. Hydrogen production from water: past and present. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2020, 29 , 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.05.009OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  44. Y.H. Kwok, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, F. Li, W. Pan, D.Y.C. Leung. Boosting cell performance and fuel utilization efficiency in a solar assisted methanol microfluidic fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45 (41) , 21796-21807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.163OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  45. Maheswari Arunachalam, Young Jun Seo, Seungwon Jeon, Kwang-Soon Ahn, Chung Soo Kim, Soon Hyung Kang. Colloidal metal Ag nanowire as an efficient co-catalyst for enhancing the solar water oxidation of fluorinated BiVO4 photoelectrode. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020, 394 , 125016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125016OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  46. Weilai Yu, Harold J. Fu, Thomas Mueller, Bruce S. Brunschwig, Nathan S. Lewis. Atomic force microscopy: Emerging illuminated and operando techniques for solar fuel research. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (2) , 020902. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009858OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  47. M. V. Lebedev. Modification of the Atomic and Electronic Structure of III–V Semiconductor Surfaces at Interfaces with Electrolyte Solutions (Review). Semiconductors 2020, 54 (7) , 699-741. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063782620070064OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  48. Siva Krishna Karuturi, Heping Shen, Astha Sharma, Fiona J. Beck, Purushothaman Varadhan, The Duong, Parvathala Reddy Narangari, Doudou Zhang, Yimao Wan, Jr‐Hau He, Hark Hoe Tan, Chennupati Jagadish, Kylie Catchpole. Over 17% Efficiency Stand‐Alone Solar Water Splitting Enabled by Perovskite‐Silicon Tandem Absorbers. Advanced Energy Materials 2020, 10 (28) , 2000772. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000772OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  49. Fangliang Gao, Qing Liu, Jiang Shi, Shuti Li. Recent Progress in Gallium Nitride for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. 2020,,https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92848OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  50. Paul A. Kempler, Robert H. Coridan, Nathan S. Lewis. Effects of bubbles on the electrochemical behavior of hydrogen-evolving Si microwire arrays oriented against gravity. Energy & Environmental Science 2020, 13 (6) , 1808-1817. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE00356EOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  51. Fatwa F. Abdi, Ronald Ramiro Gutierrez Perez, Sophia Haussener. Mitigating voltage losses in photoelectrochemical cell scale-up. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2020, 4 (6) , 2734-2740. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SE00246AOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  52. Carles Ros, Teresa Andreu, Joan R. Morante. Photoelectrochemical water splitting: a road from stable metal oxides to protected thin film solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (21) , 10625-10669. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA02755COpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  53. Ningsi Zhang, Xin Wang, Jianyong Feng, Huiting Huang, Yongsheng Guo, Zhaosheng Li, Zhigang Zou. Paving the road toward the use of β-Fe2O3 in solar water splitting: Raman identification, phase transformation and strategies for phase stabilization. National Science Review 2020, 7 (6) , 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa039OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  54. Jitendra N. Tiwari, Aditya Narayan Singh, Siraj Sultan, Kwang S. Kim. Recent Advancement of p‐ and d‐Block Elements, Single Atoms, and Graphene‐Based Photoelectrochemical Electrodes for Water Splitting. Advanced Energy Materials 2020, 10 (24) , 2000280. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000280OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  55. Edmund Samuel, Bhavana Joshi, Min-Woo Kim, Mark T. Swihart, Sam S. Yoon. Morphology engineering of photoelectrodes for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 2020, 72 , 104648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104648OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  56. Kang Wang, Dingwang Huang, Lintao Li, Kuang Feng, Takashi Harada, Shigeru Ikeda, Jingbo Li, Feng Jiang. Three‐Dimensional GeSe Microstructured Air Brick Photocathode for Advanced Solar Water Splitting. Solar RRL 2020, 4 (5) , 1900559. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.201900559OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  57. Jagat Das, Partha Pratim Sahu, Pritam Deb. H2 evolution through solar guided water splitting using Fe based composite electrode. Materials Today: Proceedings 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.877OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  58. M.A. Nadeem, H. Idriss. Effect of pH, temperature, and low light flux on the performance (16% STH) of coupled triple junction solar cell to water electrolysis. Journal of Power Sources 2020, 459 , 228074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228074OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  59. Behrooz Eftekharinia, Davood Danaei, Ali Dabirian. Computational study of film morphology impact on light absorption in particulate Ta 3 N 5 /Si photoanodes for water splitting. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2020, 53 (18) , 185501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab7512OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  60. Wolfram Jaegermann, Bernhard Kaiser, Friedhelm Finger, Vladimir Smirnov, Rolf Schäfer. Design Considerations of Efficient Photo-Electrosynthetic Cells and its Realization Using Buried Junction Si Thin Film Multi Absorber Cells. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 2020, 234 (4) , 549-604. https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2019-1584OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  61. Jiangang Jiang, Shichao Zong, Wenyi Ren, He Wang. Crystallite, optical, and photoelectrochemical properties of three-dimensional ZnO/CdS photoelectrodes synthesized by hydrothermal approach. Journal of Photonics for Energy 2020, 10 (02) , 1. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.10.023505OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  62. Scott K. Cushing, Ilana J. Porter, Bethany R. de Roulet, Angela Lee, Brett M. Marsh, Szilard Szoke, Mihai E. Vaida, Stephen R. Leone. Layer-resolved ultrafast extreme ultraviolet measurement of hole transport in a Ni-TiO 2 -Si photoanode. Science Advances 2020, 6 (14) , eaay6650. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay6650OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  63. Mark T. Spitler, Miguel A. Modestino, Todd G. Deutsch, Chengxiang X. Xiang, James R. Durrant, Daniel V. Esposito, Sophia Haussener, Stephen Maldonado, Ian D. Sharp, Bruce A. Parkinson, David S. Ginley, Frances A. Houle, Thomas Hannappel, Nathan R. Neale, Daniel G. Nocera, Paul C. McIntyre. Practical challenges in the development of photoelectrochemical solar fuels production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2020, 4 (3) , 985-995. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00869AOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  64. Sitaramanjaneya Mouli Thalluri, Lichen Bai, Cuncai Lv, Zhipeng Huang, Xile Hu, Lifeng Liu. Strategies for Semiconductor/Electrocatalyst Coupling toward Solar‐Driven Water Splitting. Advanced Science 2020, 7 (6) , 1902102. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902102OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  65. Tobias A. Kistler, Peter Agbo. Current loss analysis in photoelectrochemical devices. APL Materials 2020, 8 (3) , 031107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142561OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  66. Ryan T. Pekarek, Dylan G. Boucher, Nathan R. Neale, Michael J. Rose. Energetic Tug‐of‐War between Pt and Leaky TiO 2 : Positive and Negative Effects on the Function of Molecularly‐Modified p ‐Si(111)|TiO 2 |Pt Photocathodes. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7 (4) , 1048-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201901758OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  67. Jianyong Feng, Huiting Huang, Shicheng Yan, Wenjun Luo, Tao Yu, Zhaosheng Li, Zhigang Zou. Non-oxide semiconductors for artificial photosynthesis: Progress on photoelectrochemical water splitting and carbon dioxide reduction. Nano Today 2020, 30 , 100830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100830OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  68. O. Romanyuk, I. Gordeev, A. Paszuk, O. Supplie, J.P. Stoeckmann, J. Houdkova, E. Ukraintsev, I. Bartoš, P. Jiříček, T. Hannappel. GaP/Si(001) interface study by XPS in combination with Ar gas cluster ion beam sputtering. Applied Surface Science 2020, , 145903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145903OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  69. Hicham Idriss. The elusive photocatalytic water splitting reaction using sunlight on suspended nanoparticles: is there a way forward?. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (2) , 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY01818BOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  70. Florence Epron, Daniel Duprez. Hydrogen production by catalytic processes. 2020,,, 57-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817110-3.00003-5OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  71. Kuniaki Matoba, Yasuaki Matsuda, Masanari Takahashi, Yoshihisa Sakata, Jinlong Zhang, Shinya Higashimoto. Fabrication of Pt/In2S3/CuInS2 thin film as stable photoelectrode for water splitting under solar light irradiation. Catalysis Today 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.01.015OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  72. Tobias A. Kistler, Min Young Um, Peter Agbo. Stable Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Evolution for 1000 h at 14% Efficiency in a Monolithic Vapor-fed Device. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2020, 167 (6) , 066502. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7d93OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  73. Elena Rozzi, Francesco Demetrio Minuto, Andrea Lanzini, Pierluigi Leone. Green Synthetic Fuels: Renewable Routes for the Conversion of Non-Fossil Feedstocks into Gaseous Fuels and Their End Uses. Energies 2020, 13 (2) , 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020420OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  74. B. R. Jany, A. Janas, W. Piskorz, K. Szajna, A. Kryshtal, G. Cempura, P. Indyka, A. Kruk, A. Czyrska-Filemonowicz, F. Krok. Towards the understanding of the gold interaction with AIII-BV semiconductors at the atomic level. Nanoscale 2020, 3 https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR10256FOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  75. Vonika Ka-Man Au, Vivian Wing-Wah Yam. . 2020,,https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14908-XOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  76. Jenny Z. Zhang, Erwin Reisner. Advancing photosystem II photoelectrochemistry for semi-artificial photosynthesis. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2020, 4 (1) , 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-019-0149-4OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  77. Hongpeng Zhou, Menglei Feng, Kena Song, Bin Liao, Yichang Wang, Ruchuan Liu, Xiangnan Gong, Dingke Zhang, Lingfei Cao, Shijian Chen. A highly [001]-textured Sb 2 Se 3 photocathode for efficient photoelectrochemical water reduction. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (47) , 22871-22879. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR08700AOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  78. Jing Gao, Florent Sahli, Chenjuan Liu, Dan Ren, Xueyi Guo, Jérémie Werner, Quentin Jeangros, Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin, Christophe Ballif, Michael Grätzel, Jingshan Luo. Solar Water Splitting with Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Cell and TiC-Supported Pt Nanocluster Electrocatalyst. Joule 2019, 3 (12) , 2930-2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.10.002OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  79. Roland Dittmeyer, Michael Klumpp, Paul Kant, Geoffrey Ozin. Crowd oil not crude oil. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09685-xOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  80. Mario Borgwardt, Stefan T. Omelchenko, Marco Favaro, Paul Plate, Christian Höhn, Daniel Abou-Ras, Klaus Schwarzburg, Roel van de Krol, Harry A. Atwater, Nathan S. Lewis, Rainer Eichberger, Dennis Friedrich. Femtosecond time-resolved two-photon photoemission studies of ultrafast carrier relaxation in Cu2O photoelectrodes. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10143-xOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  81. Purushothaman Varadhan, Hui-Chun Fu, Yu-Cheng Kao, Ray-Hua Horng, Jr-Hau He. An efficient and stable photoelectrochemical system with 9% solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency via InGaP/GaAs double junction. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12977-xOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  82. Li Wang, Merranda Schmid, Justin B. Sambur. Single nanoparticle photoelectrochemistry: What is next?. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 151 (18) , 180901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124710OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  83. Yongjie Wang, Yuanpeng Wu, Jonathan Schwartz, Suk Hyun Sung, Robert Hovden, Zetian Mi. A Single-Junction Cathodic Approach for Stable Unassisted Solar Water Splitting. Joule 2019, 3 (10) , 2444-2456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.022OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  84. Wooseok Yang, Rajiv Ramanujam Prabhakar, Jeiwan Tan, S. David Tilley, Jooho Moon. Strategies for enhancing the photocurrent, photovoltage, and stability of photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chemical Society Reviews 2019, 48 (19) , 4979-5015. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00997JOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  85. Kwangwook Park, Yeong Jae Kim, Taeho Yoon, Selvaraj David, Young Min Song. A methodological review on material growth and synthesis of solar-driven water splitting photoelectrochemical cells. RSC Advances 2019, 9 (52) , 30112-30124. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA05341GOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  86. Wooseok Yang, Jooho Moon. Rapid advances in antimony triselenide photocathodes for solar hydrogen generation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2019, 7 (36) , 20467-20477. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA07990DOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  87. Chu Er Lim, Mei Lee Ooi, Richard C. S. Wong, Kian Eang Neo, Asad Mumtaz, Muhammad Mazhar, Norani Muti Mohamed, Mohamed Shuaib Mohamed Saheed. Facile synthesis of molybdenum multisulfide composite nanorod arrays from single-source precursor for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Applied Nanoscience 2019, 9 (6) , 1281-1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-019-00957-yOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  88. Guanyu Liu, Yuan Sheng, Joel W. Ager, Markus Kraft, Rong Xu. Research advances towards large-scale solar hydrogen production from water. EnergyChem 2019, 1 (2) , 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100014OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  89. Friedhelm Finger, Katharina Welter, Félix Urbain, Vladimir Smirnov, Bernhard Kaiser, Wolfram Jaegermann. Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting using Adapted Silicon Based Multi-Junction Solar Cell Structures: Development of Solar Cells and Catalysts, Upscaling of Combined Photovoltaic-Electrochemical Devices and Performance Stability. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie , Article ASAP.OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  90. Sisir Yalamanchili, Paul A. Kempler, Kimberly M. Papadantonakis, Harry A. Atwater, Nathan S. Lewis. Integration of electrocatalysts with silicon microcone arrays for minimization of optical and overpotential losses during sunlight-driven hydrogen evolution. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2019, 3 (9) , 2227-2236. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00294DOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  91. Keorock Choi, Kyunghwan Kim, In Kyu Moon, Jangwon Bang, Jungwoo Oh. Subwavelength photocathodes via metal-assisted chemical etching of GaAs for solar hydrogen generation. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (32) , 15367-15373. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR03870AOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  92. Luca Mascaretti, Aveek Dutta, Štěpán Kment, Vladimir M. Shalaev, Alexandra Boltasseva, Radek Zbořil, Alberto Naldoni. Plasmon‐Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting for Efficient Renewable Energy Storage. Advanced Materials 2019, 31 (31) , 1805513. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805513OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  93. Yi-Hsuan Chiu, Ting-Hsuan Lai, Ming-Yu Kuo, Ping-Yen Hsieh, Yung-Jung Hsu. Photoelectrochemical cells for solar hydrogen production: Challenges and opportunities. APL Materials 2019, 7 (8) , 080901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5109785OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  94. Thomas Moehl, Wei Cui, René Wick-Joliat, S. David Tilley. Resistance-based analysis of limiting interfaces in multilayer water splitting photocathodes by impedance spectroscopy. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2019, 3 (8) , 2067-2075. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00248KOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  95. Alexander N. Bondarchuk, Iván Corrales-Mendoza, Sergio A. Tomás, Frank Marken. A hematite photoelectrode grown on porous and conductive SnO2 ceramics for solar-driven water splitting. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44 (36) , 19667-19675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.055OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  96. Ashwathi Iyer, Kara Kearney, Elif Ertekin. Computational Approaches to Photoelectrode Design through Molecular Functionalization for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ChemSusChem 2019, 12 (9) , 1858-1871. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201802514OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  97. Jin Hyun Kim, Jae Sung Lee. Elaborately Modified BiVO 4 Photoanodes for Solar Water Splitting. Advanced Materials 2019, 31 (20) , 1806938. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806938OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  98. Saurabh Tembhurne, Fredy Nandjou, Sophia Haussener. A thermally synergistic photo-electrochemical hydrogen generator operating under concentrated solar irradiation. Nature Energy 2019, 4 (5) , 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0373-7OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  99. Irwa Issa, Sebastian Delbrück, Ulrich Hamm, . Bioeconomy from experts’ perspectives – Results of a global expert survey. PLOS ONE 2019, 14 (5) , e0215917. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215917OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  100. Zhibin Luo, Tuo Wang, Jinlong Gong. Single-crystal silicon-based electrodes for unbiased solar water splitting: current status and prospects. Chemical Society Reviews 2019, 48 (7) , 2158-2181. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00638EOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  101. Jin Hyun Kim, Dharmesh Hansora, Pankaj Sharma, Ji-Wook Jang, Jae Sung Lee. Toward practical solar hydrogen production – an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge. Chemical Society Reviews 2019, 48 (7) , 1908-1971. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00699GOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  102. Ashwini K. Nangia, Gautam R. Desiraju. Kristall‐Engineering: ein Blick in die Zukunft. Angewandte Chemie 2019, 131 (13) , 4142-4150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201811313OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  103. Ashwini K. Nangia, Gautam R. Desiraju. Crystal Engineering: An Outlook for the Future. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2019, 58 (13) , 4100-4107. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201811313OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  104. Paula Perez-Rodriguez, Wouter Vijselaar, Jurriaan Huskens, Machiel Stam, Michael Falkenberg, Miro Zeman, Wilson Smith, Arno H.M. Smets. Designing a hybrid thin-film/wafer silicon triple photovoltaic junction for solar water splitting. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2019, 27 (3) , 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3085OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  105. Shinjae Hwang, Spencer H. Porter, Anders B. Laursen, Hongbin Yang, Mengjun Li, Viacheslav Manichev, Karin U. D. Calvinho, Voshadhi Amarasinghe, Martha Greenblatt, Eric Garfunkel, G. Charles Dismukes. Creating stable interfaces between reactive materials: titanium nitride protects photoabsorber–catalyst interface in water-splitting photocathodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2019, 7 (5) , 2400-2411. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA12186AOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  106. A. Lenz, O. Supplie, E. Lenz, P. Kleinschmidt, T. Hannappel. Interface of GaP/Si(001) and antiphase boundary facet-type determination. Journal of Applied Physics 2019, 125 (4) , 045304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5080547OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  107. Félix Urbain, Sebastián Murcia-López, Nicole Nembhard, Javier Vázquez-Galván, Cristina Flox, Vladimir Smirnov, Katharina Welter, Teresa Andreu, Friedhelm Finger, Joan Ramón Morante. Solar vanadium redox-flow battery powered by thin-film silicon photovoltaics for efficient photoelectrochemical energy storage. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2019, 52 (4) , 044001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aaeab9OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  108. S. David Tilley. Recent Advances and Emerging Trends in Photo-Electrochemical Solar Energy Conversion. Advanced Energy Materials 2019, 9 (2) , 1802877. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201802877OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  109. Shu Hu. Membrane-less photoelectrochemical devices for H 2 O 2 production: efficiency limit and operational constraint. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2019, 3 (1) , 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SE00329GOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  110. Tobias A. Kistler, Nemanja Danilovic, Peter Agbo. Editors' Choice—A Monolithic Photoelectrochemical Device Evolving Hydrogen in Pure Water. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2019, 166 (13) , H656-H661. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1151913jesOpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  111. Matthias M. May, Kira Rehfeld. ESD Ideas: Photoelectrochemical carbon removal as negative emission technology. Earth System Dynamics 2019, 10 (1) , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-1-2019OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  112. Guohua Liu, Jinliang Xu, Kaiying Wang. All-in-one photosynthetic assemblies for solar fuels. Materials Today Energy 2018, 10 , 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2018.10.011OpenURL UNIV OF NORTH TEXAS
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Functionalization of a dual-junction tandem as the photoelectrode for unassisted water splitting: (a) schematic of the device structure after functionalization with interfacial films and electrocatalysts (see text); (b) topography of the crystalline anatase TiO2 layer by HRSEM and AFM; (c) protocol of the photoelectrodeposition of Rh NPs; the arrow shows the potential used for stroboscopic deposition under white light illumination, as shown in the upper left inset. The potential choices made are indicated by black dots; the best result was obtained for E = +0.3 V vs SCE. Resulting Rh particles are shown in the inset under the JV characteristic (upper image: SEM; lower one: AFM). The potential control and corresponding particle size distribution are included in Supporting Information section S1. The root-mean-square surface roughness of TiO2 is 6.3 and 3.6 nm (with/without Rh, respectively).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Optoelectronic properties of the surface-functionalized electrolyte/Rh/TiO2/oxide/AlInP–GaInP/GaInAs/GaAs water splitting device; (a) reflectivity Ra, measured in air, of the dual-junction tandem solar cell without ARC (black curve) and second reflectivity obtained after TiO2 coating (blue curve) and after photoelectrochemically deposited Rh NPs (yellow curve); Ra is larger than that under operation in electrolyte due to the different refractive indices of air and water; (b) comparison of the output characteristics of the tandem device after cap layer etching and of the full surface-functionalized photoelectrode. The orange arrows indicate the improvement after incorporation of the TiO2 layer.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Output characteristics of the RuO2–GaAs/GaInAs/GaInP/AlInP–anatase TiO2–Rh/electrolyte dual-junction tandem structure: (a) photocurrent–voltage characteristics in acidic (pH 0) and neutral (pH 7) electrolyte and in neutral electrolyte including an AEM membrane; (b) chronoamperometric data of the initial temporal regime; (c) stability measurements at −0.4 V vs a RuO2 counter electrode for acidic and neutral pH; (d) hydrogen and oxygen gas collection for operation in acidic (open spheres) and neutral (full spheres) electrolyte. The measured gas volume for oxygen (blue symbols) and hydrogen (red symbols) is overlaid with the expected produced gas volume, as calculated from charge passed through the anode and cathode.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Comparison of realized limiting STH efficiencies and historic development. The analysis refers to a theoretical benchmarking value ηtheo (see text) and takes into account the top and bottom cell band gaps for the respective photolysis cells; also shown are the institutions of the contributing research teams. Abbreviations: NREL - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA; ISE - Institute for Solar Energy, Germany; JCAP - Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Caltech; TU-I - Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany; HZB - Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Germany. The bar chart on the right indicates the achieved efficiency with respect to the respective theoretical limit (ηtheo*). See detail values in Supporting Information section S10.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 20 other publications.

    1. 1
      Walter, M. G.; Warren, E. L.; McKone, J. R.; Boettcher, S. W.; Mi, Q.; Santori, E. A.; Lewis, N. S. Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 64466473,  DOI: 10.1021/cr1002326
    2. 2
      Xiang, C.; Weber, A. Z.; Ardo, S.; Berger, A.; Chen, Y.; Coridan, R.; Fountaine, K. T.; Haussener, S.; Hu, S.; Liu, R. Modeling, Simulation, and Implementation of Solar-Driven Water-Splitting Devices. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1297412988,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201510463
    3. 3
      Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 3738,  DOI: 10.1038/238037a0
    4. 4
      Khaselev, O.; Turner, J. A. A Monolithic Photovoltaic-Photoelectrochemical Device for Hydrogen Production via Water Splitting. Science 1998, 280, 425427,  DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5362.425
    5. 5
      May, M. M.; Lewerenz, H. J.; Lackner, D.; Dimroth, F.; Hannappel, T. Efficient Direct Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion by in Situ Interface Transformation of a Tandem Structure. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8286,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9286
    6. 6
      Young, J. L.; Steiner, M. A.; Döscher, H.; France, R. M.; Turner, J. A.; Deutsch, T. G. Direct Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion via Inverted Metamorphic Multi-Junction Semiconductor Architectures. Nature Energy 2017, 2, 17028,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.28
    7. 7
      Lichterman, M. F.; Sun, K.; Hu, S.; Zhou, X.; McDowell, M. T.; Shaner, M. R.; Richter, M. H.; Crumlin, E. J.; Carim, A. I.; Saadi, F. H. Protection of Inorganic Semiconductors for Sustained, Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Catal. Today 2016, 262, 1123,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.017
    8. 8
      Bae, D.; Pedersen, T.; Seger, B.; Iandolo, B.; Hansen, O.; Vesborg, P. C. K.; Chorkendorff, I. Carrier-Selective P- and N-Contacts for Efficient and Stable Photocatalytic Water Reduction. Catal. Today 2017, 290, 5964,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.028
    9. 9
      Fountaine, K. T.; Lewerenz, H. J.; Atwater, H. A. Efficiency Limits for Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13706,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13706
    10. 10
      May, M. M.; Lackner, D.; Ohlmann, J.; Dimroth, F.; van de Krol, R.; Hannappel, T.; Schwarzburg, K. On the Benchmarking of Multi-Junction Photoelectrochemical Fuel Generating Devices. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 492503,  DOI: 10.1039/C6SE00083E
    11. 11
      Sathre, R.; Scown, C. D.; Morrow, W. R.; Stevens, J. C.; Sharp, I. D.; Ager, J. W., III; Walczak, K. A.; Houle, F. A.; Greenblatt, J. B. Life-Cycle Net Energy Assessment of Large-Scale Hydrogen Production via Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 32643278,  DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01019A
    12. 12
      Dimroth, F.; Beckert, R.; Meusel, M.; Schubert, U.; Bett, A. W. Metamorphic GayIn1-YP/Ga1-XInXAs Tandem Solar Cells for Space and for Terrestrial Concentrator Applications at C > 1000 Suns. Prog. Photovoltaics 2001, 9, 165178,  DOI: 10.1002/pip.362
    13. 13
      Ohlmann, J.; Sanchez, J. F. M.; Lackner, D.; Förster, P.; Steiner, M.; Fallisch, A.; Dimroth, F. Recent Development in Direct Generation of Hydrogen Using Multi-Junction Solar Cells. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1766, 080004,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4962102
    14. 14
      Porter, J. D.; Heller, A.; Aspnes, D. E. Experiment and Theory of “Transparent” Metal Films. Nature 1985, 313, 664666,  DOI: 10.1038/313664a0
    15. 15
      Degani, Y.; Sheng, T. T.; Heller, A.; Aspnes, D. E.; Studna, A. A.; Porter, J. D. Transparent” Metals: Preparation and Characterization of Light-Transmitting Palladium, Rhodium, and Rhenium Films. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1987, 228, 167178,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(87)80105-5
    16. 16
      Sanz, J. M.; Ortiz, D.; Alcaraz de la Osa, R.; Saiz, J. M.; González, F.; Brown, A. S.; Losurdo, M.; Everitt, H. O.; Moreno, F. UV Plasmonic Behavior of Various Metal Nanoparticles in the Near- and Far-Field Regimes: Geometry and Substrate Effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1960619615,  DOI: 10.1021/jp405773p
    17. 17
      Anderson, R. L. Germanium-Gallium Arsenide Heterojunctions. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1960, 4, 283287,  DOI: 10.1147/rd.43.0283
    18. 18
      Skorupska, K.; Pettenkofer, C.; Sadewasser, S.; Streicher, F.; Haiss, W.; Lewerenz, H. J. Electronic and Morphological Properties of the Electrochemically Prepared Step Bunched Silicon (111) Surface. Phys. Status Solidi B 2011, 248, 361369,  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201046454
    19. 19
      Rizk, R.; de Mierry, P.; Ballutaud, D.; Aucouturier, M.; Mathiot, D. Hydrogen Diffusion and Passivation Processes in P- And N-Type Crystalline Silicon. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1991, 44, 61416151,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.6141
    20. 20
      Zhang, Y.; Pluchery, O.; Caillard, L.; Lamic-Humblot, A.-F.; Casale, S.; Chabal, Y. J.; Salmeron, M. B. Sensing the Charge State of Single Gold Nanoparticles via Work Function Measurements. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 5155,  DOI: 10.1021/nl503782s
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920.

    • Device fabrication; materials characterization techniques; TiO2 characterization; surface layer band alignment; absorption enhancement by TiO2; optimization of the optical design; assessment of the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency measurement; comparative PEC test conditions and results; surface tension variation between pH 0 and 7; X-ray photoelectron spectra and mechanism development; and STH benchmarks (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE